Re: Proposal for collaborative maintenance of packages

Hi, first of all big thanks to Raphael for your great proposal! I'd also be more than happy to join the project. Am Montag 19 Dezember 2005 16:25 schrieb Asheesh Laroia: Thanks. I agree with the Ubuntu side of this discussion that dealing with non-distributed svn would be a pain; I don't

Re: Status of {uni,multi}verse : 105 merges to do !

Hi, Am Mittwoch 04 Januar 2006 18:00 schrieb Stephan Hermann: Hi Lucas, On Wednesday 04 January 2006 01:36, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Hi, I generated a status of universe and multiverse : http://ox.blop.info/bazaar/universe-versionslist.html.gz Packages with the same version number are

Re: MOTU needed for merge/sync review !

Hi, Am Dienstag 17 Januar 2006 00:50 schrieb Raphaël Pinson: Hi, I also have two syncs to be achieved (both in multiverse) : https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/unrar-nonfree/+bug/6664 This is no ubuntu-specific version, so it should get autosynced (in case we'll have any more

Re: next MOTU-meeting

Hi folks, Wed, Feb 1, 20.00h UTC is our next MOTU-meeting. Please add your topics to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Meetings. Cheers, Stefan. -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu

UVF-exception: xpdf (security)

Hi, actually this is no UVF-exception, since it's a security update (no new upstream version, just one patch applied which fixes CVE-2006-0301). Maybe a sync could be requested with the next batch? (new xpdf 3.01-6 is in incoming atm) @crimsun: the only change done to xpdf in dapper is the

MOTU Meeting Minutes from 12 Jan 2006 (finally)

attending == * Stefan Potyra (sistpoty) * Daniel Holbach (dholbach) * Stephan Hermann (\sh) * Daniel Chen (crimsun) * Yann Rouillard (chninkel) * Raphael Pinson (raphink) * Jordan Mantha (LaserJock) * Jani Monoses (janimo) * Lucas Duailibe (lucasd) * Jonathan Ridell (Ridell

ocaml-transition

Hi List and Gauvain, I just noticed, that Gauvain filed some bugs w. debdiffs regarding ocaml-packages to malone, please don't upload these (blindly) yet. Unfortunately upstream version freeze hit us in the middle (or beginning?) of unstable's ocaml-transition to a new upstream version of the

allegro transition - a kind of UVF exception (w.o. diffstat and changes)

Hi folks, for ubuntu dapper we have allegro4.1, while debian unstable has allegro4.2 (*and* allegro4.1). Difference is, that allegro4.2 provides liballegro4.2-dev whereas allegro4.1 provides liballegro-dev. Most of the rdepends in debian are already migrated (and the ones that were

allegro transition - a kind of UVF exception

Hi folks, for ubuntu dapper we have allegro4.1, while debian unstable has allegro4.2 (*and* allegro4.1). Difference is, that allegro4.2 provides liballegro4.2-dev whereas allegro4.1 provides liballegro-dev. Most of the rdepends in debian are already migrated (and the ones that were

UVF exception request: bum (2.1.4-1 to 2.1.5-1)

Hi, fixes: malone 29831. diffstat: diff -ruN bum-2.1.4 bum-2.1.5 | diffstat ChangeLog | 47 configure | 22 +- configure.in|6 data/bum.glade |2 debian/changelog|9 debian/copyright|2 debian/menu |2

Re: new poll for MOTU work coordination

Hi Reinhard, Am Sonntag 19 Februar 2006 18:41 schrieb Reinhard Tartler: Stefan Potyra wrote: Currently: Imo we need at least track (somehow) for what packages syncs are requested (due too the fact, that syncs currently aren't processed). How about handling syncs via our mailing list

Re: Open Sync Requests, Week 7 - more open syncs ;)

Am Sonntag 19 Februar 2006 20:03 schrieb Reinhard Tartler: Other syncs, taken from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/WorkInProgress: I guess we messed this up a little bit, since we wanted to list requested syncs in the Done-Section (and remove them, once they were synced)... so here some more...

