Re: [Buildroot] uClibc build verbosity control

2015-04-29 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On 28 April 2015 at 08:38, Vineet Gupta vineet.gup...@synopsys.com wrote: On Tuesday 28 April 2015 01:46 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On April 27, 2015 11:21:10 AM GMT+02:00, Waldemar Brodkorb w...@openadk.orgmailto:w...@openadk.org wrote: Hi Vineet, Vineet Gupta wrote, Hi,

Re: [Buildroot] uClibc build verbosity control

2015-04-28 Thread Vineet Gupta
On Tuesday 28 April 2015 01:46 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On April 27, 2015 11:21:10 AM GMT+02:00, Waldemar Brodkorb w...@openadk.orgmailto:w...@openadk.org wrote: Hi Vineet, Vineet Gupta wrote, Hi, uClibc verbosity control V=xx is different from other mainstream projects:

Re: [Buildroot] uClibc build verbosity control

2015-04-27 Thread Waldemar Brodkorb
Hi Vineet, Vineet Gupta wrote, Hi, uClibc verbosity control V=xx is different from other mainstream projects: namely Busybox and Linux kernel. To print full cmdlines (when debugging obscure toolchain issues) we need to pass V=2 whereas kernel/busybox take V=1. Can this be changed (I

Re: [Buildroot] uClibc build verbosity control

2015-04-27 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On April 27, 2015 11:21:10 AM GMT+02:00, Waldemar Brodkorb w...@openadk.org wrote: Hi Vineet, Vineet Gupta wrote, Hi, uClibc verbosity control V=xx is different from other mainstream projects: namely Busybox and Linux kernel. To print full cmdlines (when debugging obscure toolchain issues)