Sure. Please open a JIRA issue and provide a patch. You can
just paste your message into the issue.
--Thilo
On 3/10/2010 17:35, Baptiste Gaillard wrote:
Hi,
I've read multiple messages about UIMA and OSGI on this forum.
On our project we have successfully integrated UIMA components
Does that mean we no longer have to copy sanbox projects
to uimaj to build them? I would love that.
--Thilo
On 3/8/2010 19:37, Marshall Schor wrote:
When we graduate, I think it would be a good idea to slightly
restructure our SVN layout, moving the trunk/branches/tags designation
to one
On 2/23/2010 17:02, Antonella Laterza wrote:
Hi everyone!
I've developed a plugin for the Jazz Rational Team Concert Eclipse Client
and I've included a UIMA aggregate analysis engine. To do this, I've set the
UIMA Nature to the project, I've installed the pear packages of the
components
* Jaroslaw Cwiklik cwik...@apache.org
* Joern Kottmannjo...@apache.org
* Jukka Zitting ju...@apache.org
* Marshall Schorsc...@apache.org
* Michael Baessler mbaess...@apache.org
* Thilo Goetz
On 1/28/2010 17:15, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
I'm probably showing my ignorance here :-) but, leaving aside the
question of making core uima support annotators as osgi bundles, can you
say what the differences are between the uimaj-ep-runtime bundle we
build for eclipse,
On 1/29/2010 10:12, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
Hi all,
we have 3 +1s and no 0s nor -1s.
Can we consider it passed and go on with importing the code?
Cheers,
Tommaso
Tommaso, how much code is it? If it's not a lot of code,
and you wrote all of it yourself, you can just commit it.
If it's a
On 1/20/2010 23:02, Jim Condit wrote:
Hi UIMA Dev,
Just wanted to let you know that the link to the REST server User Guide
seems to be broken:
http://incubator.apache.org/uima/downloads/sandbox/simple-server/simpleServe
rUserGuide.html
Thanks,
Jim
Thanks for
On 1/13/2010 10:01, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
Hi,
fot the January 2010 report (today is the deadline) I collected the
following items:
* 2.3.0-RC9 is out for testing and being voted as 2.3.0-incubating * UIMA
and Semantic Search presentation at IKS 2nd workshop (see [[
On 1/11/2010 17:18, Marshall Schor wrote:
[ ] +1 Release RC9, it's ready
[ ] -1 Don't release yet because of these issues which need to be
addressed first: ...
+1
--Thilo
--Marshall
Would it be appropriate to say something like
getting ready for a graduation vote very soon
so the Board knows we're getting there and doesn't
worry about us too much?
--Thilo
On 1/11/2010 10:52, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to add
- 2.3.0-RC9 is out for testing
-
UIMA
On 12/10/2009 13:49, Marshall Schor wrote:
[X] +1 Release RC7, it's ready
[ ] -1 Don't release yet because of these issues which need to be
addressed first: ...
--Marshall
+1
--Thilo
I tested the Eclipse tooling with Eclipse 3.4.2 and
3.5.1. I have some vague memory that we decided to
drop Eclipse 3.3 support for this release, is that
correct?
--Thilo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12783647#action_12783647
]
Thilo Goetz commented on UIMA-1682:
---
Another issue seems to me that the descriptor
pear files with our changes...
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Er, I see that this is now all maven based. I have
no idea how to add the missing jars. Over to you,
Marshall.
OK - will do...
-Marshall
--Thilo
On 11/23/2009 14:45, Thilo Goetz wrote
On 11/23/2009 18:12, Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
On 11/23/2009 15:47, Marshall Schor wrote:
A little more investigation: I think what is supposed to happen is that
the install process for the pear ends up calling
buildComponentClassPath in the InstallationController, which
it to, not all my eclipse dot files and whatnot.
But that's just my opinion.