UVF-exception request: gnomeicu

Hi Sebastien and List, current gnomeicu doesn't work any longer, since the icq-protocol was changed... (debian BTS: #352752). New package prepared at: http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=1870 It works well under KDE ;) Changelog and diffstat attached. Cheers, Stefan. ChangeLog

Re: Repackaging a Debian package for use with Breezy

Hi again, (moving to ubuntu-motu list, as I think this is a better place for this topic). Am Montag 20 Februar 2006 21:00 schrieb Andrew Conkling: Hey Stefan, thanks for the reply. I didn't even think to check if it would be added; that's great to hear! (It also spurs me on to get a few

Re: UVF Exception request for feed2imap 0.6-1 - 0.7-1

Hi, Am Dienstag 21 Februar 2006 23:28 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: Hi, - I am the upstream dev and the debian maintainer, so I know the package quite well ;) - no open bugs in Debian - 0.7 fixes several bugs that can be very annoying for the user Changelog: feed2imap (0.7-1) unstable;

Re: Open Sync Requests, Week 7 - much more open syncs ;)

Hi Folks, Good news everyone: [00:06:23] sistpoty Kamion | mdz: do you know if there is an ETA until syncs will be progressed again? [...] [00:10:04] Kamion sistpoty: elmo was asking for example syncs to test earlier, so I assume he's working on them. I have no ETA. [...] [00:36:31] doko mdz,

Re: UVF exception request: librmagick-ruby 1.9.3-1 - 1.10.0-2

Hi, Am Dienstag 21 Februar 2006 23:47 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: Hi, - I am the Debian maintainer for this package. - The package comes with a documentation that generates *a lot* of examples at build time. So it works for sure. Debian changelog: a few bug fixes, amongst them an FTBFS bug.

Re: UVF exception request for rake 0.6.2-2 - 0.7.0-1

Hi again, Am Mittwoch 22 Februar 2006 18:16 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: It is the kind of package that makes developers' life hell if their package's version is lagging behind. E.g: Developer A writes a Rakefile which works with v. 0.7.0, but doesn't with v. 0.6.2. Developers B (dapper user) only

Re: UVF for PyBlosxom

Hi Reinhard, Am Samstag 25 Februar 2006 15:50 schrieb Reinhard Tartler: This is http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-0707 output of madison-lite: madison-lite pyblosxom pyblosxom |1.3.2-2 | unstable | source, all pyblosxom |1.2.1-2 |breezy |

bum_2.1.5-1

Hi, bum_2.1.5-1 (no ubuntu specific changes present) UVF exception granted, just requested the sync. Thanks, Stefan. -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu

Re: call for motu-meeting once again

Hi again ;) Am Mittwoch 01 März 2006 01:00 schrieb Stefan Potyra: Poll is here[1], will start at 2006-04-03 00:00 UTC and end on 2006-08-03 00:00 UTC. Thanks to ajmitch, the poll dates are corrected now: Start: 2006-03-04 End: 2006-03-08 I needed to setup a new poll for this: https

the merge-list reworked or how to manage workflow

Hi folks, the merge-list decided to go offline and replaced itself somehow with the MOTU-Worklist-tool. I had almost nothing to do with it ;). You can find the worklist at [1]. You'll need to file a bug with the title accepted work[2] to mark that you're working on a package and assign it to

next motu-meeting is: Fri, 10 March - 20.00 UTC

Hi folks, the voting in the catagory best date for next motu-meeting is over... and the winner with 2 votes and 0 counter-votes is: Fri, 10 March - 20.00 UTC The place will be (as always) #ubuntu-meeting on freenode. Please come to the meeting, if you're a MOTU, a MOTU-hopeful or generally

Re: Any word about this message from back in January.

Hi George, hi folks, Am Freitag 21 April 2006 00:26 schrieben Sie: This package really works great and there are deb file on the site, it would probably be trivial to build for Dapper. This package was featured in Linux Journal some time ago. Before Nick (the I have a chip on my shoulder)

Re: Etherape not installable.

