[Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-09-11 Thread Frederic Bohe
Please see http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut- upsuser/2012-September/007909.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985 Title: usbhid-ups regression (APC

Re: [Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-09-11 Thread Arnaud Quette
Dmitry, 2012/9/11 Frederic Bohe 915...@bugs.launchpad.net Please see http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut- upsuser/2012-September/007909.html please check the above reference pointed by Fred. This is the solution you were waiting for. To Ubuntu packagers fellows: the patch to be

[Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-06-13 Thread Dmitry Andreychuk
Attaching logs for svn3663 + patch ** Attachment added: usbhid-ups_3663_patch2.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+attachment/3187683/+files/usbhid-ups_3663_patch2.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

Re: [Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-06-11 Thread Arnaud Quette
2012/6/9 Dmitry Andreychuk 915...@bugs.launchpad.net I'll test it next week, as soon as i get to the hardware. great, thanks. cheers, -- Arnaud -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.

[Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-06-09 Thread Dmitry Andreychuk
I'll test it next week, as soon as i get to the hardware. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985 Title: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS) To manage notifications

[Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-06-08 Thread Arnaud Quette
Dimitry, can you please test the last patch I sent (apc-hid-overflow-2.diff) and report the output? cheers, --- Arnaud ** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Arnaud Quette (aquette) ** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- You received this bug

[Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-05-05 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985

[Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-01-24 Thread Dmitry Andreychuk
The patch didn't change the output. I took a look at the sources: libusb_get_report() returns libusb_strerror(ret, __func__) which returns 0 for ret == -EOVERFLOW. Then in refresh_report_buffer(): r == 0 and the patch doesn't work. The log message would be incorrect anyway because r is not the

Re: [Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-01-23 Thread Arnaud Quette
2012/1/19 Dmitry Andreychuk 915...@bugs.launchpad.net: Attaching logs with power failure for versions 2.6.1-2ubuntu2 and 2.6.3. Power failures and power returns are marked with NOTE in the logs. I noticed that UPS.PowerSummary.RemainingCapacity came with input report only once. The device

[Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-01-23 Thread Ubuntu Foundation's Bug Bot
The attachment apc-hid-overflow.diff of this bug report has been identified as being a patch. The ubuntu-reviewers team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can review the patch. In the event that this is in fact not a patch you can resolve this situation by removing the tag

[Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-01-19 Thread Dmitry Andreychuk
Attaching logs with power failure for versions 2.6.1-2ubuntu2 and 2.6.3. Power failures and power returns are marked with NOTE in the logs. I noticed that UPS.PowerSummary.RemainingCapacity came with input report only once. The device didn't send it upon changes for some reason. ** Attachment

[Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-01-19 Thread Dmitry Andreychuk
** Attachment added: usbhid-ups_2.6.3_power_failure.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+attachment/2682553/+files/usbhid-ups_2.6.3_power_failure.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in

Re: [Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-01-18 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Sergey, cc'ing NUT users list, since others may be interested in the topic (for those, follow the bug link below). 2012/1/16 Dmitry Andreychuk 915...@bugs.launchpad.net: Hi Arnaud, Thanks for your reply! Attaching output for 2.6.0-1ubuntu3. ** Attachment added:

[Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-01-17 Thread Dave Walker
** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985 Title: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS) To manage notifications

[Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-01-16 Thread Dmitry Andreychuk
Hi Arnaud, Thanks for your reply! Attaching output for 2.6.0-1ubuntu3. ** Attachment added: usbhid-ups_2.6.0-1ubuntu3.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+attachment/2676822/+files/usbhid-ups_2.6.0-1ubuntu3.log -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-01-13 Thread Dmitry Andreychuk
** Attachment added: usbhid-ups.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985/+attachment/2672328/+files/usbhid-ups.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985 Title: