On November 19, 2014 11:38:38 PM GMT+01:00, Ed W li...@wildgooses.com wrote:
On 19/11/2014 15:52, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On 18 June 2012 17:45, Ed W li...@wildgooses.com wrote:
I remain *interested*, but I'm tied up with a bunch of deadlines and
not a
proper build environment to test
On 18 June 2012 17:45, Ed W li...@wildgooses.com wrote:
On 18/06/2012 16:28, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On 6 October 2011 15:40, Bernhard Reutner-Fischerrep.dot@gmail.com
wrote:
This is a completely untested variant to hopefully speed-up
fgets_unlocked and it's users by not doing
On 19/11/2014 15:52, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On 18 June 2012 17:45, Ed W li...@wildgooses.com wrote:
I remain *interested*, but I'm tied up with a bunch of deadlines and not a
proper build environment to test under... For reference it was killing me
with regards to modprobe, but I
On 18/06/2012 16:28, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On 6 October 2011 15:40, Bernhard Reutner-Fischerrep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
This is a completely untested variant to hopefully speed-up
fgets_unlocked and it's users by not doing char-IO as was done before.
Since we still rely on fgets for
This is a completely untested variant to hopefully speed-up
fgets_unlocked and it's users by not doing char-IO as was done before.
Since we still rely on fgets for getdelim (instead of using the common
guts of fgets_unlocked with the given delimiter plus surounding realloc
loop) we are still