Hi Sivan, Am Sonntag 11 Juni 2006 16:40 schrieb Sivan Greenberg: Hi List, Trying to install etherape today on dapper, I got: The following packages have unmet dependencies: etherape: Depends: libpcap0.7 but it is not installable E: Broken packages It appears that we do not have

Re: No configure file?

Hi, Am Montag 12 Juni 2006 03:20 schrieb Robert Stoffers: Hi, I've been messing around with building a package for Kdenlive (http://kdenlive.sourceforge.net) however I'm getting an odd error about the configure file missing. Attached below is the snipped output, attached are the rules and

Re: Merges

Hi Dennis, Am Montag 03 Juli 2006 14:08 schrieb Dennis Kaarsemaker: Hi MOTU, I've investigated a few outstanding merges, and there are quite a few that can simply be synced (see below), can someone request a sync? I also want to do some real merges, can someone sponsor them for me? Great,

Re: Merges

Am Montag 03 Juli 2006 15:09 schrieb Dennis Kaarsemaker: On ma, 2006-07-03 at 14:39 +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote: aclock.app, agenda.app, camera.app, cddb.bundle, cenon.app, charmap.app, connect.app, cynthiune.app, displaycalibrator.app, easydiff.app, edenmath.app, gnuwash.app, gomoku.app

Re: Request for merge assistance.

Hi, Am Freitag 07 Juli 2006 13:49 schrieb Luke Yelavich: Hi MOTUs I am writing to request a favour from MOTUs out there. I have several packages that have my name against them for merging, which I have just about completed. A couple of which are syncs. Details of the packages are below. I

Re: Very old merges

Hi, Am Dienstag 18 Juli 2006 09:28 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: Hi, I've tried to take a different look at the list of needed merges. [0] already shows the evolution of merges to do compared to Debian as of today, and to snapshots of Debian in the past. One particularly interesting list of

Re: CommonPackagingMistakes updated -- notes about debian/copyright

Am Samstag 22 Juli 2006 23:47 schrieb Stefan Potyra: I've finally updated the CommonPackagingMistakes section of the debian wiki. lalala... s/debian/ubuntu/ ;) -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu

Re: CommonPackagingMistakes updated -- notes about debian/copyright

Hi Matthew, first of all thanks for your feedback, I'll overhaul the section. Am Sonntag 23 Juli 2006 03:03 schrieb Matthew Palmer: On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 11:47:58PM +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote: == Prelude == When reviewing packages, one major common error I find is that the copyright

Re: CommonPackagingMistakes updated -- notes about debian/copyright

Hi Matthew, Am Montag 24 Juli 2006 02:36 schrieb Matthew Palmer: On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 04:35:58PM +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote: Am Sonntag 23 Juli 2006 03:03 schrieb Matthew Palmer: On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 11:47:58PM +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote: == Prelude == When reviewing packages

Re: More efficient package reviewing

Hi, Am Donnerstag 03 August 2006 00:09 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: On 02/08/06 at 15:58 -0400, Hubert Figuiere wrote: Hi, I would like to raise a few points/concerns about the package reviewing process and the fact that the backlog of package to be review on REVU is increasing every day.

Re: dvdstyler

Hi, Am Monday 28 August 2006 18:07 schrieb George Farris: It would be great to see this GTK+ app in Universe. It is a very straight forward dvd creator and was featured in Linux Journal a few months ago. http://dvdstyler.sourceforge.net/ FWIW, it was once uploaded to breezy, but seems to

Re: swt-gtk

Hi Andy, Am Sunday 03 September 2006 09:42 schrieb Andrew Price: swt-gtk seems to have been removed from universe[1] but the newer version in Debian[2] contains libraries required for other packages to build, e.g. libswt-gtk-3.2-java is needed for the latest azureus package (which can't be

Re: motu-sru members

Hi, Am Dienstag 31 Oktober 2006 09:00 schrieb Jordan Mantha: Daniel Holbach wrote: Hello everybody, I think we should try to get the motu-sru team functional until Friday, so we have everything in place, even before UDS. :-) As process I propose, just following up to this thread and

