Re: [PATCH] posix_favise{64} error handling fixes [was Re: fadvise gclibc vs uclibc]

2008-09-18 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: Khem Raj wrote: On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Corinna Schultz wrote: Quoting Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED]: a colleague of mine is right now working to produce a patch for posix_fadvise to fix all LTP tests using

Re: pthreads stress test hangs on read() returning EINTR

2008-09-18 Thread Khem Raj
On (16/09/08 08:16), Chase Douglas wrote: On Sep 16, 2008, at 3:22 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 05:30:46PM -0400, Chase Douglas wrote: Hello all, I submitted this as a bug report on uclibc.org (http://busybox.net/bugs/view.php?id=4994). I wanted to be sure

Re: [PATCH] Xtensa strcoll problem with LOCALE support

2008-09-18 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
Chris Zankel wrote: Hi Carmelo, Sorry, I also forgot to add the 'signed-off' line. Looking at the log file, however, it seems that less than 5% of the commits are 'signed-off'. What's the policy? I'm used to sign-off my work being this a common/required policy on kernel side. I think

Re: [PATCH] posix_favise{64} error handling fixes [was Re: fadvise gclibc vs uclibc]

2008-09-18 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 01:55:56PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: Corinna Schultz wrote: Quoting Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED]: a colleague of mine is right now working to produce a patch for posix_fadvise to fix all LTP tests using posix_fadvise[64]. Indeed LTP tests expect that, when

Re: [PATCH] posix_favise{64} error handling fixes [was Re: fadvise gclibc vs uclibc]

2008-09-18 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 01:55:56PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: Corinna Schultz wrote: Quoting Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED]: a colleague of mine is right now working to produce a patch for posix_fadvise to fix all LTP tests using posix_fadvise[64].

Re: [PATCH] posix_favise{64} error handling fixes [was Re: fadvise gclibc vs uclibc]

2008-09-18 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 03:29:09PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: Absolutely agreed. IIRC I should now use __inline__ keyword, right? yes. ___ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

Re: pthreads stress test hangs on read() returning EINTR

2008-09-18 Thread Chase Douglas
On Sep 18, 2008, at 2:36 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On (16/09/08 08:16), Chase Douglas wrote: On Sep 16, 2008, at 3:22 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 05:30:46PM -0400, Chase Douglas wrote: Hello all, I submitted this as a bug report on uclibc.org

Re: pthreads stress test hangs on read() returning EINTR

2008-09-18 Thread Khem Raj
On (18/09/08 13:44), Chase Douglas wrote: On Sep 18, 2008, at 2:36 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On (16/09/08 08:16), Chase Douglas wrote: On Sep 16, 2008, at 3:22 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 05:30:46PM -0400, Chase Douglas wrote: Hello all, I submitted this as a bug