Austin Foxley wrote:
On 04/14/2010 10:01 AM, Timo Teräs wrote:
Add attribute_hidden to all symbols having libc forwarder. This prevents
recursive self calls which would happen if libc is before libpthread in
linking order: the forwarder functions would call itself via the function
table, since
Austin Foxley wrote:
On 04/14/2010 10:01 AM, Timo Teräs wrote:
Add attribute_hidden to all symbols having libc forwarder. This prevents
recursive self calls which would happen if libc is before libpthread in
linking order: the forwarder functions would call itself via the function
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Austin Foxley wrote:
On 04/14/2010 10:01 AM, Timo Teräs wrote:
Hum. Actually looks like this is not right either. It appears that there's
several different ways how the pthreads mutexes are called from libc.
Previously uclibc had these:
1. internal libc locking:
Timo Teräs timo.te...@gmail.com wrote on 2010/04/16 10:00:59:
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Austin Foxley wrote:
On 04/14/2010 10:01 AM, Timo Teräs wrote:
Hum. Actually looks like this is not right either. It appears that there's
several different ways how the pthreads mutexes are called from
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Timo Teräs timo.te...@gmail.com wrote on 2010/04/16 10:00:59:
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Austin Foxley wrote:
On 04/14/2010 10:01 AM, Timo Teräs wrote:
Hum. Actually looks like this is not right either. It appears that there's
several different ways how the pthreads
Timo Teräs timo.te...@gmail.com wrote on 2010/04/16 10:22:54:
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Timo Teräs timo.te...@gmail.com wrote on 2010/04/16 10:00:59:
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Austin Foxley wrote:
On 04/14/2010 10:01 AM, Timo Teräs wrote:
Hum. Actually looks like this is not right either.
Yes. Exactly that. It's __attribute__(( visibility(protected) )).
Or .protected for asm. I'm doing a patch on this right now.
http://www.ohse.de/uwe/articles/gcc-attributes.html#func-visibility
But this is PROTECTED and you might need to impl. STB_PROTECTED in ldso
That should be
perusing the config parser
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com
---
include/sys/sysinfo.h |6 ++--
libc/unistd/sysconf.c | 85 +--
test/unistd/tst-getconf.sh |2 +
3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 15
Hi,
This series would add a generic config-parser (initially based off the
config-parser that we have in busybox).
This parser is used to handle files like:
/etc/hosts
/etc/networks
/etc/protocols
/etc/services
I think i've broken locking though, so it would be great if somebody who uses
threads
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com
---
libc/inet/resolv.c | 255
1 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libc/inet/resolv.c b/libc/inet/resolv.c
index 84289a6..92eefef 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com
---
libc/inet/getproto.c | 349 --
1 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 212 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libc/inet/getproto.c b/libc/inet/getproto.c
index bf7c093..bcf507b 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com
---
libc/unistd/usershell.c | 172 +++---
1 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 116 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libc/unistd/usershell.c b/libc/unistd/usershell.c
index 10c5bf1..2a6b665 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com
---
libc/inet/getservice.c | 351 +++-
1 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 212 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libc/inet/getservice.c b/libc/inet/getservice.c
index 6d80a1b..03f5c29 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com
---
Makefile.in|1 +
include/internal/parse_config.h| 50 +++
libc/misc/internals/Makefile.in|8 +-
libc/misc/internals/parse_config.c | 268
4 files
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com
---
include/netdb.h| 11 +--
libc/inet/Makefile.in |2 +-
libc/inet/getnet.c | 217
libc/inet/getnetbyad.c | 37
libc/inet/getnetbynm.c | 45 --
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Yes. Exactly that. It's __attribute__(( visibility(protected) )).
Or .protected for asm. I'm doing a patch on this right now.
http://www.ohse.de/uwe/articles/gcc-attributes.html#func-visibility
But this is PROTECTED and you might need to impl. STB_PROTECTED in ldso
That
Timo Teräs wrote:
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Yes. Exactly that. It's __attribute__(( visibility(protected) )).
Or .protected for asm. I'm doing a patch on this right now.
http://www.ohse.de/uwe/articles/gcc-attributes.html#func-visibility
But this is PROTECTED and you might need to impl.
Timo Teräs timo.te...@gmail.com wrote on 2010/04/16 11:39:00:
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Yes. Exactly that. It's __attribute__(( visibility(protected) )).
Or .protected for asm. I'm doing a patch on this right now.
http://www.ohse.de/uwe/articles/gcc-attributes.html#func-visibility
But this
Timo Teräs timo.te...@gmail.com wrote on 2010/04/16 11:45:54:
Timo Teräs wrote:
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Yes. Exactly that. It's __attribute__(( visibility(protected) )).
Or .protected for asm. I'm doing a patch on this right now.
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Timo Teräs timo.te...@gmail.com wrote on 2010/04/16 11:39:00:
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Yes. Exactly that. It's __attribute__(( visibility(protected) )).
Or .protected for asm. I'm doing a patch on this right now.
Timo Teräs wrote:
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Timo Teräs timo.te...@gmail.com wrote on 2010/04/16 11:39:00:
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Yes. Exactly that. It's __attribute__(( visibility(protected) )).
Or .protected for asm. I'm doing a patch on this right now.
Timo Teräs timo.te...@gmail.com wrote on 2010/04/16 13:04:57:
Timo Teräs wrote:
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Timo Teräs timo.te...@gmail.com wrote on 2010/04/16 11:39:00:
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Yes. Exactly that. It's __attribute__(( visibility(protected) )).
Or .protected for asm. I'm
On 04/16/2010 07:37 AM, Timo Teräs wrote:
Ok, second try on getting the libc - libpthread interactions right.
This includes the Joakim's patch for protected symbols, with a little
fix from me.
I thought the hidden symbol thing would work, because I thought when you turned
on stdio-futexes,
Austin Foxley wrote:
On 04/16/2010 07:37 AM, Timo Teräs wrote:
Ok, second try on getting the libc - libpthread interactions right.
This includes the Joakim's patch for protected symbols, with a
little fix from me.
I thought the hidden symbol thing would work, because I thought when
you
24 matches
Mail list logo
