** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1440381
** Changed in: heimdal (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to heimdal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1317534
Title:
del_enctype causes ipropd-slave crash
To manage
If you're referring to the alternatives files - Debian package -9 fixes
the cleanup of those.
** Changed in: heimdal (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
** Changed in: heimdal (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1335502
Title:
Samba4 does not work with IPv6
To manage notifications
** Bug watch added: Samba Bugzilla #10729
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10729
** Also affects: samba via
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10729
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Thiago,
Please don't subscribe me to bug email. I am only involved in the Debian
packaging of Samba and upstream, not in the Ubuntu packaging.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
Is this an ubuntu specific issue? subunit2junitxml on Debian just use
#!/usr/bin/python - in other words, Python 2.
** Changed in: subunit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
** Also affects: subunit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: subunit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: subunit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Aaron J. Zirbes (ajz) = (unassigned)
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
This was fixed in 3.5, long since available in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453747
Title:
** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1138905
Title:
managesieve segfault
To manage notifications
** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1235372
Title:
managesieve skipping of CRLF at end of
This is available upstream in Dovecot, so not a bug there.
** Changed in: dovecot
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1235401
Title:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 07:10:17AM -, Didier Roche wrote:
Everything is green but samba4 (when I tried to seed it yesterday). Just
ping me once the MIR is approved and I'll handle it.
The samba4 source package should no longer be necessary in trusty, just the
samba source
package (which is
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:53:14PM -, Matthias Klose wrote:
looks ok, runs the tests, has a symbols file,leaving the bindings in
universe
Override component to main
ldb 1:1.1.16-1 in trusty: universe/devel - main
1 publication overridden.
Override component to main
libldb1
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu
Is this really necessary - hostname is Essential, isn't it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/822613
Title:
etckeeper should depend on hostname
To manage
** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075456
Title:
wrong path given in README
** Summary changed:
- error is displayed if no changes are good to commit on post-install
+ [bzr] error when encountering large file
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
** Summary changed:
- Update Manager can not proceed if there is a lock on /etc
+ [bzr] breaks with locks on /etc
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/800656
Title:
** Branch linked: lp:~jelmer/ubuntu/raring/etckeeper/merge-0.64
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482986
Title:
Tracks some unnecessary/autogenerated files
To
** Summary changed:
- etckeeper tries/fails to autocommit on clean trees with shelved changes
+ [bzr] tries/fails to autocommit on clean trees with shelved changes
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
Note that samba4 build-depends on some packages that are not in main,
most notably subunit (MIR @ bug 780767), heimdal and libparse-yapp-perl.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075456
Title:
wrong path given in README
Hi Abhi,
wrt (1); the realm should usually be the uppercased version of the DNS domain
name, not the NetBIOS domain name.
(2) is fixed in newer versions of samba4, those present in quantal.
You can install samba4 as something other than a DC by selecting
standalone in debconf. The priority of
This is a samba-common issue, since the samba4 postinst script gets the
workgroup from samba-common's debconf config - and that has invalid
data.
** Package changed: samba4 (Ubuntu) = samba (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
Something killed bzr earlier, and there is still an open lock for it.
You might want to run sudo bzr break-lock /etc.
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
** Converted to question:
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/etckeeper/+question/202609
--
You
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #667999
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667999
** Also affects: bind9 (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667999
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Also affects: samba4 (Debian) via
This happens because samba-common doesn't read the workgroup from
smb.conf.
can you try running debconf-show samba-common ?
** Summary changed:
- installation successfull but package still complains
+ samba-common doesn't read workgroup from smb.conf
** Package changed: samba4 (Ubuntu) =
Hi Thomas, why the prefix? This is already associated with the samba4
package.
** Summary changed:
- samba4: integrate with bind package
+ integrate with bind package
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
Hi Tyler,
+1 on the diff, that looks good.
Note that an alternative to shipping the second patch is to update the
generated files from the package itself, so the diff isn't massive; this
would require adding make -C source3 samba3-idl as part of the build
step and adding libparse-yapp-perl to
Ideally we should have provision generate /etc/samba/named.conf.samba or
something alone those lines instead; this would make it unnecessary to
provide custom apparmor rules for the configuration file. It would be
nice if bind provided some sort of mechanism that allowed external
applications to
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = In Progress
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
https
nautilus is using libsmbclient, which is a part of Samba.
mount.cifs is unrelated to Samba; the mount utilities itself are a part
of the cifs-utils package, the actual implementation lives in the
kernel.
** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) = linux (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification
** Also affects: samba (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662243
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Changed in: samba
Importance: Unknown = Undecided
** Changed in: samba
Status: Fix Committed = New
** Changed in: samba
Remote watch: Debian
I don't think deja-dup should support SMB urls as it doesn't use gvfs as
far as I can tell.
You should indeed be able to use mount.cifs to mount the share, but that
doesn't involve Samba, just the cifs kernel module.
** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) = ubuntu
--
You received this bug
Can you attach your smb.conf? That way we should be able to see if this
is a bug in the configuration dialog or Samba.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945117
Title:
Sorry, my bad. I meant the usershare file that was created by the
nautilus plugin.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945117
Title:
can't edit files in my public guest
Thanks for the bug report.
Ideal would indeed be to update the tutorial to use bzr.
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Re-opening - this bug is still open upstream, and while there have been
changes in this area of the code I'm pretty sure none of them have
affected the rewriting of fields in SWAT.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because
Hi Timo, Jamie,
On 02/10/2012 08:22 PM, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
Jamie, thank you for the review!
