in
with snide remarks. Fake federalists is what I call them.
Kasangwawo
From: Owor Kipenji
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ugnet_: 1962 unworkable arrangement! - Kipenji
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 15:19:46 + (GMT)
Mwatu Rehema,could you really tell me what it is you
om proposing Buganda as one of the federal states. If you have a problem with the proposal concerning Bugisu, Sebei or Bukedi, why don't you propose an alternative ? We are all ears. Kasangwawo From: Owor Kipenji Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ugnet_: 1962 unworkable ar
Kipenji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: ugnet_: 1962 unworkable arrangement! - KipenjiDate: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 15:19:46 + (GMT)Mwatu Rehema,could you really tell me what it is you are trying toextract from me?Everybody has a choice on what the
TECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ugnet_: 1962 unworkable arrangement! Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:25:34 +
(GMT) So this time around,you did that very extensive consultations and yo!,you discovered that Bugisu and Sebei for example can work together or better still Bukedi which you refer
with the proposal concerning
Bugisu, Sebei or Bukedi,
why don't you propose an alternative ? We are all
ears.
Kasangwawo
From: Owor Kipenji
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ugnet_: 1962 unworkable arrangement!
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:25:34 + (GMT)
So
proposing Buganda as one of the federal states.
If you have a problem with the proposal concerning
Bugisu, Sebei or Bukedi,
why don't you propose an alternative ? We are all
ears.
Kasangwawo
From: Owor Kipenji
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ugnet_: 1962
ei or Bukedi, why don't you propose an alternative ? We are all ears. Kasangwawo From: Owor Kipenji Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ugnet_: 1962 unworkable arrangement! Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:25:34 +
(GMT) So this time around,you did that very extensive consulta
Listers
Please find candid answers to some federo questions @
http://www.federo.com/Pages/faq.htm
Obusingye
FN Lugemwa
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster.
Kipenji [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ugnet_: 1962 unworkable arrangement!
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 00:40:02 + (GMT)
Apart from the naming of the proposed 13 states,is there anything
fundamentally different from the 1962 unworkable arrangement?
Just
So this time around,you did that very extensive consultations and
yo!,you discovered that Bugisu and Sebei for example can work
together or better still Bukedi which you refer to and yet that entity
never exists anymore???.
The taste of the pudding is in the eating and so I will keep my ears
to
Mw. Kasangwawo
Unfortunately I happen to agree to small entities call them districts or federal entities for matter or organisational and managerial reasons.
They are easy to monitor and run by us in Uganda.
However just a few months ago I forwarded a proposal in such one district in Buganda
/Pages/Uganda_Constitution_1962.htmwhile the federal proposal is at:http://www.federo.com/Pages/FedsNet%20Federal%20Proposals.htmKasangwawoFrom: Owor Kipenji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: ugnet_: 1962 unworkable arrangement!Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 00
From the 1962 Constitution:
(1) Uganda consists of Federal States, Districts and the territory of Busoga.
(2) The Federal States are the Kingdom of Buganda, the Kingdom of Ankole, the Kingdom of Bunyoro, the Kingdom of Toro and the territory of Busoga.
(3) The Districts are the Districts of
Apart from the naming of the proposed 13 states,is there anything
fundamentally different from the 1962 unworkable arrangement?
Just wondering aloud.
Kipenji.
===
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends
today!
- --
From: Owor Kipenji [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ugnet_: 1962 unworkable arrangement!
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 00:40:02 + (GMT)
Apart from the naming of the proposed 13 states,is there anything
fundamentally different from the 1962
15 matches
Mail list logo
