Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
Included are 7 patches which adds support for AVR32 architecture in uClibc.
The patches is generated against the latest snapshot (20071105).
Is there any reason why there has been no comments, refusals or commits
of the 7 patches?
cut
Any feedback are very
Ping. This patch
http://www.uclibc.org/lists/uclibc/2007-October/018617.html is pending
review.
Do you have a test case to show how it fails and then it passes when
the patch is applied? Thanks.
-Steve
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
Ping. This patch
http://www.uclibc.org/lists/uclibc/2007-October/018617.html is pending
review.
--
Joseph S. Myers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Steven J. Hill wrote:
Ping. This patch
http://www.uclibc.org/lists/uclibc/2007-October/018617.html is pending
review.
Do you have a test case to show how it fails and then it passes when
the
(Might not apply when objects are PIC by default as on MIPS; tested on
ARM.)
yes. I can confirm that on ARM.
Please confirm that the patch works and then commit. Thanks Khem.
-Steve
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
Included are 7 patches which adds support for AVR32 architecture in uClibc.
The patches is generated against the latest snapshot (20071105).
Is there any reason why there has been no comments, refusals or commits
of the 7 patches?
Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
Included are 7 patches which adds support for AVR32 architecture in
uClibc.
The patches is generated against the latest snapshot (20071105).
Is there any reason why there has been no comments, refusals or