--Thilo
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
On 11/23/2009 15:47, Marshall Schor wrote:
A little more investigation: I think what is supposed to happen is that
the install process
On 11/13/2009 04:53, Marshall Schor wrote:
The release candidate 01 for 2.3.0-incubating is on
http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.3.0-RC1/
It has 4 parts:
uimaj - the main uima release
uima-as - the uima-as add on
uima-sandbox - the sandbox components being released
On 11/13/2009 04:53, Marshall Schor wrote:
The release candidate 01 for 2.3.0-incubating is on
http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.3.0-RC1/
It has 4 parts:
uimaj - the main uima release
uima-as - the uima-as add on
uima-sandbox - the sandbox components being released
On 11/13/2009 16:32, Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
On 11/13/2009 04:53, Marshall Schor wrote:
The release candidate 01 for 2.3.0-incubating is on
http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.3.0-RC1/
It has 4 parts:
uimaj - the main uima release
uima-as - the uima
/browse/UIMA-1642
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Sandbox-RegexAnnotator
Affects Versions: 2.2.2
Reporter: Thilo Goetz
Assignee: Thilo Goetz
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 2.3S
Improve the regex
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thilo Goetz closed UIMA-1642.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Done. Also added test cases and updated documentation.
Regex rule file parameter
Marshall Schor wrote:
[...]
Both of these approaches put uimaj-core classes at the root level of
the application (i.e., System) class-loader chain. I can't think of
any cases where that would not be OK; can anyone else?
I think that may not work because the UIMA
framework classes need to
Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote:
Marshall, I cant close https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1531 yet.
Over the weekend I've discovered why the Logger ignores uima
formatter defined in Logger.properties and logs entries using the default
formatter (xml). It turns out that the java LogManager
Tommaso,
thanks for taking care of the report. I tried to add a line, but
can't seem to log in to the wiki right now. Since we don't have
much time, could you add a bullet on the recent UIMA workshop at
a comp. ling. conference (Joern and I were there):
- academic UIMA a
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo - I think you're probably the best one to add this doc; is this
something you can do shortly to include in 2.3.0 or should I defer this
past 2.3.0 release?
I don't think I'll be able to work on this immediately,
so let's please defer this till after the 2.3 release.
Marshall Schor wrote:
Eddie Epstein (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eddie Epstein reopened UIMA-1531:
-
In the previous version of UIMA AS, the CVD
For those of you not following the infra mailing list:
a distributed denial of service attack against the
machine that hosts our Jira instance has been ongoing
for the past several days. The infra team has been
able to contain the attack, but it is still ongoing
and Jira may be slower than usual.
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Works fine with UIMA 2.2.2. I guess it's time to nuke the
maven repo, do a clean extract from svn and see what happens.
And do a reboot in the bargain
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Works fine with UIMA 2.2.2. I guess it's time to nuke the
maven repo, do a clean extract from svn and see what happens.
And do a reboot in the bargain :-)
Did the above except nuke the maven repo, and it still hangs.
Let me know if you want me to do anything to investigate
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Works fine with UIMA 2.2.2. I guess it's time to nuke the
maven repo, do a clean extract from svn and see what happens.
And do a reboot in the bargain :-)
Did the above except nuke the maven repo, and it still hangs.
Let
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12759591#action_12759591
]
Thilo Goetz commented on UIMA-1546:
---
We need NOTICE/LICENSE files in the top level sandbox
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12759646#action_12759646
]
Thilo Goetz commented on UIMA-1546:
---
I may be confused. There is a Lic/Not file here
Marshall Schor wrote:
I went through these, and change the dependencies as follows:
1) org.apache.xmlbeans:xmlbeans changed to 2.4.0 (was 2.3.0) - several
other projects are using 2.4.0, and I thought it best to stay consistent :-)
2)javax.xml.bind:jsr173_api commented out. Instead, the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12758711#action_12758711
]
Thilo Goetz commented on UIMA-1581:
---
Is this also due to EOL character issues
Marshall Schor wrote:
Tommaso Teofili wrote:
the specific assembly for SimpleServer was added to make a distribution jar
when you run 'mvn package', containg /lib jars too (actually only
uima-simple-server-xbean-1.0.jar).
