On September 17, 2015 11:52:55 PM GMT+02:00, Rich Felker
wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:27:40PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>wrote:
>> On September 17, 2015 6:16:48 PM GMT+02:00, Yuriy Kolerov
> wrote:
>> >Hi Rich.
>> >
>> >fallocate must
] On Behalf Of Rich Felker
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 12:53 AM
To: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Cc: Yuriy Kolerov; uclibc@uclibc.org; vineet.gup...@synopsys.com;
alexey.brod...@synopsys.com; francois.bed...@synopsys.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] libc: fix setting return value and errno in fallocate
uclibc.org; vineet.gup...@synopsys.com; alexey.brod...@synopsys.com;
francois.bed...@synopsys.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] libc: fix setting return value and errno in fallocate()
On September 16, 2015 9:20:31 PM GMT+02:00, Waldemar Brodkorb
<w...@openadk.org> wrote:
>Hi Yuriy,
>
>can you
1/2] libc: fix setting return value and errno in fallocate()
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 03:56:55PM +, Yuriy Kolerov wrote:
> Hi Waldemar and Bernhard.
>
> First of all sorry for the absent of the detailed explanation of my
> fixes. I'm going to send a second version of patch
On September 17, 2015 6:07:38 PM GMT+02:00, Rich Felker wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 03:56:55PM +, Yuriy Kolerov wrote:
>> Hi Waldemar and Bernhard.
>>
>> First of all sorry for the absent of the detailed explanation of my
>> fixes. I'm going to send a second version of
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 03:56:55PM +, Yuriy Kolerov wrote:
> Hi Waldemar and Bernhard.
>
> First of all sorry for the absent of the detailed explanation of my
> fixes. I'm going to send a second version of patches after our
> discussion.
>
> The problem is that fallocate does not pass LTP
Thursday, September 17, 2015 7:08 PM
>To: Yuriy Kolerov
>Cc: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer; Waldemar Brodkorb; uclibc@uclibc.org;
>vineet.gup...@synopsys.com; alexey.brod...@synopsys.com;
>francois.bed...@synopsys.com
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] libc: fix setting return value and errno in
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:27:40PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On September 17, 2015 6:16:48 PM GMT+02:00, Yuriy Kolerov
> wrote:
> >Hi Rich.
> >
> >fallocate must return 0 or -1. However posix_fallocate my return an
> >error code. So I think it would be
Hi Yuriy,
can you explain why these patches are useful?
Better standard conformance? Testsuite or runtime fixes?
Thanks
Waldemar
Yuriy Kolerov wrote,
> Signed-off-by: Yuriy Kolerov
> ---
> libc/sysdeps/linux/common/fallocate.c | 13 -
>
On September 16, 2015 9:20:31 PM GMT+02:00, Waldemar Brodkorb
wrote:
>Hi Yuriy,
>
>can you explain why these patches are useful?
posix_fallocate does not set errno, the non-standard, Linux fallocate does,
according to its manpage (and returns -1 upon error).
>Better standard
10 matches
Mail list logo