[Bug 457283] Re: x86_64 images should be presented a /dev/sdb, not a /dev/sda2

2012-07-11 Thread Andy Grimm
This issue is now being tracked upstream at http://eucalyptus.atlassian.net/browse/EUCA-2667 Please watch that issue for further updates. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.

[Bug 457283] Re: x86_64 images should be presented a /dev/sdb, not a /dev/sda2

2012-03-13 Thread graziano obertelli
** Also affects: eucalyptus/2.0 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: eucalyptus/2.0 Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.

[Bug 457283] Re: x86_64 images should be presented a /dev/sdb, not a /dev/sda2

2010-10-18 Thread Dmitrii Zagorodnov
** Changed in: eucalyptus Assignee: (unassigned) = Dmitrii Zagorodnov (dmitrii) -- x86_64 images should be presented a /dev/sdb, not a /dev/sda2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/457283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 457283] Re: x86_64 images should be presented a /dev/sdb, not a /dev/sda2

2010-01-30 Thread Scott Moser
I'll point out, that at least in the lucid version of eucalyptus, there is valid data stating where the ephemeral storage is in the metadata service. So, if the image is set to query metadata service for the ephemeral device, then this will work properly. I know, its a layer of indirection, but

[Bug 457283] Re: x86_64 images should be presented a /dev/sdb, not a /dev/sda2

2010-01-29 Thread Dustin Kirkland
Lowering priority since ec2-init works around this bug for Lucid for now. The issue is still present, though not trivially solved. Might be deferred until Lucid+1, unless a contained fix can be found. ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium = Low -- x86_64 images should be

[Bug 457283] Re: x86_64 images should be presented a /dev/sdb, not a /dev/sda2

2010-01-29 Thread Disconnect
Disagree on priority - that assumes that only ubuntu karmic (or later) images will ever be used, and breaks compatibility with every other ec2-compatible image out there. (And not breaks like annoyingly the hostname is 172 everything works fine, but actual firstboot scripts will fail, dogs and

[Bug 457283] Re: x86_64 images should be presented a /dev/sdb, not a /dev/sda2

2010-01-29 Thread Daniel Nurmi
This is really on the (we do our best to keep it)short-list of steps that one currently needs to perform in order to migrate images (to and from). Remember that images which are configured to run on xen will almost surely need some minor modifications (...kernel modules?) in order to boot

[Bug 457283] Re: x86_64 images should be presented a /dev/sdb, not a /dev/sda2

2009-11-30 Thread Chris Jones
fwiw this problem seems to happen with both the x86_64 and i386 images in the imagestore (oddly, the i386 one seems to be listed as x86_64 in euca-describe-images). -- x86_64 images should be presented a /dev/sdb, not a /dev/sda2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/457283 You received this bug

[Bug 457283] Re: x86_64 images should be presented a /dev/sdb, not a /dev/sda2

2009-11-13 Thread Thierry Carrez
** Also affects: eucalyptus Importance: Undecided Status: New -- x86_64 images should be presented a /dev/sdb, not a /dev/sda2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/457283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in

[Bug 457283] Re: x86_64 images should be presented a /dev/sdb, not a /dev/sda2

2009-11-05 Thread Nick Barcet
** Tags added: uec -- x86_64 images should be presented a /dev/sdb, not a /dev/sda2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/457283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 457283] Re: x86_64 images should be presented a /dev/sdb, not a /dev/sda2

2009-11-05 Thread Scott Moser
Just for informational purposes, the way that bug 458850 was fixed, if updates are done to Eucalyptus such that ephemeral storage is on /dev/sdb instead of /dev/sda2 ec2-init should correctly adjust. -- x86_64 images should be presented a /dev/sdb, not a /dev/sda2

[Bug 457283] Re: x86_64 images should be presented a /dev/sdb, not a /dev/sda2

2009-10-26 Thread Thierry Carrez
Fixing bug 458850 is needed to work around this issue in the instance itself. ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Triaged -- x86_64 images should be presented a /dev/sdb, not a /dev/sda2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/457283 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 457283] Re: x86_64 images should be presented a /dev/sdb, not a /dev/sda2

2009-10-21 Thread Dustin Kirkland
I can confirm this. fstab says /dev/sdb. But I do have /dev/sda2. I am able to mount /dev/sda2, but it is formatted ext2. The kvm command line on the node is: root 9680 1 0 Oct20 ?00:07:53 /usr/bin/kvm -S -M pc-0.11 -m 256 -smp 1 -name i-39AE0679 -uuid 8f8c4f4c-bbdb-