I'm going to go ahead and unsubscribe ubuntu-sponsors from this bug -
branch merge requests are automatically added to the sponsorship queue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
The broken code was moved into a different file in Lucid, and the
mistyped mask was fixed as well.
This problem only affects Karmic, and only if you explicitly specify an
IP address, don't specify a netmask, and give an IP address whose first
octet is between 128 and 192 (non-inclusive)
**
** Branch linked: lp:~serge-hallyn/ubuntu/maverick/multipath-tools/fix-
crash-on-shutdown
--
multipathd segfault
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488285
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in ubuntu.
--
You could potentially work around the regex misinterpretation issue by
using some more complex combinations of grep and awk and so forth, but
there's a better reason to not use getent | grep.
If /etc/nsswitch.conf is configured with a user or group database that
doesn't support enumerating users
Oh wait...I'm supposed to un-assign it to myself? *sigh* So confusing :)
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
** Package changed: ubuntu = krb5 (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Evan
Public bug reported:
Please sync kerberos-configs 2.2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Explanation of FeatureFreeze exception:
kerberos-configs currently includes the krb4-config package in
Ubuntu. Since Karmic contains krb5 version 1.7, which doesn't come
with krb4, it doesn't make sense to
Hmm...apparently not - I would have expected the package to fail to
install, but it seems to just provide a useless configuration. Oh well -
this can wait until Lucid.
** Changed in: kerberos-configs (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
FFe: Sync kerberos-configs 2.2 (main) from
This is a bug in the packages that still depend on libkrb53, not krb5
itself. root-system is one of only two that still have this problem.
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
missing binary transition package libkrb53
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464426
You received
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 462059 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462059
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 462059
libkrb53 package required instead of libkrb5-3 in Karmic
--
root-system-rootd has missing dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477315
You
This shouldn't be a problem. We're still in sync phase for Ubuntu
Lucid, so the new krb5 package will get automatically pulled in when
it hits Debian testing.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Sam Hartman hartm...@debian.org wrote:
I released 1.7+dfsg-3 to Debian unstable. That includes a fix to
I think the patch is a little extensive to be directly uploaded as a
Karmic SRU, but I'll look at pulling a SRU patch together for just the
bugfixes.
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
package libkrb5-dev 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-3 failed to install/upgrade: failed to
delete `/usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.dpkg-tmp': Read-only file system
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341432
You received this bug notification because
%7Ebeta3-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Confirmed
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = (unassigned)
--
Strange behavior of libkrb5 since karmic ...
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489418
You received this bug notification
** Changed in: open-vm-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
** Changed in: open-vm-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder)
--
should build kernel modules with dkms
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277556
You received this bug notification because you
grexk: thanks for the patch. A few nits for future reference:
- LP closers are generally of the form (LP: #nn) - you didn't have the hash
- It looks like you added a superfluous line to set SRC_VERSION in debian/rules
- Your version number was appropriate for a PPA upload, but not for
I don't see how this is a bug. Debian and Ubuntu in general try to
enable as many features of software packages as they can, almost
everything has Kerberos authentication of some form or another as a
feature, and because of how libraries and Debian dependencies work,
anything that /supports/
Here's my last debdiff rebased on top of the recent security update.
I've also dispatched builds to my PPA
(https://launchpad.net/~broder/+archive/ubuntu-tests), which should be
running shortly.
** Attachment added: krb5_1.7dfsg~beta3-1ubuntu0.2.debdiff
It sounds like the secd you're using only supports single DES. Single
DES has been deprecated for over 10 years now as a cipher, due to its
very short key length. I would highly encourage you to upgrade your
infrastructure to a more secure encryption type.
If you simply must continue using your
** Also affects: nagios3 (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: nagios3 (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: nagios3 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Description changed:
- Description: Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS
- Release: 12.04
+ [Impact]
+ Under nagios 3.2.3 with state retention enabled, any host aliases or display
names assigned to a host would be persisted into the retention file, and would
supersede subsequent configuration changes.
Thanks for the approvals, Sebastian and Brian.
I've repeated the steps I outlined in the description and confirmed that
the bug does not occur with the packages in -proposed. I've also
installed the packages in our production nagios server and confirmed
that things seem to more or less work as
21 matches
Mail list logo