[Bug 616719] Re: slow group indexing when using huge ldap

2014-01-17 Thread Michael Lustfield
I've been noticing a similar issue. As our environment grows, it's becoming increasingly crippling. I filed a similar bug a while ago that might shed a small amount of light on the situation, but probably not actually get us anywhere. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=730053

[Bug 616719] Re: slow group indexing when using huge ldap

2011-04-06 Thread Martijn van Brummelen
Bug still exists time id real0m44.414s user0m4.152s sys 0m0.292s ** Changed in: libnss-ldap (Ubuntu) Status: Expired = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in Ubuntu.

[Bug 616719] Re: slow group indexing when using huge ldap

2010-12-31 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for libnss-ldap (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: libnss-ldap (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in ubuntu.

[Bug 616719] Re: slow group indexing when using huge ldap

2010-10-21 Thread Philipp Kaluza
Klaus: in an environment of this size, I strongly recommend against using libnss-ldap, because it just doesn't scale well enough. Please try installing nslcd and libnss-ldapd (notice the d), get it running, after that add nscd again, and evaluate if this better fits your needs. If it doesn't,

[Bug 616719] Re: slow group indexing when using huge ldap

2010-10-07 Thread Klaus Vink Slott
By reducing the number of groups in our setup we have managed to improve log on time a little. But login and using the id command is still terribly slow. This is a showstopper for us in offering Ubuntu as a choice in our university virtual hosting service. Please let me know if I can be of

[Bug 616719] Re: slow group indexing when using huge ldap

2010-08-13 Thread Klaus Vink Slott
Hi Scott, thanks for looking into this. I have never used Ubuntu in a environment like this before (actually I'v never really used Ubuntu) so I cant say for sure. But this guy http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1238322 might have been hit by the same issue in August last year. I do not

Re: [Bug 616719] Re: slow group indexing when using huge ldap

2010-08-13 Thread Mathias Gug
Excerpts from Klaus Vink Slott's message of Fri Aug 13 07:02:36 UTC 2010: I do not know if the problem is present upstream, actually I cant say for sure that the problem is in nss_ldap itself. But we do have a lot of OpenSUSE running in the same setup and have newer seen this problem

[Bug 616719] Re: slow group indexing when using huge ldap

2010-08-13 Thread Klaus Vink Slott
Yes. Based on a few tests done by hand on OpenSUSE, nscd speeds up the process a lot: When nscd is running I get a response within 100 mSec in average, sometimes down to 8 mSec and maximum 2.2 seconds. If I stop nscd, answer times ranges between 400 mSec and 2 seconds - the average around 800

[Bug 616719] Re: slow group indexing when using huge ldap

2010-08-12 Thread Klaus Vink Slott
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616719/+attachment/1485780/+files/Dependencies.txt -- slow group indexing when using huge ldap https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 616719] Re: slow group indexing when using huge ldap

2010-08-12 Thread Klaus Vink Slott
** Tags added: ldap ** Tags removed: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- slow group indexing when using huge ldap https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 616719] Re: slow group indexing when using huge ldap

2010-08-12 Thread Scott Moser
Klaus, Thank you for taking the time to make a good bug report. Do you know if this behaviour is a regression from a previous ubuntu release ? Do you know if this behaviour is present in the upstream nss_ldap code ? ** Changed in: libnss-ldap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium **