I feel I missed a train.
Yoshii, are you able to try with older gcc ? ...
I built gcc-3.4.6 for testing, but none older than it.
... or was you able to produce \n a testcase ?
No.
I couldn't find nothing other than CRT_CALL_STATIC_FUNCTIONs between
this prologue and epilogue, which is
On (05/09/08 15:24), Corinna Schultz wrote:
Hello, all.
I'm trying to track down a bug in the fadvise functions. I'm seeing a
failure in the LTP tests for posix_fadvise and posix_fadvise64, on a
ppc 32 machine. The specific failures are:
* in the posix_fadvise64 tests, the function
We use uClibc on our 64-way cores, and it seems fine :-)
We are currently shipping 0.9.28.2, and are in development with the SVN
tip of uClibc-nptl.
On 9/5/2008 5:45 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
I'm trying to obtain a rough measure of uclibc's maturity on SMP systems. I
see some SMP hooks in the
