Re: PATCH: ARM INTERNAL_SYSCALL cleanup

2008-04-22 Thread Bernhard Fischer
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:33:06AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: Hi There was some duplication when defining INTERNAL_SYSCALL macro for ARM. I have tried to clean this up with attached patch. Tested on ARM EABI and ARM OABI. Deleted commented out code too. OK for trunk ? Ok, from the looks (didn't test

RE: [PATCH] splice, vmsplice and tee for i386

2008-04-22 Thread Peter Kjellerstedt
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernhard Fischer Sent: den 21 april 2008 14:21 To: Timo Teräs Cc: uclibc@uclibc.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] splice, vmsplice and tee for i386 On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:33:59PM +0300, Timo Teräs wrote:

Re: Issues on linuxthreads

2008-04-22 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
Will Newton wrote: On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 7:09 AM, Carmelo Amoroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, recently there have been reported several issues on libpthread segfaulting while running simple application. It has been discovered that users were using linuxthreads implementation

Re: Issues on linuxthreads

2008-04-22 Thread Will Newton
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW linuxthreads works for me with the attached patch. It's also better supports architectures with STACK_GROWS_UP such as hppa. Hello, that means that it needs to build all files with -DSHARED, right ? I'd

Re: Issues on linuxthreads

2008-04-22 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
Will Newton wrote: On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW linuxthreads works for me with the attached patch. It's also better supports architectures with STACK_GROWS_UP such as hppa. Hello, that means that it needs to build all files

Re: [PATCH] Implement error_print_progname

2008-04-22 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
Will Newton wrote: Further to the changes to error.c to fix bug #1869 it would be nice if uClibc supported error_print_progname. The attached patch aims to do that. Hi Will, since a long time nobody further replied to this topic. I was convinced (likely erroneously) about its goodness, so

Re: [PATCH] splice, vmsplice and tee for i386

2008-04-22 Thread Timo Teräs
Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: I'll apply this patch in a few days unless i hear something controversial. Any particular reason to uncomment sync_file_range() in fcntl.h? It does not seem to be part of the patch. Also, you might as well take the latest fcntl.h from glibc while at it to get a

Re: [PATCH] splice, vmsplice and tee for i386

2008-04-22 Thread Khem Raj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You might also update the license header to include 2008 as well. Timo Teräs wrote: Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: I'll apply this patch in a few days unless i hear something controversial. Any particular reason to uncomment sync_file_range() in

Re: [PATCH] splice, vmsplice and tee for i386

2008-04-22 Thread Bernhard Fischer
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:14:22AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You might also update the license header to include 2008 as well. does splice() work if !LFS ? ___ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org

command to build uClibc

2008-04-22 Thread xrin oscar
Hi,   when I run 'make' command to build uClibc, the following appears. @localhost uClibc-0.9.28.3]$make CROSS=armv5l-linux-   .../../include/asm/posix_types.h:10:error: redefinition of typedef '__kernel_ino_t' ../../include/bits/kernel_types.h:11:error: redefinition of typedef '__kernel_ino_t'