** Changed in: nut (Debian)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
no sane default configuration
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85598
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu is a packager, not a developer. The right way to get this to
happen is for someone (who would have to be more motivated than I am) to
talk to the Debian SSH maintainers, or even the openssh developers
themselves. Options include forking (bad), making a completely new
package out of the pat
** Changed in: open-vm-tools (Debian)
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
--
should build kernel modules with dkms
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277556
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a direct subscriber.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mai
** Changed in: tomcat-native (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
bump tomcat-native to 1.1.15
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290078
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a direct subscriber.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-s
** Changed in: samba (Debian)
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
--
9.04 Jaunty Samba 2:3.3.0-3ubuntu2: files (permissions set to a=rwx) can only
be renamed by owner although their content can be changed by all
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332431
You received this bug notification because
** Changed in: php5 (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
PHP should be shipped with magic_quotes_gpc = Off in php.ini
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204479
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-
** Changed in: bind9 (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
Please merge bind9_9.5.0.dfsg.P2-5.1(main) from debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315711
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in ubuntu.
--
Ubu
** Changed in: dovecot (Debian)
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
--
Please guard the inetd.conf checks
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208411
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs
** Changed in: samba (Debian)
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
--
firefox 3.0.3 crashes (no SIG) on most pages w/ images when using nss_wins:
8.10beta AMD64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286119
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is su
** Changed in: debian
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
--
package samba4 None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/samba4.list] failed to
install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/nsstest', which is also in
package samba-tools
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278864
You received this bug not
** Changed in: debian
Status: Unknown => New
--
fusesmb - Not working properly.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198351
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-serv
** Changed in: samba (Debian)
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
--
gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-b
heh. Because I thought (wrongly, perhaps) that integration between
Dovecot and postfix would be nice...
Of course (and no need to rub it even more on my face, it is already
smeared all over ;-), I should have been more careful, and installed it
first on a test machine.
I wasn't, and I didn't. And
I cannot reproduce your bug:
* re-index - "su openldap slapindex"
This command doesn't work: the openldap account has a shell set to
/bin/false. Thus su openldap CMD doesn't work:
r...@t-slapd:~# su openldap " echo DDD"
r...@t-slapd:~#
Try sudo slapindex instead (and correct the ownership of
Wow, I have no idea what I was thinking back then.
Most likely, the problem was the switch to the slapd.d directory really
only lets you run slaptest once. Once the directory exists, you're stuck
with it. Unless of course you delete the directory, edit slapd.conf, and
run slaptest again.
I think
Could you post the original slapd.conf file (with private information
such as rootpw and rootdn obfuscated)?
** Summary changed:
- package slapd 2.4.11-0ubuntu6.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
post-installation script returned error exit status 1
+ package slapd 2.4.11-0ubuntu6.1 failed
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
Status: New => Triaged
--
slapd upgrade fails: chown: cannot access `olcDbDirectory\nolcDbDirectory': No
such file or directory
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322944
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
** Summary changed:
- slapd fails to upgrade if included schema files are no longer available
+ slapd fails to upgrade if included schema files are no longer available -
evolution.schema not available anymore
--
slapd fails to upgrade if included schema files are no longer available -
evolutio
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 239704 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239704
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 314917
package slapd 2.4.11-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade:
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 239704
slapd fails to upgrade if included schem
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 239704 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239704
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 239704
slapd fails to upgrade if included schema files are no longer available
--
package slapd 2.4.11-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.laun
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
I've successfully converted the attached slapd.conf. Even though
cn=module{1}.ldif doesn't exist, back_monitor is available in
cn=module{0}.ldif:
math...@intrepid-base:~/d/cn=config$ cat cn\=module\{0\}.ldif
dn:
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. However, I am closing it because the bug has been fixed
in the latest development version of Ubuntu - the Jaunty Jackalope.
openldap is at 2.4.15 in jaunty for now.