Re: Stable Release Updates policy

Hi Daniel, Am Dienstag 07 November 2006 04:31 schrieb Daniel Holbach: Hello everybody, I'm going to add our process to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates soon. Can you all check that the 'proposal' part of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Processes/SRU is ok? erm... looks like we got

Re: Release Schedule, Herd 1 and later bugs

Hi, Am Mittwoch 22 November 2006 09:24 schrieb Reinhard Tartler: Daniel Holbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: let's make Beta Freeze = Universe Freeze. What do you think? I think we should take the state of debian/unstable into consideration of the freeze date. According the the latest d-d-a

MOTU-SRU-Report, w49

Hi folks, here's the MOTU-SRU-Report, W49: First of all, we've been doing some cleanup on our queue and rejected bugs that were not SRU-ready due to missing patches. Also we've been internally discussing two minor points in the current SRU policy: * the tags to use, once a package makes it

Re: MOTU-SRU-Report, w49

Am Dienstag 05 Dezember 2006 22:02 schrieb Stefan Potyra: And now the list of bugs we handled/are handling: and another one... which wasn't on my all-knowing list: https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/gtetrinet/+bug/74133 * needs more votes. pgpUkfvZo4swt.pgp Description: PGP

Re: MOTU-SRU-Report, w49

Hi Daniel, Am Mittwoch 06 Dezember 2006 08:38 schrieb Daniel Holbach: Hello Stefan, thanks a lot for the report. You guys do an awesome job! thanks. Am Dienstag, den 05.12.2006, 22:02 +0100 schrieb Stefan Potyra: And now the list of bugs we handled/are handling: ... if I counted

Two sru's that need love

Hi folks, this time I've got two bugs from motu-sru which nobody cared for yet. Both are really low-hanging fruit, so we only need YOU to take care for providing debdiffs, doing the upload, finding testers and so on. If you want one, please make yourself the assignee to the bug in question.

Re: Review Process

Hi folks, I've just been looking over the proposed process from Daniel, and tbh I don't think it will - in its current form - help in any way to improve the current situation with new packages. Nonetheless, there are some bits, I like with it. Please see this as constructive criticism to get

MOTU Meeting let's do it again ;)

Hi folks, Let's stick our heads all together once again. Thus, I'm calling for a motu-meeting once again. The only thing in question is the date and time yet; I guess we'll have enough things to discuss. 1. proposal: This Friday, 12/15/06, 20.00 UTC 2. proposal: Next Wednesday, 12/20/06, 22.00

Date for next motu-meeting is...

Hi, the decision is a little bit early, because Andrew reminded me gently: [21:35:18] ajmitch sistpoty: so, time to make a decision on the motu meeting [21:35:25] ajmitch otherwise friday will pass us by The winning date is: This Friday, 12/15/06, 20.00 UTC Hope to see as many of you

Re: MOTU Meeting Minutes Friday, Dec. 15

Hi, Am Freitag 15 Dezember 2006 22:52 schrieb Reinhard Tartler: Freeze Dates: universe will keep the same dates as Main. cf. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FeistyReleaseSchedule the decision was actually to discuss the release dates on ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list. However one proposal was to

MOTU-SRU report, W51

Hi folks, first of all, there have been more changes to the SRU-policy, but none were dramatic: * Jordan Mantha pointed out, that if a MOTU sponsors a non-MOTU with an SRU request, the MOTU still needs to make sure that the package in question builds and will work, even if the whole motu-sru

REVU: dopi uploaded

Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 21:57:50 +0100 Source: dopi Binary: dopi Architecture: source Version: 0.3.4-0ubuntu1 Distribution: feisty Urgency: low Maintainer: Lionel Le Folgoc (mr_pouit) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Lionel Le Folgoc (mr_pouit) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: dopi - Upload songs

REVU: innotop uploaded

Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 01:33:14 +0100 Source: innotop Binary: innotop Architecture: source Version: 0.1.160-0ubuntu1 Distribution: feisty Urgency: low Maintainer: Sebastien Estienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Sebastien Estienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: innotop- top like

