On 03/15/2012 02:50 AM, Alan Pope wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14/03/12 14:44, Rodney Dawes wrote:
Ditën e Wed, 14/03/2012 më 14.21 +0200, Timo Jyrinki ka shkruar:
Sure it's the good ol' laggy Gwibber,
Can you please clarify what you mean by laggy here? And are
On 12.03.2012 01:04, Ken VanDine wrote:
The real problem we have with Gwibber is lack of contributors, we only
have a few regular contributors all with other responsibilities.
Fortunately I get to do some work on Gwibber as part of my day job
working for Canonical, which is awesome. However,
2012/3/14 Rodney Dawes rodney.da...@canonical.com:
Can you please clarify what you mean by laggy here? And are
there bugs open for what you mean by your use of the term?
The smooth scroll bug covers it mostly, but some specifics might use
separate bug reports. At least the following come to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14/03/12 14:44, Rodney Dawes wrote:
Ditën e Wed, 14/03/2012 më 14.21 +0200, Timo Jyrinki ka shkruar:
Sure it's the good ol' laggy Gwibber,
Can you please clarify what you mean by laggy here? And are
there bugs open for what you mean by your
On 03/10/2012 09:11 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
Is there anybody actually using Gwibber on a daily basic? I have it
uninstalled on all my machines and use Twitter through the Web-Interface.
fwiw, I leave it open all day on my workstation. However, I wouldn't
have a problem if I had to install
On 14/03/12 10:03, Chris Jones wrote:
To be honest, I can't stand anything to do with Gwibber and also agree
that it should be removed from the default install. And anyone with
half an understanding of programming code knows that Gwibber is
terrible by design.
Regards
Chris Jones
I'm
2012/3/12 Ken VanDine ken.vand...@canonical.com:
For those that haven't tried the latest version, I really suggest
getting 3.3.91 and taking that for a spin. Most of the effort we've put
into it recently have been quality, so no stunning changes but more
reliability. Duplicate detection and
Ditën e Wed, 14/03/2012 më 14.21 +0200, Timo Jyrinki ka shkruar:
Sure it's the
good ol' laggy Gwibber,
Can you please clarify what you mean by laggy here? And are
there bugs open for what you mean by your use of the term?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
On 14.03.2012 15:44, Rodney Dawes wrote:
Ditën e Wed, 14/03/2012 më 14.21 +0200, Timo Jyrinki ka shkruar:
Sure it's the
good ol' laggy Gwibber,
Can you please clarify what you mean by laggy here? And are
there bugs open for what you mean by your use of the term?
I don't know if Timo means
On 03/10/2012 09:11 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
Is there anybody actually using Gwibber on a daily basic? I have it
uninstalled on all my machines and use Twitter through the Web-Interface.
fwiw, I leave it open all day on my workstation. However, I wouldn't
have a problem if I had to install
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Benjamin Kerensa bkere...@ubuntu.com wrote:
* Performance Improvements (Gwibber seems very laggy)
I can't say I've never seen gwibber suffer a bit from lagginess,
though it's hard to say how much or when that was happening exactly,
and pinpointing it to a
Greetings,
My input here will not be completely unbiased, because time to time, I
hack on Gwibber and I help with minor patches here and there.
Nevertheless, I am probably one of the first people complaining to Ken
about things that are broken or half broken.
OP suggested removal of Gwibber
I don't think a couple of people expressing a little frustration with
a couple of missing or removed features, is a good reason to remove
something from the default install.
Even if I use the Twitter web site to interact with it, and gwibber is
slow to update, it is useful to see the
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Rodney Dawes
rodney.da...@canonical.com wrote:
I don't think a couple of people expressing a little frustration with
a couple of missing or removed features, is a good reason to remove
something from the default install.
Why? You guys think a few people
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 12:46 -0500, Bedwell, Jordon wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Rodney Dawes
rodney.da...@canonical.com wrote:
I don't think a couple of people expressing a little frustration with
a couple of missing or removed features, is a good reason to remove
something
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Rodney Dawes
rodney.da...@canonical.com wrote:
Even if I use the Twitter web site to interact with it, and gwibber is
slow to update, it is useful to see the notifications which pop up
due to gwibber running on my system (though I have a bug with where
the
Em 10-03-2012 17:01, Kai Mast escreveu:
Hey Guys,
I would like to open a discussion about removing Gwibber from the
default install. Gwibber has several defects that make it way worse to
use than the Twitter-Website.
- No support for Twitters Streaming API makes it a lot slower than the
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Kai Mast kai.m...@freakybytes.org wrote:
Hey Guys,
I would like to open a discussion about removing Gwibber from the
default install. Gwibber has several defects that make it way worse to
use than the Twitter-Website.
- No support for Twitters Streaming API
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 17:21 -0400, Evan Huus wrote:
If the Twitter website is sufficiently fast and feature-full that
Gwibber can never provide sufficient advantage to outweigh it's cost
in maintenance and CD space, then the correct solution is to remove
it. If it is believed that it can, in
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 15:37 -0500, Bedwell, Jordon wrote:
I don't need to troll Canonical, you lot do just fine at that by
yourselves. But I'll leave it to a Canonical employee to assume that
everybody who disagrees must be a troll and therefore is one by
default because they are blunt and
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Rodney Dawes
rodney.da...@canonical.com wrote:
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 15:37 -0500, Bedwell, Jordon wrote:
I don't need to troll Canonical, you lot do just fine at that by
yourselves. But I'll leave it to a Canonical employee to assume that
everybody who
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Soren Hansen so...@linux2go.dk wrote:
2012/3/11 Bedwell, Jordon jor...@envygeeks.com:
Remember, the Canonical usability test only consisted of 15 people (that
sir,
is a huge and I mean HUGE sample group) and that was good enough for
ya'll
this right here is a
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 17:21 -0400, Evan Huus wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Kai Mast kai.m...@freakybytes.org
wrote:
Hey Guys,
I would like to open a discussion about removing Gwibber from
the
default install. Gwibber has several defects
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Ken VanDine ken.vand...@ubuntu.com wrote:
First thing is to remember the reasoning behind including gwibber in
Ubuntu wasn't to provide a twitter client, it was for social networking
integration in the desktop. Provide an easy way to share information
with
On 03/11/2012 07:14 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Ken VanDine ken.vand...@ubuntu.com
mailto:ken.vand...@ubuntu.com wrote:
First thing is to remember the reasoning behind including gwibber in
Ubuntu wasn't to provide a twitter client, it was for social
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Benjamin Kerensa bkere...@ubuntu.com wrote:
* Performance Improvements (Gwibber seems very laggy)
* GUI Improvements (I would love the ability to have columns much like
TweetDeck/Hootsuite and other popular social clients)
* Bit.ly Integration and TwitPic
Hey Guys,
I would like to open a discussion about removing Gwibber from the
default install. Gwibber has several defects that make it way worse to
use than the Twitter-Website.
- No support for Twitters Streaming API makes it a lot slower than the
Website
NOTE: This feature is nearly 2 years
Hey Guys,
I would like to open a discussion about removing Gwibber from the
default install. Gwibber has several defects that make it way worse to
use than the Twitter-Website.
- No support for Twitters Streaming API makes it a lot slower than the
Website
NOTE: This feature is nearly 2
On 03/10/2012 12:01 PM, Kai Mast wrote:
Hey Guys,
I would like to open a discussion about removing Gwibber from the
default install. Gwibber has several defects that make it way worse to
use than the Twitter-Website.
- No support for Twitters Streaming API makes it a lot slower than the
29 matches
Mail list logo