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status:
This bug is still in the current bind9-package for ubuntu-intrepid.
I checked the source (apt-get source bind9) and the "%" was not replaced with a
"$" in contrib/dlz/drivers/sdlz_helper.c.
So it's not possible to get bind9-dl-ldap to work.
Thank you
--
bind-dlz und ldap api
https://bugs.launch
Not a bug in openldap AFAICT.
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
Authentication fails in cups web admin module
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305014
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to op
We'd like to figure out what's causing this bug for you, but we haven't
heard back from you in a while. Could you please provide the requested
information? Thanks!
--
slaptest: bad configuration directory!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300671
You received this bug notification because you are a
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. However, I am closing it because the bug has been fixed
in the latest development version of Ubuntu - the Jaunty Jackalope.
ITS 5795 was fixed in 2.4.13. Jaunty has 2.4.15 now.
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mathias Gug (mathiaz)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
slapd init.d file fails to set -f or -F
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292364
You received this bug n
I did a re-install of Tomcat6 and got the same error. I then did a
complete removal and then installed again and it worked. Must be some
configuration file that is causing the problems.
--
While updating system, it reported an error.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323362
You received this bug
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. However, I am closing it because the bug has been fixed
in the latest development version of Ubuntu - the Jaunty Jackalope. It
won't be fixed in previous versions of Ubuntu because the package
doesn't fit the requir
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Unfortunately we can't fix it without more information.
Could you attach the content of the file /etc/ldap/slapd.conf (with
relevant private information such as passwords and rootdn obfuscated)?
** Changed in: op
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist => Medium
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
slapd fails to upgrade if included schema files are no longer available
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239704
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Tea
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 239704 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239704
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 239704
slapd fails to upgrade if included schema files are no longer available
--
slapd fails to upgrade when the configuration uses evolutionperson.schema
h
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu Dapper)
Assignee: Emanuele Gentili (emgent) => Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu Gutsy)
Assignee: Emanuele Gentili (emgent) => Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur)
Status: In Progress => Fix
@anders:
Is your CA certificate a X509 v1 cert? If so you may encounter bug 305264.
@Karl:
Do you still see the issue if you put *all* the CA certs in the CA cert file?
--
"TLS: peer cert untrusted or revoked (0x82)" error in Hardy's version of
ldap-utils
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257153
This bug report is being closed due to your last comment regarding this
being fixed with an update. For future reference you can manage the
status of your own bugs by clicking on the current status in the yellow
line and then choosing a new status in the revealed drop down box. You
can learn more a
@elvis:
According to the slapd log:
TLS: can't accept: Could not negotiate a supported cipher suite..
Could you post your slapd.conf file? Becareful to not include any
sensitive information such as passwords.
--
slapd + gnutls fails
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217159
You received this bug
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
"status" function for init scripts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203169
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a direct subscriber.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing li
Rather than removing apparmor, try adding to mysql's apparmor profile in
/etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.mysqld:
/var/run/samba/winbindd_privileged/pipe rw,
Then do:
$ sudo /etc/init.d/apparmor force-reload
$ sudo /etc/init.d/mysql stop
$ sudo /etc/init.d/mysql start
Please report back if this fixes
This bug was fixed in the package openvpn - 2.1~rc11-1ubuntu3
---
openvpn (2.1~rc11-1ubuntu3) jaunty; urgency=low
* debian/openvpn.init.d:
- Fix unexpected operator on startup (LP: #340120)
-- Michael JeansonMon, 09 Mar 2009
16:02:50 -0400
** Changed in: openvpn (Ubuntu)
This is because the gnutls doesn't support CA certificates stored in a
directory (contrary to openssl). Opening a task for the gnutls package.
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Also affects: gnutls26 (Ubuntu)
Importance:
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mathias Gug (mathiaz)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
apt-get produce an error when I tray install or unisntall slapd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298928
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
Here is the debdiff containing the patch.
