Hi Waldemar,
On 19/08/16 08:53, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> Greg Ungerer wrote,
>
>> Hi Waldemar,
>>
>> On 16/08/16 03:21, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
>>> Hi Greg,
>>> Greg Ungerer wrote,
Hi Waldemar,
On this specific issue of simple flat binaries not working on m68k.
Hi Greg,
Greg Ungerer wrote,
> Hi Waldemar,
>
> On 16/08/16 03:21, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> >Hi Greg,
> >Greg Ungerer wrote,
> >>Hi Waldemar,
> >>
> >>On this specific issue of simple flat binaries not working on m68k.
> >>This fixes the issue:
> >>
> >>
Hi Waldemar,
On 16/08/16 03:21, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
Hi Greg,
Greg Ungerer wrote,
Hi Waldemar,
On this specific issue of simple flat binaries not working on m68k.
This fixes the issue:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k=146976701216533=2
I can run your hello binary now with no problems
Hi Greg,
Greg Ungerer wrote,
> Hi Waldemar,
>
> On this specific issue of simple flat binaries not working on m68k.
> This fixes the issue:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k=146976701216533=2
>
> I can run your hello binary now with no problems after this is
> applied.
Thanks for fixing
Hi Waldemar,
On this specific issue of simple flat binaries not working on m68k.
This fixes the issue:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k=146976701216533=2
I can run your hello binary now with no problems after this is
applied.
Regards
Greg
On 08/06/16 21:38, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> Hi
Hi Waldemar,
On 09/06/16 06:48, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> Greg Ungerer wrote,
>
>> Hi Waldemar,
>>
>> Sorry for the slow response. The uclinux-dev email list seems
>> very unreliable at the moment. I never got your last response,
>> but I can see it in the archives:
>>
>>
Hi Greg,
Greg Ungerer wrote,
> Hi Waldemar,
>
> Sorry for the slow response. The uclinux-dev email list seems
> very unreliable at the moment. I never got your last response,
> but I can see it in the archives:
>
> http://mailman.uclinux.org/pipermail/uclinux-dev/2016-May/052747.html
Oh, that
Hi Waldemar,
Sorry for the slow response. The uclinux-dev email list seems
very unreliable at the moment. I never got your last response,
but I can see it in the archives:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/pipermail/uclinux-dev/2016-May/052747.html
Waldemar Brodkorb wbx at openadk.org
Fri May 27
Hi Greg,
Greg Ungerer wrote,
> Hi Waldemar,
>
> On 26/05/16 22:05, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> > Greg Ungerer wrote,
> >> On 20/05/16 14:20, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> >>> Greg Ungerer wrote,
> On 16/05/16 19:54, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> > I compile and test the thread test app from
Hi Waldemar,
On 26/05/16 22:05, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> Greg Ungerer wrote,
>> On 20/05/16 14:20, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
>>> Greg Ungerer wrote,
On 16/05/16 19:54, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> I compile and test the thread test app from here on
> Qemu coldfire emulation:
>
Hi Greg,
Greg Ungerer wrote,
> Hi Waldemar,
>
> On 20/05/16 14:20, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> > Greg Ungerer wrote,
> >> On 16/05/16 19:54, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> >>> I compile and test the thread test app from here on
> >>> Qemu coldfire emulation:
> >>>
Hi Waldemar,
On 20/05/16 14:20, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> Greg Ungerer wrote,
>> On 16/05/16 19:54, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
>>> I compile and test the thread test app from here on
>>> Qemu coldfire emulation:
>>> http://debug.openadk.org/arm-pthreads/hello.c
>>>
>>> Sometimes it works,
Hi Greg,
Greg Ungerer wrote,
> Hi Waldemar,
>
> On 16/05/16 19:54, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> >I compile and test the thread test app from here on
> >Qemu coldfire emulation:
> >http://debug.openadk.org/arm-pthreads/hello.c
> >
> >Sometimes it works, sometimes I get SIGILL.
> >Tested with
Hi Waldemar,
On 16/05/16 19:54, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
I compile and test the thread test app from here on
Qemu coldfire emulation:
http://debug.openadk.org/arm-pthreads/hello.c
Sometimes it works, sometimes I get SIGILL.
Here is the strace output when I get SIGILL:
~ # strace -f /test
14 matches
Mail list logo