IIRC, this was added in UIMA-1462 to support the
Tommaso Teofili wrote:
Hi Marshall,I tried to remove jsr173 dependency from SimpleServer and
DictionaryAnnotator and used Xmlbeans 2.4.0 version.
Tests and packaging behave properly (/lib directory had not been removed in
SimpleServer since I was waiting for the issue to be closed, but it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12757853#action_12757853
]
Thilo Goetz commented on UIMA-1273:
---
The change only affects the pear runtime
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Thilo Goetz (JIRA) wrote:
Lucas: does not compile with Java 1.5
-
Key: UIMA-1552
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1552
Project: UIMA
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Marshall Schor m...@schor.com wrote:
After thinking about this for a while, and considering both methods, I
think the most reliable way to handle 3rd party Jars is to manually put
them into the lib/ directory, once, and then check
Michael Baessler wrote:
Some time ago we discussed another way to access the current trunk version
of the documentation.
For some projects this was already enabled, but it seems that it never works
:-(
We agreed to check-in the current pdf version of the documentation for a
component
Jukka Zitting wrote:
...
The LICENSE/NOTICE point that Thilo brought up is a valid one, though
especially when the default build embeds external dependencies to the
build target, it's quite OK to include also their licenses in the
licensing metadata even if those dependencies strictly speaking
See my other mail in this thread, but also inline
below.
--Thilo
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Marshall Schor m...@schor.com wrote:
After thinking about this for a while, and considering both methods, I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thilo Goetz reopened UIMA-1462:
---
Tommaso,
could you check that again? With the current version, the simple server has
test case
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thilo Goetz reassigned UIMA-1535:
-
Assignee: Thilo Goetz (was: Marshall Schor)
Lucas POM issues
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1551?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thilo Goetz closed UIMA-1551.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1535.
Lucas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thilo Goetz closed UIMA-1550.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1535.
Remove the uni-jena.de
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
Jörn Kottmann (JIRA) wrote:
Lucas PearPackagingMavenPlugin PEAR classpath is incorrect
--
Key: UIMA-1551
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1551
Project:
Jörn Kottmann (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12751370#action_12751370
]
Jörn Kottmann commented on UIMA-1535:
-
I was not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thilo Goetz resolved UIMA-1535.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Rico Landefeld (was: Thilo Goetz)
Patch applied, thanks Rico
Goetz
Assignee: Thilo Goetz
Fix For: 2.3S
Lucas uses IOException constructors that are not in Java 1.5.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
...@schor.com wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
The NOTICE file for Lucas currently does not list any
external dependencies. However, looking at Lucas after
it's been built, it seems to me we'll be shipping the
google-collections.jar. Is that correct? We ship
everything that ends up in lib
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thilo Goetz closed UIMA-1552.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Changes are minor. Rico, you may want to review them anyway.
Lucas: does not compile
Thilo Goetz (JIRA) wrote:
Lucas: does not compile with Java 1.5
-
Key: UIMA-1552
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1552
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Sandbox
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thilo Goetz reopened UIMA-1535:
---
This patch seems to have done a little too much clean-up. The lib directory of
the pear file is now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12751407#action_12751407
]
Thilo Goetz commented on UIMA-1462:
---
The simple server tests currently do not work
, Jaroslaw Cwiklik uim...@gmail.com wrote:
Thilo, recently I applied a patch attached to JIRA UIMA-1304. I only tested
this with JDK1.6. I will look into this today.
Jerry
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Thilo Goetz twgo...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi all,
has anything changed in the CPM recently? I get
Fix CFE notice and license file
---
Key: UIMA-1554
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1554
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Sandbox-CFE
Reporter: Thilo Goetz
Thilo Goetz (JIRA) wrote:
Fix CFE notice and license file
---
Key: UIMA-1554
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1554
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Sandbox-CFE
synchronization
issue, undoubtedly. Let me know if you want me to go back to an
earlier code level and try there, or if there's anything else I can
do to help.
--Thilo
JC
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Thilo Goetz twgo...@gmx.de wrote:
Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote:
Thilo, I've tried IBM's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thilo Goetz reassigned UIMA-1546:
-
Assignee: (was: Thilo Goetz)
I have checked all sandbox projects that will go into the next
would
be to try our last release on that machine with that jvm and see
if I have the same issue. I'll do that when I have time.