** Attachment added: "openvpn_2.1~rc11-1ubuntu3.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23671320/openvpn_2.1%7Erc11-1ubuntu3.debdiff
--
OpenVPN unexpected operator on startup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340120
You received this bug notification bec
My name is Agustin Liguori and not Anthony
please check your email
sincerely
Agustin Liguori
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Dustin Kirkland
wrote:
> I spoke with upstream about this, and they indicated that this option is
> not used very often and if it's broken, it should be removed from the
@pit_hoessler:
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and comment on it. However your
report is a different issue. Would you please open a new bug report for it?
** Summary changed:
- package update-manager 1:0.87.24 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage:
SystemError in cache.commit():
** Changed in: openvpn (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Jeanson (mjeanson)
Status: New => In Progress
--
OpenVPN unexpected operator on startup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340120
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
** Attachment added: "openvpn init script"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23670467/openvpn
--
OpenVPN unexpected operator on startup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340120
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openvpn in ubunt
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: openvpn
When starting openvpn on Jaunty I get the following error message:
r...@sahal:/etc/openvpn# /etc/init.d/openvpn start
* Starting virtual private network daemon(s)...
openldap (2.4.15-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Steve Langasek ]
* Build against db4.7 instead of db4.2 at last! Closes: #421946.
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
Please migrate openldap2.3 to a later libdb version than libdb4.2
https://bugs.launchpa
I spoke with upstream about this, and they indicated that this option is
not used very often and if it's broken, it should be removed from the
upstream sources.
I have subscribed Anthony Liguori to this bug, who is the upstream qemu
maintainer and happens to also be a samba developer.
Anthony-
C
Thanks for taking the time to reply.
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 06:40:07PM -, C de-Avillez wrote:
> The problem is that on already-configured dovecot installations there is
> a chance that the dovecot-postifx.conf will not work out-of-the-box. I
> am sure that for *new* installations of dovecot
I updated to intrepid and cannot reproduce the bug anymore. The
installation of winbind 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.4 works without problem.
--
computer reboots during winbind configuration
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259538
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Te
The problem is that on already-configured dovecot installations there is
a chance that the dovecot-postifx.conf will not work out-of-the-box. I
am sure that for *new* installations of dovecot the provided d-p.conf
will work fine -- but this is not to be expected for existing installs.
But ideally
I've looked around and seen some valid concerns about incorporating a
large patchset like this into the Ubuntu packages, but:
1) It's real handy. I'm getting easy 2.5x boosts at home over a single-
switch gig-e network.
2) Upstream (openssh.com) doesn't seem to have any burning interest that
I c
Hi,
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 02:57:16PM -, C de-Avillez wrote:
> Package Version: dovecot-postfix_1%3a1.1.11-0ubuntu2_all.deb
> Expected Results: current dovecot configuration will stay active, user will
> be
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 02:21:58PM -, Doug Engert wrote:
> The real fix is to get the gnutls people to support certificate
> directories, like OpenSSL. Why the rush to convert to gnutls
> when it has so many issues. (Licencing issues are low on my list of
> reasons.)
Licensing was the main mot
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
apache2 SSI timefmt sometimes ignored
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258914
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mai
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: dovecot-postfix
Release of Ubuntu: Jaunty
Package Version: dovecot-postfix_1%3a1.1.11-0ubuntu2_all.deb
Expected Results: current dovecot configuration will stay active, user will be
warned to match & merge new configuration
Actual Results: existing confi
Mathias Gug wrote:
> One workaround is to put all of the CA certs in the trusted CA
> certificate file.
Yes, that is what we have had to do.
The real fix is to get the gnutls people to support certificate
directories, like OpenSSL. Why the rush to convert to gnutls
when it has so many issues. (L
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue
for you. Can you try with the latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance.
** Changed in
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue
for you. Can you try with the latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance.
** Changed in
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue
for you. Can you try with the latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance.
