Re: Issues on linuxthreads

2008-04-22 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
Will Newton wrote: On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 7:09 AM, Carmelo Amoroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, recently there have been reported several issues on libpthread segfaulting while running simple application. It has been discovered that users were using linuxthreads implementation

Re: Issues on linuxthreads

2008-04-22 Thread Will Newton
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW linuxthreads works for me with the attached patch. It's also better supports architectures with STACK_GROWS_UP such as hppa. Hello, that means that it needs to build all files with -DSHARED, right ? I'd

Re: Issues on linuxthreads

2008-04-22 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
Will Newton wrote: On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW linuxthreads works for me with the attached patch. It's also better supports architectures with STACK_GROWS_UP such as hppa. Hello, that means that it needs to build all files

Re: Issues on linuxthreads

2008-04-21 Thread Khem Raj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Carmelo Amoroso wrote: Hi All, recently there have been reported several issues on libpthread segfaulting while running simple application. It has been discovered that users were using linuxthreads implementation instead of (stable ?)

Re: Issues on linuxthreads

2008-04-21 Thread Jonas Holmberg
Khem Raj wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Carmelo Amoroso wrote: Hi All, recently there have been reported several issues on libpthread segfaulting while running simple application. It has been discovered that users were using linuxthreads implementation instead of