On February 6, 2015 12:04:30 AM GMT+01:00, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot....@gmail.com> wrote: >On February 5, 2015 6:57:53 PM GMT+01:00, Andy Voltz ><andy.vo...@timesys.com> wrote: >>What is the current release process for uClibc? >> >>I'm looking to bump our build system to a newer uClibc version, but >>there >>are no new release tags since 0.9.33.2. It seems like the 0.9.33 >branch >>could be treated as version 0.9.33.3, but there was never a tag, and > >We will have a 0.9.33.3 off the 0.9.33 branch. > >>now >>master is 0.9.33.4-git. >> >>Is the process to create a branch for the version once it's >development >>is >>complete? I'd rather not use 0.9.33 branch if it is some abandoned / >>unstable effort, but at the same time the master branch seems active >>enough >>to not treat as a stable release. > >I consider master pretty stable and intend to have a new stable release >of a 0.9.34 off master hopefully this month.
Changing babies nappies let's make this start of march... m68k still hitting .sgot binutils asserts though but on the plus side major arches seem to do well, from cursory testing. Thanks, _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