--Thilo
JC
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Thilo Goetz twgo...@gmx.de wrote:
Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote:
Ran on the command line multiple times with IBM 1.5
Works fine with UIMA 2.2.2. I guess it's time to nuke the
maven repo, do a clean extract from svn and see what happens.
And do a reboot in the bargain :-)
--Thilo
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote:
I've applied a patch to VinciCasProcessorDeployer.java. Build with a version
before
Fix sandbox notice and license files
Key: UIMA-1546
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1546
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Sandbox
Reporter: Thilo Goetz
Redirecting this thread to uima-dev, may be
useful information for other people as well.
Tommaso Teofili wrote:
Thanks a lot Marshall for being so helpful.
Recently I was reading something related to svn log, is there
something to do related to it?
I don't think so - but maybe
Hi all,
has anything changed in the CPM recently? I get
a reliable test case hang here (no cpu activity):
---
T E S T S
---
Running org.apache.uima.collection.impl.cpm.CpmProcessingTest
Julien Nioche wrote:
Hi,
I was having the same problem as Jorn using the default version of Maven
from Ubuntu. I have upgraded it to 2.2.1 and can now build UIMA but still
cannot build the TikaAnnotator.
When doing svn install in the TikaAnnotator directory I am getting :
*Reason: Cannot
Reporter: Thilo Goetz
Assignee: Thilo Goetz
Fix For: 2.3S
Simple server test cases fail in various JVMs due to various issues with XML
generation in those JVMs. This would not be problem if we had some sort of
semantic XML comparison capability (anybody know
Tommaso Teofili wrote:
Marhsall, I am afraid, you are right, some lines have not been merged
properly.
Do you know how can I fix it without changing revision?
I don't think you can (not sure though).
There's no problem with creating another revision. Just
fix the problem, and commit with the
Marshall Schor wrote:
[...]
Here's the story.
For this release, we are planning to release uima (base), uima-as,
sandbox, and uima-cpp together as one release.
The parent POMs were re-arranged so that the uimaj pom is now the parent
of the sandboxDistr pom.
Parent POMs are found via
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thilo Goetz closed UIMA-1547.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed for most jvms. Test cases still fail with at least one Sun Java 1.5 on
windows
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
[...]
So, all you have to do is build the uimaj POM and install it to your
local repository. (Note that after things are released, any user would
automatically get the parent POM downloaded from the release
repositories
Marshall Schor (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marshall Schor closed UIMA-1548.
Resolution: Fixed
Include LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files
The NOTICE file for Lucas currently does not list any
external dependencies. However, looking at Lucas after
it's been built, it seems to me we'll be shipping the
google-collections.jar. Is that correct? We ship
everything that ends up in lib, and nothing else?
Thanks,
Thilo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12750287#action_12750287
]
Thilo Goetz commented on UIMA-1326:
---
We provide a lot of code where users first have
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
Hi,
after building uima there are lots of empty src/main/resource/META-INF
folders
created in different projects.
Can these be added to svn:ignore ?
After building the docbook there are .db files created, why these are
checked in ?
Must they be checked in again
Have you tried deleting m2 repository? I did an svn up
and build yesterday, and it worked for me.
--Thilo
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
After updating to the newest uimaj/pom.xml file the build fails,
with the following error message:
jo...@karkand:~/uima-dev3/uimaj$ mvn -e install
+ Error
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
Tommaso Teofili wrote:
Hi Jorn,
which Maven version are you using?
2.0.9 on Ubuntu linux
Jörn
I'm using Apache Maven 2.1.0 (r755702; 2009-03-18 20:10:27+0100)
on windows. I think maven is at 2.2.x now?
--Thilo
I expect this is just a left-over and can be deleted?
--Thilo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thilo Goetz closed UIMA-1152.
-
Resolution: Invalid
I created some more tests, and they all run as expected. Maybe there's some
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
I expect this is just a left-over and can be deleted?
