Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARC Moving to @pcl relocations

On 07/28/2016 03:04 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >> Indeed your 2/2 seems to be the most "past-proof" code change. So I >> >would think it >> >is indeed better and is something I should have done in the first >> >place. >> > >> >@Alexey, @Vlad what say you ? > uClibc traditionally supports

Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARC Moving to @pcl relocations

On July 28, 2016 8:50:41 PM GMT+02:00, Vineet Gupta wrote: >Hi Andrew, > >On 07/28/2016 11:20 AM, Andrew Burgess wrote: >> This is a slightly odd series of 2 patches. The two patches are >> actually alternative solutions to the same problem. I'm keen to see >> one

Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARC Moving to @pcl relocations

Hi Andrew, On 07/28/2016 11:20 AM, Andrew Burgess wrote: > This is a slightly odd series of 2 patches. The two patches are > actually alternative solutions to the same problem. I'm keen to see > one of these merged, but I don't know which method would be preferred. > > This commit aims to

[PATCH 0/2] ARC Moving to @pcl relocations

This is a slightly odd series of 2 patches. The two patches are actually alternative solutions to the same problem. I'm keen to see one of these merged, but I don't know which method would be preferred. This commit aims to address an issue that was introduced / mentioned in commit