REVU: klear uploaded

Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 18:38:41 +0100 Source: klear Binary: klear Architecture: source Version: 0.6.0-0ubuntu1 Distribution: feisty Urgency: low Maintainer: Marcus Czeslinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Marcus Czeslinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: klear - DVB TV viewer and

REVU: konq-plugin-digg uploaded

Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:07:57 +0200 Source: konq-plugin-digg Binary: konq-plugin-digg Architecture: source Version: 1.0-0ubuntu1 Distribution: feisty Urgency: low Maintainer: Harald Sitter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Harald Sitter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: konq-plugin-digg -

new team: motu-swat

Hi folks, a bad security bug coming along your way? Starting to feel insecure? Then it's time to call for the all new motu-swat, the police of universe, who will squish all security bugs and thus make universe a safer place. Our upcoming missions can be found at [1]. For all bug triagers:

Re: new team: motu-swat

Hi, Am Freitag 12 Januar 2007 06:57 schrieb Kees Cook: One thing I'd like to figure out is some way to publicize universe security updates more widely. One place that collects the recent package updates is the Ubuntu Weekly Newsletter. There's a Security Updates section which catches USNs

Re: SRU policy for universe

Hi, Am Mittwoch 17 Januar 2007 17:43 schrieb Jordan Mantha: * any motu can do uploads to -proposed that won't land in any queue, motu-sru would do the verification which is now done by archive-admins, once the package is already in -proposed. Note that this might backfire, because it

Re: SRU policy for universe

Hi, Am Mittwoch 17 Januar 2007 22:14 schrieb Tollef Fog Heen: Stefan Potyra skrev: Other options are (also I don't know if these are possible with lp as is): * motu-sru can do uploads to -proposed that won't land in any queue Also not possible directly, but I (or another archive admin

Re: MOTU Meeting

Hi, Am Donnerstag 18 Januar 2007 02:51 schrieb Cody A.W. Somerville: I voted on the wiki for Monday, January 22nd, 2000hrs UTC. cool, a graphical wiki-poll :). You rock! @all: please add your votes to the wiki. Thanks, Stefan. pgpDQqX4RQN5v.pgp Description: PGP signature -- Ubuntu-motu

Re: SRU policy for universe

Hi, Am Donnerstag 18 Januar 2007 08:05 schrieb Tollef Fog Heen: Stefan Potyra skrev: However I'm still not entirely convinced, that the whole process for universe SRU's is optimal yet. There are also some high delays between the first debdiff and three acks from motu-sru, which might

Re: Request to add translations from Rosetta into universe packages

Hi Carlos, Am Donnerstag 18 Januar 2007 18:27 schrieb Carlos Perelló Marín: Hi, We have got several requests from Ubuntu derivatives to allow them to translate non main packages using Launchpad/Rosetta. After talking with other Launchpad team members, we are thinking about the possibility

next MOTU Meeting

Hi, date is now fixed: the next MOTU meeting will take place on Monday, January 22nd, 20.00h UTC in #ubuntu-meeting. Cheers, Stefan. pgpj8yqaw6GDx.pgp Description: PGP signature -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at:

SRU policy for universe, #2

Hi again, as of tonights MOTU meeting, we decided on the following changes regarding SRU's for universe: * the member of motu-sru, which gives the 3rd ACK, will also take care for uploading a package to -proposed (regardless if the request comes from a MOTU or non-MOTU). * ubuntu-archive

[StableReleaseUpdates]: dosemu (dapper-proposed)

Hi, dosemu is now in dapper-proposed and needs testing. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dosemu/+bug/72951 The SRU should fix the package xfonts-dosemu (fonts not working) and xdosemu. Cheers, Stefan. pgpjOYV4V1BlC.pgp Description: PGP signature -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list

motu-swat report w5/2007

Hi folks, first off, we got a new team member, Martin Jürgens, who is already busy fixing bugs :). Here the list of uni/multi-verse security-updates during the last ~two weeks: feisty: wordpress: feisty https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wordpress/+bug/78145 CVE 2007-0106, CVE 2007-0107

REVU: mixxx 1.5.0svn~20070130dfsg-0ubuntu1 uploaded.

