Re: __isinfl and __isnanl

2009-01-14 Thread Natanael Copa
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 12:44 +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:44:06AM +0100, Natanael Copa wrote: Hi, I tried to compile kvm-82 against uclibc-0.9.30. Seems like it could work except that it needs 2 un implemented funcs __isinfl and __isnanl. Does nyone

uclibc-nptl build error on arm

2009-01-14 Thread Mikael Lund Jepsen, ICCC
Hi all, I've brought down the uclibc-nptl branch from cvs today and hacked buildroot (snapshot from 20081215) a bit to compile it. I'm compiling for ARM against a 2.6.23.16 kernel, but run into this error: In file included from libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/pthread/sigaction.c:31:

Adding shared memory implementation

2009-01-14 Thread Mikael Lund Jepsen, ICCC
Hi all, I cannot see the shm_open / shm_unlink functions implemented in librt. Is there any reason (bloat, ?) for not including these? I've tried taking shm_open.c and shm_unlink.c from newlib and dropped them in librt, and so far it seems to be working as expected. I have not done any

Re: Adding shared memory implementation

2009-01-14 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
Mikael Lund Jepsen, ICCC wrote: Hi all, I cannot see the shm_open / shm_unlink functions implemented in librt. Is there any reason (bloat, ?) for not including these? as simply it is reported in uClibc_vs_SuSv3.txt, they are optional and simply not implemented until now. I've tried taking

Re: [PATCH] ldso - adding ARCH_NEEDS_BOOTSTRAP_RELOCS define

2009-01-14 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
m m wrote: Hi, I might be missing smth, but I still dont see those changes in the trunk. you are right.. probably I was sleeping. Applied in re 24833. sorry for delay. Carmelo Actually this might be just my ignorance of the uclibc project devel in global.. Are you using trunk for

Re:

2009-01-14 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On Wednesday 14 January 2009 17:07, Natanael Copa wrote: Hi, This test program segfaults for me on x86, hardened gcc-4.3.2 and uclibc-0.9.30: #include stdio.h #include ctype.h int main(void) { printf(%i\n, isalnum(0x1)); return 0; } If the ctype.h include is

Re: uclibc-nptl build error on arm

2009-01-14 Thread Khem Raj
FWIW rev 24450 is the last working version on arm. We were planning to merge in branch into head You might want to stick to above rev Thx -Khem On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote: Mikael Lund Jepsen, ICCC wrote: Hi all, I've brought down the

Re: your mail

2009-01-14 Thread Khem Raj
On (14/01/09 17:07), Natanael Copa wrote: Hi, This test program segfaults for me on x86, hardened gcc-4.3.2 and uclibc-0.9.30: #include stdio.h #include ctype.h int main(void) { printf(%i\n, isalnum(0x1)); return 0; } If the ctype.h include is commented out it