On July 31, 2015 9:59:48 AM GMT+02:00, Thorsten Glaser t.gla...@tarent.de
wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
We are happy to take tested patches to update stuff for sure!
Hm, okay. All my patches go via Waldemar, who’s the one having
the hardware and tests anyway. They
On July 27, 2015 11:15:40 AM GMT+02:00, Thorsten Glaser t.gla...@tarent.de
wrote:
Rob Landley rob at landley.net writes:
support, a tangled mess of headers copied from random glibc
snapshots,
Not to mention lack of later bugfixes from glibc.
was never a priority because glibc was inherently
Rob Landley rob at landley.net writes:
support, a tangled mess of headers copied from random glibc snapshots,
Not to mention lack of later bugfixes from glibc.
was never a priority because glibc was inherently so much worse that
just not being a gnu project made it smell like roses in
On 06/08/2015 10:35 AM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
Waldemar, Rob,
On Sat, 30 May 2015 10:06:08 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
Remember when buildroot announced they would switch their default libc
if the uClibc developers couldn't get a new release out? Remember how
that was over a year
Waldemar, Rob,
On Sat, 30 May 2015 10:06:08 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
Remember when buildroot announced they would switch their default libc
if the uClibc developers couldn't get a new release out? Remember how
that was over a year ago, ala
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Rich Felker dal...@libc.org wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 01:28:42PM +0300, Max Filippov wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
I see a qemu-system-xtensa so might give that a try too.
Please do. I'd be happy to answer
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 01:28:42PM +0300, Max Filippov wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
I see a qemu-system-xtensa so might give that a try too.
Please do. I'd be happy to answer any questions.
I also hope to port musl to xtensa this year.
Would
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Jaromír Cápík tav...@seznam.cz wrote:
On 29 May 2015 at 17:54, Jaromír Cápík tav...@seznam.cz wrote:
You mentioned a distro you boottrapped a couple of weeks
ago. Do you have a working rootfs environment I could
test?
I did not submit the m68k patch to OE
Hi,
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote,
On 29 May 2015 at 17:54, Jaromír Cápík tav...@seznam.cz wrote:
You mentioned a distro you boottrapped a couple of weeks
ago. Do you have a working rootfs environment I could
test?
I did not submit the m68k patch to OE yet since i meant to get gmp
Hi,
Rob Landley wrote,
Of course somebody did a uclibc-ng fork (bought the domain name and
everything), but I talked to him and his reason for doing it is there
are some obscure targets even glibc doesn't support, and I expect that
as musl grows support for those targets his reasons for doing
Hello.
You mentioned a distro you boottrapped a couple of weeks
ago. Do you have a working rootfs environment I could
test?
I did not submit the m68k patch to OE yet since i meant to get gmp
going first, no.
Buildroot, Alpine-linux or gentoo come to mind, i'd try these with
current
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
I see a qemu-system-xtensa so might give that a try too.
Please do. I'd be happy to answer any questions.
I also hope to port musl to xtensa this year.
--
Thanks.
-- Max
___
uClibc
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 05:12:13AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 3:06 AM, Waldemar Brodkorb w...@openadk.org wrote:
Hi,
Rob Landley wrote,
Of course somebody did a uclibc-ng fork (bought the domain name and
everything), but I talked to him and his reason for doing it
Hello.
I'm trying to port my uClibc based distro to m68k and experience
SIGSEGV in __uClibc_main even when linking binaries statically.
I tried to crosscompile the m68k toolchain on i386 (uClibc based)
and m68k (glibc based) and in both cases the resulting binaries
segfault.
My biggest sin is
On 29 May 2015 at 13:11, Jaromír Cápík tav...@seznam.cz wrote:
Hello.
I'm trying to port my uClibc based distro to m68k and experience
SIGSEGV in __uClibc_main even when linking binaries statically.
I tried to crosscompile the m68k toolchain on i386 (uClibc based)
and m68k (glibc based) and
On 29 May 2015 at 13:11, Jaromír Cápík tav...@seznam.cz wrote:
Hello.
I'm trying to port my uClibc based distro to m68k and experience
SIGSEGV in __uClibc_main even when linking binaries statically.
I tried to crosscompile the m68k toolchain on i386 (uClibc based)
and m68k (glibc based)
On 29 May 2015 at 17:54, Jaromír Cápík tav...@seznam.cz wrote:
You mentioned a distro you boottrapped a couple of weeks
ago. Do you have a working rootfs environment I could
test?
I did not submit the m68k patch to OE yet since i meant to get gmp
going first, no.
Buildroot, Alpine-linux or
On 29 May 2015 at 17:54, Jaromír Cápík tav...@seznam.cz wrote:
You mentioned a distro you boottrapped a couple of weeks
ago. Do you have a working rootfs environment I could
test?
I did not submit the m68k patch to OE yet since i meant to get gmp
going first, no.
I found a complete
18 matches
Mail list logo