(Updated package). Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 19:50:20 -0500 Source: mixxx Binary: mixxx mixxx-data Architecture: source Version: 1.5.0svn~20070130dfsg-0ubuntu1 Distribution: feisty Urgency: low Maintainer: Paul Brossier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Albert Santoni [EMAIL PROTECTED]

REVU: mail-spf-perl 2.004-0ubuntu1 uploaded

Format: 1.7 Date: Monu, 22 Jan 2007 22:10:50 -0500 Source: mail-spf-perl Binary: spf-tools-perl libmail-spf-perl Architecture: source Version: 2.004-0ubuntu1 Distribution: feisty Urgency: low Maintainer: Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description:

Upcoming REVU sprint

Hi folks, since FeatureFreeze for universe is approaching with great pace (22. Feb), it's time to do another revu-sprint to review and give feedback on as many packages as possible. This revu-sprint will start on Thursday this week, February 8th and will last three days until Saturday.

REVU: soma (2.3.1+dfsg1-0ubuntu1) uploaded

Hi, Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:44:12 -0500 Source: soma Binary: soma-server libsoma-dev libsoma2 Architecture: source Version: 2.3.1+dfsg1-0ubuntu1 Distribution: feisty Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrew Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andrew Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description:

REVU: zeroinstall-injector (0.25-0ubuntu1) uploaded

Hi, as discussed on the motu-meeting right now, ubuntu-archive will have the final say on zerinstall-injector. Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:50:46 + Source: zeroinstall-injector Binary: zeroinstall-injector Architecture: source Version: 0.25-0ubuntu1 Distribution: feisty Urgency:

Re: motu-sru report, W7 2007

On Friday 16 February 2007 03:04:57 Stefan Potyra wrote: [...] As a first step, I've made a post in the forums to call for help, see [1]. [1]: http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=362624 pgpGLUAXZTfWv.pgp Description: PGP signature -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu

motu-sru report, W7 2007

Hi folks, currently the motu-sru process seems to have stalled at the next phase: testing proposed updates. Many packages are only tested by one or two persons, and didn't receive any testing yet. As a first step, I've made a post in the forums to call for help, see [1]. I'm also CC-ing

REVU: wired (0.4-0ubuntu1) uploaded

Hi, Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 08:52:31 + Source: wired Binary: wired Architecture: source Version: 0.4-0ubuntu1 Distribution: feisty Urgency: low Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU Developers ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Changed-By: Toby Smithe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: wired - Audio

REVU: splatd (1.1-0ubuntu1) uploaded.

Hi, Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:16:12 -0800 Source: splatd Binary: splatd Architecture: source Version: 1.1-0ubuntu1 Distribution: feisty Urgency: low Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU Developers ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Changed-By: Nick Barkas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: splatd -

REVU: enblend (3.0.dfsg.1-0ubuntu1) uploaded, finally :)

Hi, Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 19:55:32 + Source: enblend Binary: enblend Architecture: source Version: 3.0.dfsg.1-0ubuntu1 Distribution: feisty Urgency: low Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU Developers ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Changed-By: Toby Smithe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: enblend

Re: Fwd: Regarding your upload of supertux-0.3.0

Hi, On Saturday 24 February 2007 01:18:35 Alexandre Vassalotti wrote: The problem is that SuperTux 0.3 is unsupported, and unlike experimental, we will eventually need to support Feisty. Therefore, I think the best thing would to downgrade the package, as requested. This is sad though; I

MOTU Meeting minutes, March 6th 2007

MOTU Meeting, Mar 6th 2007 == SRU Policy evaluation. How can we make it more efficient and worthwhile? == Since many universe proposed SRU packages are stuck in the testing phase, we discussed how to improve the situation. Ideas to solve it included: * Just have motu-sru ack then upload to

