[Bug 823494] Re: Virt-manager upgrade 0.9.0 is not in sync with libvirt

2011-08-30 Thread Boris Derzhavets
** Package changed: libvirt (Ubuntu) = seabios (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823494 Title: Virt-manager upgrade 0.9.0 is not in sync with libvirt To

[Bug 823494] Re: Virt-manager upgrade 0.9.0 is not in sync with libvirt

2011-08-29 Thread Boris Derzhavets
Quoting : http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu- devel/2011-08/msg00710.html On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:03:10AM -0500, Rick Vernam wrote: it seems that qxl is not working correctly with any of the 0.15 releases thus far. this includes qemu and qemu-kvm. when I start qemu like so:

[Bug 823494] Re: Virt-manager upgrade 0.9.0 is not in sync with libvirt

2011-08-29 Thread Boris Derzhavets
View : http://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg73569.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823494 Title: Virt-manager upgrade 0.9.0 is not in sync with

[Bug 823494] Re: Virt-manager upgrade 0.9.0 is not in sync with libvirt

2011-08-29 Thread Boris Derzhavets
Installed bios.bin sould be replaced by downloaded from http://spice-space.org/download/seabios/ as of 08/10/11 root@host:/usr# ls -l ` find . -name bios.bin -print` lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 2011-08-20 15:47 ./share/qemu/bios.bin - ../seabios/bios.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 131072

[Bug 823494] Re: Virt-manager upgrade 0.9.0 is not in sync with libvirt

2011-08-18 Thread Boris Derzhavets
May be yes and might be no. Oneiric's X-Server can handle request for 32M vram coming from QXL device qemu-kvm 's userland process running Spice session. It works for install and for runtime. Patch is completely harmless for libvirt. I believe it's understandable. But as soon as amount

[Bug 823494] Re: Virt-manager upgrade 0.9.0 is not in sync with libvirt

2011-08-18 Thread Serge Hallyn
Hi Boris, can you attach the patch you are talking about? This bug will be blocked on getting spice packages synced from Debian, but I'm hoping to get that started today. ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Status: Won't Fix = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 823494] Re: Virt-manager upgrade 0.9.0 is not in sync with libvirt

2011-08-18 Thread Boris Derzhavets
# cat QXL-32M.patch --- libvirt-0.9.2.orig/src/conf/domain_conf.c 2011-08-13 15:47:00.036368913 +0400 +++ libvirt-0.9.2/src/conf/domain_conf.c2011-08-13 15:49:54.516368948 +0400 @@ -4519,7 +4519,7 @@ case VIR_DOMAIN_VIDEO_TYPE_QXL: /* QEMU use 64M as the minimal video

[Bug 823494] Re: Virt-manager upgrade 0.9.0 is not in sync with libvirt

2011-08-18 Thread Brian Murray
** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823494 Title: Virt-manager upgrade 0.9.0 is not in sync with libvirt To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 823494] Re: Virt-manager upgrade 0.9.0 is not in sync with libvirt

2011-08-18 Thread Boris Derzhavets
I went trough http://mentors.debian.net/package/spice-gtk it reproduces exactly packaging schema of spice-gtk-0.7.1-1.fc16.src.rpm. The same dependency bug which was resolved on Ubuntu a while ago (Spice-Gtk-0.6) popped up again. I saw this way of building Spice-Gtk-0.7 as soon as

[Bug 823494] Re: Virt-manager upgrade 0.9.0 is not in sync with libvirt

2011-08-17 Thread Serge Hallyn
Thanks for the bug report and information, Boris. We may sync libvirt 0.9.4-5 from debian sid this cycle. If understand your comments correctly that may fix your issue. ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Status: New = Won't Fix ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided =

[Bug 823494] Re: Virt-manager upgrade 0.9.0 is not in sync with libvirt

2011-08-13 Thread Boris Derzhavets
It's here ~/LIBVIRT/libvirt-0.9.2/src/conf/domain_conf.c . . . . . . case VIR_DOMAIN_VIDEO_TYPE_QXL: /* QEMU use 64M as the minimal video video memory for qxl device */ return 64 * 1024; -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 823494] Re: Virt-manager upgrade 0.9.0 is not in sync with libvirt

2011-08-13 Thread Boris Derzhavets
As of 08/13/11 patched version of Oneiric's Libvirt allocating by default 32M vram for QXL device uploaded to ppa:bderzhavets/qemu-git. Now installs and runtime may be run in QXL mode via VirtManager 0.9.0 and via spicec. XML updates using virsh commands are no longer required. -- You received

[Bug 823494] Re: Virt-manager upgrade 0.9.0 is not in sync with libvirt

2011-08-12 Thread Boris Derzhavets
After upgrade to xserver-xorg-video-qxl 0.0.14-1 X.Org X server -- QXL display driver there is some improvement. Switching to QXL in VM 0.9.0 automatically allocate 64M vram for QXL videomode virsh dumpxml VF15 shows :- video model type='qxl' vram='65536' heads='1'/ address

[Bug 823494] Re: Virt-manager upgrade 0.9.0 is not in sync with libvirt

2011-08-12 Thread Boris Derzhavets
My best is model type='qxl' vram='32768' heads='1'/ address type='pci' domain='0x' bus='0x00' slot='0x02' function='0x0'/ Works stable for Natty and F15 KVMs Attempts to hack source of VirtMan and Virtinst with no luck. I cannot find file (*.py ) from where the number 65536

[Bug 823494] Re: Virt-manager upgrade 0.9.0 is not in sync with libvirt

2011-08-10 Thread Boris Derzhavets
I guess new Virt-manager has problems with X-Server. It's possible to manage VMs via virsh and clients modules connections. Actually, it doesn't crash X-Server it makes a screen a kind of postmodern picture. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

[Bug 823494] Re: Virt-manager upgrade 0.9.0 is not in sync with libvirt

2011-08-09 Thread Boris Derzhavets
After the most recent upgrade usual VNC sessions via VirtMan gets broken. I am running qemu-kvm 0.15-rc1 for 7-8 days . It never happened before. Two boxes are affected in same way. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to