Debian will have 1.5.16 as soon as I've passed the Debian Maintainership
process, if not uploaded by a sponsor earlier. I'm also hopeful that
squeeze will get 1.8.x which is what I'm preparing for
On 02/10/2012 09:30 PM, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
Jelmer, that would be great. I'll ping you early next week. Ding-libs
needs to go first and sssd after that.
Cool - I'm 'jelmer' on IRC.
ps. I have a whole lot of other packages too if you're interested to
sponsor them (389ds, freeipa related) ;)
The new feature flags feature might be useful for this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322327
Title:
Integrated permissions/ownership diff output for
Bazaar can indeed create hardlinks when it creates a checkout (so can
e.g. git) but it doesn't explicitly version the fact that hardlinks
exist somewhere. The warning here is about the latter category.
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #651168
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651168
** Also affects: etckeeper (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651168
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification
) = Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
** Package changed: etckeeper (Ubuntu) = bzr (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: bzr (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
https
Why did you end up with a pending lock - was there another bzr commit
instance still active for /etc?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/800656
Title:
Update Manager
libverto or libevent don't provide integration for talloc, which is one
of the key features of libtevent.
At the very least you would need a wrapper layer in libldb and sssd
around libevent or libverto.
Samba 4/OpenChange/Evolution-mapi (in universe) also rely on tevent and
the fact that libldb
Am 18/11/11 17:36, schrieb Scott Kitterman:
Looks like something that should be upstreamed to samba.
This doesn't affect upstream. The way in which the netbios name is
generated is specific to Debian/Ubuntu.
Cheers,
Jelmer
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I can confirm this on a ThinkPad X201 as well - and replacing cgroup-bin
with cgroup-lite fixed it for me too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libcgroup in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838729
Title:
x200
How does this relate to samba 4? The attached files don't seem to
reference it in any way.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/830129
Title:
package samba
to figure out the right directories,
rather than hardcoding them.
** Affects: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Assignee: Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu
This looks like a potential dupe of bug #596064.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/818617
Title:
package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade:
Nobody is actively working on this bug, either in Ubuntu or upstream.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17829
Title:
swat rewrites fields incorrectly
--
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 13:28 +, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
Okay, I think I've found the issue, based on a crash with liferea:-
At wins.c:95, we have
DEBUGLEVEL = 0;
Somewhere in source3/include/debug.h, we have
#define DEBUGLEVEL *debug_level
extern int DEBUGLEVEL;
In
On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 17:02 +, Johan Fornander wrote:
The source code in the official samba git (source/lib/util.c) seems to
use HOST_NAME_MAX and I found an inconsistency in the code base:
source/lib/replace/replace.h:
384 #ifndef HOST_NAME_MAX
385 #define HOST_NAME_MAX 255
Please open a different bug report; although it's related, it's a
different issue.
Nice catch, btw.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596064
Title:
nmbd fails to start
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 18:23 +, Cypher2 wrote:
Still happening in natty amd64
I have to start nmbd manually for full network share (load and
access)...
using the mkdir -p fix did not resolve...
I suspect you're hitting a different issue, please file a separate bug report.
Cheers,
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 20:49 +, Paul Tansom wrote:
Is there a fix for 10.04 LTS, which only runs 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.4? I
don't often reboot my server, but invariably forget to check that nmbd
is running when I do!
There is no fix for Maverick yet, but according to the Launchpad page
Chuck
libpam-smbpass doesn't have anything to do with whether or not your
computer will show up in the local network, I think that is a red
herring.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
Hi giox069,
That's a different issue than this bug (which is already fixed). Can you
please file a separate bug report about that?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596064
Kylepablo, this bug was fixed in 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2, so a version
newer than what you are running.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596064
Title:
nmbd fails to start
Are you sure you meant to mark this bug as a dupe? It's certainly a bug
in the samba source package and not in smbldap-tools (which doesn't ship
the schema file).
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 684225
missing samba.schema
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Tags added: hooks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322339
Title:
Integrated permissions/ownership reset on file operations for
etckeeper/bzr
--
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 709000
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 709000
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
Title:
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2
This might be related to my fix for bug 596064.
What does 'testparm' output for you? Do you have 'disable netbios' set?
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 707561
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has
to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707546
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
* You can
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
Thanks for the feedback. I managed to reproduce it, preparing a patch
now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
Title:
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
Title:
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
The attached patch fixes the issue for me.
** Patch added: proposed patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/707563/+attachment/1807356/+files/707563.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Chuck Short (zulcss) = Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596064
Title:
nmbd fails to start on boot
** Changed in: bzr (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322339
Title:
Integrated permissions/ownership reset on file operations
Debian doesn't include samba.schema either.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #190162
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=190162
** Also affects: samba (Debian) via
There's no need to compile samba from source to get the schema, as far
as I know upstream doesn't install the schema. You can get the schema
from the examples/ directory though.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 13:20 +, Firas Kraïem wrote:
Debian doesn't use that revision anymore, but they don't mention this
problem in the changelog for the newer ones, so I guess it is still
present. I will report it.
Debian doesn't force the use of --as-needed at link time (yet?) as far
as I
@munchkinguy The Samba-Team are the upstream developers of Samba, they
don't maintain Samba in Ubuntu. The Assigned field is usually used to
set the person that's actually actively working on an issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
Does anybody have a backtrace with the debugging symbols for
libnss_wins.so.2 installed? Having the relevant line numbers would be
very helpful in resolving this issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