Re: KDE 4 uploads to universe

Hi, On Thursday 08 March 2007 15:50:39 Jonathan Riddell wrote: The Kubuntu Council have decided to treat KDE 4 and related packages with a general upstream version freeze exception, pending any objections from MOTU Council. This includes other pre-release software such as decibel and strigi

Re: Policy decisions / relationship between MC and MOTU Meeting

Hi, On Thursday 08 March 2007 12:33:43 Daniel Holbach wrote: [..] * Also Daniel made his proposal and everybody started voting. While it is good to have feedback on who's supporting the idea and who's not, it wasn't quite clear who was in charge of making the

Re: call for votes: KDE4 uploads to universe

Hi, just came up with a different idea: What if we'd allow kde4 specific packages in now, and would have the binary packages removed before feisty is released*. Jonathan, would that be an option or would it defeat the original purpose? *) in case ubuntu-archive allows this. Cheers,

Re: call for votes: KDE4 uploads to universe

Hi Reinhard, On Tuesday 13 March 2007 16:53:29 Reinhard Tartler wrote: Btw, is there a public vote running for this, or is the subject just misleading? sorry, subject is a little bit misleading. The call for votes is for MOTU Council, see [1]. Cheers, Stefan. -- [1]:

StableReleaseUpdates (edgy): mldonkey (-server, -gui)

Hi, please test mldonkey{-server, -gui} from edgy-proposed. Corresponding bug: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mldonkey/+bug/83731 Changes: * Add debian/patches/avoid-duplicate-sending.dpatch taken from 2.8.1-2etch1, to avoid sending duplicate packages with clients using

Re: Improving the MOTU Community

Hi, On Wednesday 14 March 2007 12:48:11 Daniel Holbach wrote: * Create regular events Things I can think of: * QA sessions * MOTU School sessions - even if we repeat ourselves, also look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/School/Requests * Universe HUG DAYs

MOTU Newsletter [was: Re: Improving the MOTU Community]

Hi again, On Wednesday 14 March 2007 16:59:49 I wrote: * monthly digest of motu news (e.g. policy changes) first skeleton for the april issue: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Newsletter please help :) Cheers, Stefan. pgpR66snerWgJ.pgp Description: PGP signature -- Ubuntu-motu mailing

Re: Fast-track mentoring for lupine_85 and pricechild

Hi Mark, On Saturday 17 March 2007 01:16:27 Mark Shuttleworth wrote: Hi MOTU-Council I'm writing to request that the MOTU fast-track lupine_85 and pricechild, who maintain Beryl packages for Ubuntu in the beryl-project.org repository, into the MOTU team. I think it would be very useful to

MOTU Council Charter

Hi, during today's MOTU meeting, we've been discussing MOTU Council's charter [1]. However since only a few MOTUs were present today, I'm now rising this issue on the mailing list. Anything, that's missing, needs to get improved/rectified in the Charter? Are you all happy with it? Cheers,

Re: motu-sru follow up

Hi, On Monday 02 April 2007 11:31:09 Daniel Holbach wrote: Hello everybody, are there any motu-sru bugs open that need a follow up about the new process? The new process was announced on March 7th [1]. https://launchpad.net/~motu-sru/+subscribedbugs suggest that there are still some SRUs in

Reminder: MOTU-Meeting tonight

Hi, just a quick reminder: tonight at 20.00h UTC a MOTU meeting is scheduled. Please add your agenda items to [1]. I've also just noticed, that there is an overlap with a Development Team meeting [2]. Maybe we could hold the motu meeting in #ubuntu-motu in case #ubuntu-meeting is busy?

