Re: Including usb-modeswitch in default installation?

2010-02-20 Thread Timo Jyrinki
2010/2/13 Timo Jyrinki timo.jyri...@gmail.com: I think the main interesting thing would be that what are the usb-modeswitch developers' motivations and could they with some help from the kernel guys be directed to contribute more to the kernel. In addition to previous concerns in this thread

Re: Including usb-modeswitch in default installation?

2010-02-20 Thread Peteris Krisjanis
2010/2/20 Timo Jyrinki timo.jyri...@gmail.com: 2010/2/13 Timo Jyrinki timo.jyri...@gmail.com: I think the main interesting thing would be that what are the usb-modeswitch developers' motivations and could they with some help from the kernel guys be directed to contribute more to the kernel.

Re: Including usb-modeswitch in default installation?

2010-02-20 Thread Josua Dietze
Peteris Krisjanis schrieb: Conceptually udev modem-modeswitch is right way to go, but so far it supports only one vendor and no one has explained how to extend it. What would be the necessary conceptual changes in *usb-modeswitch* to make it fit for an inclusion into udev? Josua Dietze --

Re: Triaging Bugs with Patches

2010-02-20 Thread Evan
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Brian Murray br...@ubuntu.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:42:34PM -0500, Evan wrote: I've been triaging a few bugs, and I came across a pair of bugs in libpcap which had patches [1][2]. I found and checked the wiki page on triaging bugs with patches

RE: ubuntu-bug (was Bug reporting for Ubuntu Server? WTF?)

2010-02-20 Thread Ethan Baldridge
Even if you have X, another problem is that ubuntu-bug and apport ignore the $(HTTP_PROXY|http_proxy) variable, so it becomes very difficult to file bugs from work if you're behind a non-transparent proxy. -Original Message- From: ubuntu-devel-discuss-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com