[Bug 468197] Re: ufw blocks samba in karmic default installation

2009-11-04 Thread maihacke
Okay, I thought ufw was enable during the samba installed. I did not install or activate it manual. I think it would be to hard to figure out why it was enabled on my system. I second, that a firewall should not open any ports automatically without user interaction. If samba does not activate

[Bug 468197] Re: ufw blocks samba in karmic default installation

2009-11-01 Thread maihacke
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34850273/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34850274/XsessionErrors.txt -- ufw blocks samba in karmic default installation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/468197 You

[Bug 468197] Re: ufw blocks samba in karmic default installation

2009-11-01 Thread maihacke
** Also affects: ufw Importance: Undecided Status: New -- ufw blocks samba in karmic default installation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/468197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. --

[Bug 468197] Re: ufw blocks samba in karmic default installation

2009-11-01 Thread Jamie Strandboge
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This is not a bug in samba or in ufw, but rather a local configuration issue. You had ufw enabled, which blocks packets. You therefore need to adjust your firewall to allow samba connections. See

[Bug 468197] Re: ufw blocks samba in karmic default installation

2009-11-01 Thread maihacke
Hi, thank you for your answer. I think it is atleast an documentation issue then. If I install samba and samba suggests ufw, which in fact blocks samba the default configuration isn't working. The samba ufw profile should be activated by default or the user should get an info that he has to do