** Changed in
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue
for you. Can you try with the latest Ubuntu release, both using Nautilus
and smbc? Tha
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue
for you. Can you try with the latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance.
** Changed in
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue
for you. Can you try with the latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance.
** Changed in
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue
for you. Can you try with the latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance.
** Changed in
My apologies, I didn't see that in the bug comments. This bug report is
being closed due to your last comment regarding this being fixed with an
update. For future reference you can manage the status of your own bugs
by clicking on the current status in the yellow line and then choosing a
new stat
Sorry if the bug description was not clear. The reason for staring this
bug is not an attempt to fix this flaw in the smb protocol, but to have
Ubuntu fail gracefully, while providing an error which helps the user
diagnose, understand and correct the issue.
The error should attempt to explain the
Hi Joel,
Thanks for that - it was quite a while ago.
Think I already reported that I did a "fresh" instal of Gutsy and all is well?
Anyway, it is no longer an issue.
Cheers,
Geoff.
On Monday 09 March 2009 09:44:20 Joel Goguen wrote:
> Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping t
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: samba
samba 2:3.3.1-1ubuntu1
ubuntu 9.04 (alpha5-20090304)
Samba client and server both have the same hostname. This makes it
impossible for the client to resolve to the server. The end result is
that the client is shown the following
Confirmed based on upstream patch. I think we should get this into
Jaunty and SRU for Hardy/Intrepid. My imression based on the discussion
on the upstream ML is that this doesn't bite a lot of people, but when
it bites, it bites hard.
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Me
Accepted into hardy-proposed; please test and give feedback here. Please
see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
** Tags added: verification-needed
--
Mod_ssl randomly causes apache threads to use 100% of CPU
htt
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue
for you. Can you try with the latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance.
** Changed in
We'd like to figure out what's causing this bug for you, but we haven't
heard back from you in a while. Could you please provide the requested
information? Thanks!
--
crash application before upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237587
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
We'd like to figure out what's causing this bug for you, but we haven't
heard back from you in a while. Could you please provide the requested
information? Thanks!
--
gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281665
You received this bug notification because you a
Accepted into hardy-proposed; please test and give feedback here. Please
see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
** Tags added: verification-needed
--
getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
https://bu
This bug report is being closed due to your last comment regarding this
being fixed with a configuration change. For future reference you can
manage the status of your own bugs by clicking on the current status in
the yellow line and then choosing a new status in the revealed drop down
box. You can
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue
for you. Can you try with the latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance.
** Changed in
Did anyone test the current samba in intrepid-proposed? Does it fix this
issue? Does it introduce any regression for you?
--
firefox 3.0.3 crashes (no SIG) on most pages w/ images when using nss_wins:
8.10beta AMD64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286119
You received this bug notification becaus
I'm attaching the patch posted by Wietse Venema at the mailing list.
I don't know why, but I have 5 rejects applying the patch. The
substituted code was OK, but some lines where 2 or 3 lines below the
line-id's in the patch :-?
I corrected the .rej manually and the patch is working. Let me kn
Public bug reported:
Last month I had a "load average" issue in a postfix mail server (only runs
postfix service). Suddenly, load average started to raise and qmgr process
appeared on top of "top" taking 20-30% of CPU.
top - 18:19:54 up 7 days, 2:03, 2 users, load average: 4.94, 3.96, 4.02
Thanks for following up !
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
package samba 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
post-installation script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/304047
You received this bug notification
Hi Adam
there is no such tool:
$ sudo aptitude search ldap-auth-config
i ldap-auth-config- Config package for LDAP
authentication
$ sudo ldap-auth-config
sudo: ldap-auth-config: command not found
$ sudo su -
# ldap-auth-config
-su: ldap-auth-config: command not found
$ cat /et
** Changed in: nagios3 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
description missing in nagios config
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338704
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios3 in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs maili
83 matches
Mail list logo
