The Alternate CD has, as far as I'm aware, always had it, but I don't think
the Live CD ever did.
On Jan 1, 2008 7:14 AM, Lex Hider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any plans to enable LVM for the live cd installers for hardy?
As I understand it, it would be fairly simple to implement.
On Jan 1, 2008 2:46 AM, Sarah Hobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Evan wrote:
My original worry in starting this thread was that the six-month cycle was
too short. I find that the normal releases aren't *quite* stable enough for
every-day use (even in a home environment) because of the features
On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 14:07 -0500, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
I still wouldn't call Gutsy the most unstable release I've used
though. That was Dapper, simply by virtue of being released right
around the same time my laptop was made. It didn't have time to get
proper hardware support for it.
On Jan 1, 2008 2:38 PM, Caroline Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 14:07 -0500, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
I still wouldn't call Gutsy the most unstable release I've used
though. That was Dapper, simply by virtue of being released right
around the same time my laptop was
On 12/31/07, Evan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a strawman, so feel free to rip it apart.
While I generally like the current Ubuntu release cycle, I find it has a few
problems:
Forcing LTS users to make do with software that is 2 or 3 major versions
out-of-date is just wrong. I
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 23:14:47 +1100
From: Lex Hider [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LVM on hardy's live installer?
To: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Is there any plans to enable LVM
I've not really tried it much yet, but for IM it seems to cover all the
basics - the same stuff as pidgin at least. It's a little different, but it
seems ok, I'll endeavour to give it more of a test run.
On Jan 2, 2008 4:30 PM, Mackenzie Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 1, 2008 8:45 PM,
I've just been trying it for IM, you're right, it doesn't stand up - but it
is better than Ekiga for VOIP stuf, or seems to be based on my early
impressions. I also agree with your assessment of pidgin.
On Jan 2, 2008 5:33 PM, Bryan Quigley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wengophone has a dependency