Re: call for votes: KDE4 uploads to universe

Hi, (following up on -motu, to have the discussion there). On Friday 09 March 2007 10:26:45 Daniel Holbach wrote: I'd like to further discuss it. I think you have to make a distinction between stable everyday software and technology preview software. We had a couple of other examples in the

Re: REVU web page

Hi Morten, On Sunday 17 June 2007 12:06:50 Morten Kjeldgaard wrote: Hi, I am confused by the first integer present in the Comments column, which appears to have no relation to the actual number of comments on the package. That's right: It doesn't represent the number of comments per

REVU: pyrenamer (0.1-0ubuntu1) is NEW

Hi, Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:46:48 +0200 Source: pyrenamer Binary: pyrenamer Architecture: source Version: 0.1-0ubuntu1 Distribution: gutsy Urgency: low Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU Developers ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Changed-By: Adolfo González Blázquez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description:

Re: Ubuntu-motu post from [EMAIL PROTECTED] requires approval

Hi, there's one account merge mail in the moderation queue. I'm a little bit puzzled: Am Samstag 07 Juli 2007 11:00:45 schrieben Sie: Hello We received a request to merge the Launchpad account named 'MOTU-Media (ubuntu-motu)' -- which have registered the email address

Re: MOTU-Media

Hi, Am Samstag 07 Juli 2007 14:16:27 schrieb Marco Rodrigues: Hi! Please cancel this.. https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/2007-July/001875.html ok, I'v discarded the mail in the moderated queue. Thanks for the notification! Cheers, Stefan. signature.asc Description: This

upcoming REVU days

Hi, the next REVU days will be tomorrow on Monday, July 16th and one week later on July the 23rd. Again we'll be trying to flood the new queue by reviewing as many packages on REVU as possible, giving immiediate feedback to the package creators. If you are an ubuntu developer, please come

Re: REVU still down - Can't update sdlmame package

Hi Cesare, Am Donnerstag 16 August 2007 17:55:02 schrieb Cesare Falco: Hi all there, I have updated my package for SDLMame, which still lies in REVU, but I obviously have no way to upload it as the server is still down. Is there any way I can get it published for reviewing (i.e. another

tiber down, revu back up

Hi folks, as you may have read at [1], several community servers have been compromised and where thus taken offline. Tiber, the server running REVU was among these. However I don't know, if tiber was compromised as well, but I wouldn't say that it was too unlikely, since it also was still

retiring from MOTU Council

Hi folks, (CC-ing technical-board and community-council, as I'm not sure which board will need to take the next steps here) It has been both a great pleasure and honour to be a member of MOTU Council. However, as I've started working this year, I'm sad that I don't have the time for this

Re: compiz-fusion for feisty

Hi Christian, Am Sonntag 26 August 2007 11:35:48 schrieb Christian Heimanns: Hello All, I'm using Ubuntu Feisty and I've added the deb http://ppa.dogfood.launchpad.net/amaranth/ubuntu feisty main restricted universe multiverse repository. Using packages from PPA is not supported by ubuntu.

Re: Processing of gcc-snapshot_20070829-1_multi.changes

Hi, Am Sonntag 02 September 2007 16:09:20 schrieb Michael Bienia: On 2007-09-02 15:57:57 +0200, Stephan Hermann wrote: who uploaded a package to debian with ubuntu motu list address? Matthias Klose (doko) uploaded it and forgot to change back the Maintainer field. sorry from me, I was a

Re: Review of wine 0.9.44 on revu.tauware.de

Hi Stephan, Am Mittwoch 05 September 2007 20:28:11 schrieb Stephan Hermann: Good Evening MOTUs, Hi Scott, [..] Therefore, what I suggest is the following: Updating debian/control: Today, we have two binary packages, wine and wine-dev. I would like to see the two packages containing the

Re: Daniel Holbach moves to Community team - more focus on MOTU

Hi, Am Freitag 07 September 2007 15:36:01 schrieb Jono Bacon: Hi all, I am pleased to announce that Daniel Holbach, a long time leader in the MOTU project and friend of developers everywhere, has moved to my community team inside Canonical. Daniel will now be working as Ubuntu Community

Re: future of the Ubuntu Packaging Guide

Hi, Am Donnerstag 13 September 2007 09:38:06 schrieb Reinhard Tartler: Jordan Mantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 9/12/07, Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you considered moving the Ubuntu Packaging Guide to a debian package? They are using a docbook variant called

  1   2   3   >