On Wednesday 11 March 2009 23:41:39 Sagar Borikar wrote:
Hi,
We wanted to add NPTL support on our platform built in uClibc. While
browsing, I figured out that 0.9.30 was supposed to merge the
uclibc-nptl branch. But in the sources I don't see that. Can anyone
let me know the status?
Its not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Khem Raj wrote:
On Wednesday 11 March 2009 23:41:39 Sagar Borikar wrote:
Hi,
We wanted to add NPTL support on our platform built in uClibc. While
browsing, I figured out that 0.9.30 was supposed to merge the
uclibc-nptl branch. But in the
James Chapman wrote:
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 05:07:03PM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
you may try the following patch from Colin
The fix is to change all the __inline__ directives in
ldso/ldso/mips/dl-sysdep.h to inline __attribute__((always_inline))
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Khem Raj wrote:
On Wednesday 11 March 2009 23:41:39 Sagar Borikar wrote:
Hi,
We wanted to add NPTL support on our platform built in uClibc. While
browsing, I
On Thursday 12 March 2009 03:26:00 James Chapman wrote:
James Chapman wrote:
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 05:07:03PM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
you may try the following patch from Colin
The fix is to change all the __inline__ directives in
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 03:48:26 pm H.Heinold wrote:
arm-linuxthreads.patch
Applied
linuxthreads-changes.patch
Already in svn
pthread_atfork.patch
Please explain this change.
libpthread/linuxthreads/sysdeps/pthread/bits/libc-lock.h
is a total MESS, can't understand wtf is going on there.
