[Bug 463684] Re: openldap sections in ubuntu server guide not updated for packages in karmic

2010-03-11 Thread Graeme Humphries
Docs look better, but they also serve to highlight that the base config should be more fleshed out. That's a lot of non-trivial steps to get to a point where you can actually use your slapd install for something. -- openldap sections in ubuntu server guide not updated for packages in karmic

[Bug 463684] Re: openldap sections in ubuntu server guide not updated for packages in karmic

2010-02-22 Thread Graeme Humphries
I'm not as enraged as others here, but I agree with Yannick. If we had a debconf based base configuration for cn=config, and removed it, then it should be put back in. Clearly having it would be less problematic for most users than not having it. -- openldap sections in ubuntu server guide not

[Bug 442498] Re: karmic openldap cut-to-bone-and-beyond install, why ????

2010-02-02 Thread Graeme Humphries
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 463684 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463684 Why is this marked as a duplicate of a documentation bug? There are documentation issues here, to be sure, but this is also a useful configuration missing by default bug, which isn't covered by #463684. --

[Bug 448674] Re: VM is suspended after live migrate in Karmic

2010-01-21 Thread Graeme Humphries
Here's an interesting addition to this problem: In my cluster, one system is based on a core2duo CPU, while the other is based on an i7 920 CPU. When the VM is originally started on the i7, migration doesn't work. When it's originally started on the core2, it does. From this, I'm guessing that

[Bug 448674] Re: VM is suspended after live migrate in Karmic

2010-01-07 Thread Graeme Humphries
Ok, updated to the latest libvirt packages from PPA:dnjl/virtualization. Now, the migrate, then suspend/resume suggestion works for me. Still less than ideal, as it kills the whole live migration thing, but at least it doesn't totally kill my VMs anymore. -- VM is suspended after live migrate in

[Bug 448674] Re: VM is suspended after live migrate in Karmic

2009-11-28 Thread Graeme Humphries
This was with a hardy/amd64 guest OS. I haven't tried any other guests, because the bulk of our VMs are supposed to be LTS installs. -- VM is suspended after live migrate in Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448674 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

[Bug 448674] Re: VM is suspended after live migrate in Karmic

2009-11-27 Thread Graeme Humphries
I'm seeing behaviour that looks like this on karmic/amd64, only a suspend/resume doesn't fix the VM. It stays hard locked. I can connect to it on the virtual serial console or via VNC, and it shows what was there before the migration, but it never unlocks and starts working. -- VM is suspended

[Bug 489398] [NEW] Unable to use use LVM with DRBD block devices as PV

2009-11-27 Thread Graeme Humphries
Public bug reported: This is a bug reported in Debian and Redhat, which I'm currently seeing on fresh installs of Ubuntu/karmic. The details of my problem generally match the Debian bug report, which I'll link here. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Nov 27 15:12:25 2009

[Bug 489398] Re: Unable to use use LVM with DRBD block devices as PV

2009-11-27 Thread Graeme Humphries
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36181383/Dependencies.txt ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #533436 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=533436 ** Also affects: drbd8 (Debian) via

[Bug 489398] Re: Unable to use use LVM with DRBD block devices as PV

2009-11-27 Thread Graeme Humphries
/etc/lvm/lvm.conf filter suggestion from redhat bug works well, actually. After filtering out the block device my drbd device is based on, lvcreate works as expected. -- Unable to use use LVM with DRBD block devices as PV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489398 You received this bug notification

[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu

2009-06-11 Thread Graeme Humphries
Hey Kai-Cheung, Sorry I wasn't more explicit, but I *did* rebuild the required libraries from Tim's repo for jaunty. It still doesn't build properly for me. ;) I suspect that perhaps the build-deps on the packages aren't totally accurate, since I'm building on a fresh jaunty install inside a VM,

[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu

2009-06-10 Thread Graeme Humphries
I definitely agree about introducing into Karmic. That way there'll be some wider usage and testing before the next LTS. -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu

2009-06-10 Thread Graeme Humphries
Tim: Is it possible to get packages for jaunty into your repo? I'm getting errors trying to rebuild the packages on jaunty/amd64. It freaks out and generates a ton of errors trying to compile this: /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -DBUILD_NUM=\2009.161.2056\

[Bug 289470] Re: open-iscsi user-space does not match kernel module version

2008-11-25 Thread Graeme Humphries
Any update on when we'll see an updated package for this issue? -- open-iscsi user-space does not match kernel module version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289470 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-iscsi in ubuntu. --