Here's a possible reason to leave this: users can get the history of
this folder, and find older releases, where they might expect them.
I'm no subversion expert, but I think since you moved
I would prefer to delete the directory. However, if we do
want to keep it, how about adding a (very short) readme that
directs people to the new location? An empty directory
seems a bit confusing.
--Thilo
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote
Burn Lewis wrote:
We have a very long list of jars in setUimaClassPath largely because we are
uncertain how many ActiveMQ jars to include ... currently we specify only 14
of the 31 that AMQ loads. And one of ours is wrong as we specify
commons-collections-3.1.jar while the library has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12750048#action_12750048
]
Thilo Goetz commented on UIMA-629:
--
+1 for going ahead with the fix.
Default file names
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12749422#action_12749422
]
Thilo Goetz commented on UIMA-1204:
---
I'm also ok with closing this as won't fix. I'd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thilo Goetz closed UIMA-1492.
-
Resolution: Invalid
It always takes me half a day at least to understand the CAS index
implementation
sc...@apache.org wrote:
Author: schor
Date: Fri Aug 28 19:28:58 2009
New Revision: 808996
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=808996view=rev
Log:
[UIMA-1536] initial import, moved from uimaj-tools
Added:
incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-bootstrap/
We create a new project just
just fixed
the pear runner not to go ahead an use any jar file it finds
in the lib directory. That kind of defaulty behavior has surprising
and undesirable effects.
-Marshall
Thilo Goetz wrote:
sc...@apache.org wrote:
Author: schor
Date: Fri Aug 28 19:28:58 2009
New Revision: 808996
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12749770#action_12749770
]
Thilo Goetz commented on UIMA-1462:
---
Tommaso, do you think this is something you could get
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12749770#action_12749770
]
Thilo Goetz edited comment on UIMA-1462 at 8/31/09 10:36 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thilo Goetz closed UIMA-1457.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Improved, but still documentation missing.
SimpleServer: docs need updating
Marshall Schor wrote:
All of our sandbox projects have at their top levels LICENSE and NOTICE
files. These files are somewhat different for different projects,
because the projects have different dependencies.
When we package the sandbox projects we are releasing into source and
binary
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12748762#action_12748762
]
Thilo Goetz commented on UIMA-1500:
---
+1 from me. It's still backwards compatible
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12748764#action_12748764
]
Thilo Goetz commented on UIMA-1326:
---
I think it's been tested as much as we can for now
Marshall Schor wrote:
Our main approach to packaging source files is to use Maven's assembly
plugin.
The Lucas project includes in its build section of its POM the
maven-source-plugin execution.
This results in generating 2 additional Jars - for the sources and the
test-sources, and
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
Jörn Kottmann (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12747822#action_12747822
]
Jörn Kottmann commented on UIMA-1523:
-
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Marshall Schorm...@schor.com wrote:
See this wiki page for info on the release plan:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/UIMA/ReleasePlan2.3.0
I was browsing the release plan and noted the following:
After freeze,
Marshall Schor wrote:
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
OK - sounds like this won't be on the fix list for 2.3.0 ;-)
And, given the value of being able to do this in selected cases, it
doesn't sound right, either, to change the arguments to find, moveTo,
etc from FeatureStructure.
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
FSIteratorT subiterator(AnnotationFS annot);
Is that correct ?
It leads to a problem in the Subiterator class, because it calls
moveTo(annot) on an FSIterator, but annot must not have type
T.
Jörn
Can you provide a little more context? I don't
understand what
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
FSIteratorT subiterator(AnnotationFS annot);
Is that correct ?
It leads to a problem in the Subiterator class, because it calls
moveTo(annot) on an FSIterator, but annot must not have type
T.
The AnnotationIndexImpl has this method
public
Michael Baessler wrote:
I think Thilo added this test, maybe the reference can be replaced.
-- Michael
When I extract the regex annotator, build it with
maven and do mvn eclipse:eclipse, I end up with
commons io on my classpath. How it gets there, I
have no idea. It's magic. When I added
1 - 100 of 1194 matches
Mail list logo
