Not quite right.
I do not only _removed_ .reboot-on 194 but _replaced_ it with
.ignore-error 194 so the install will not fail!
My goal was to use everything the unattended way except the reboot
mania with the updates.
I can not see how Autopatcher fits in... one thing are the missing
It should be ignore-err 194 not ignore-error 194
Good Luck
Christian Abels
Application Developer, Information Technology - Shipco Transport
For IT support related issues, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Artturi Kyrömies wrote:
Not quite right.
I do not only _removed_ .reboot-on 194 but
Artturi Kyrömies wrote:
Not quite right.
I do not only _removed_ .reboot-on 194 but _replaced_ it with
.ignore-error 194 so the install will not fail!
My goal was to use everything the unattended way except the reboot
mania with the updates.
I can not see how Autopatcher fits in... one thing
Not quite right.
I do not only _removed_ .reboot-on 194 but _replaced_ it with
.ignore-error 194 so the install will not fail!
My goal was to use everything the unattended way except the reboot
mania with the updates.
I can not see how Autopatcher fits in... one thing are the missing
Nelson Witten wrote:
Hello -
I recently got the unattended system going in a lab to test it out.
The only downside I see with the project is the length of time it
takes to install the OS and applications. For my situation it takes
just about 3 1/2 hours to install Windows XP, Office,
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 03:23:52PM +0200, Artturi Kyrömies enlightened us:
ps. anyone found a way to install Visual Studio .NET 2003 with
unattended, or is there already a script in the cvs/wiki somewhere I
just haven't noticed?
I'm doing it, but it's a bit hackish. It seems the main installer
Hi Nelson,
Nelson Witten wrote:
Hello -
I recently got the unattended system going in a lab to test it out. The
only downside I see with the project is the length of time it takes to
install the OS and applications. For my situation it takes just about 3
1/2 hours to install Windows XP,
ps. anyone found a way to install Visual Studio .NET 2003 with
unattended, or is there already a script in the cvs/wiki somewhere I
just haven't noticed?
I think there is an AutoIT script for it. 2005 seems to install fairly
nicely with just some parameters passed to it.
Brad Erdman
Jan Tietjen wrote:
Hi Nelson,
Nelson Witten wrote:
Hello -
I recently got the unattended system going in a lab to test it out.
The only downside I see with the project is the length of time it
takes to install the OS and applications. For my situation it takes
just about 3 1/2 hours to
Adam Peart wrote:
Jan Tietjen wrote:
Hi Nelson,
Nelson Witten wrote:
Hello -
I recently got the unattended system going in a lab to test it out.
The only downside I see with the project is the length of time it
takes to install the OS and applications. For my situation it takes
just
Jan Tietjen wrote:
I can not see how Autopatcher fits in... one thing are the missing
languages supported by this tool.
The only point was that Autopatcher installs all the updates, then
reboots after they are all installed
---
This
ps. anyone found a way to install Visual Studio .NET 2003 with
unattended, or is there already a script in the cvs/wiki somewhere I
just haven't noticed?
We used to use this here to install visual studio 2003 I believe.
http://ubertechnique.com/unattended/MS_Visual_Studio_2003
We now use
I recently got the unattended system going in a lab to test it out.
The only downside I see with the project is the length of time it
takes to install the OS and applications. For my situation it takes
just about 3 1/2 hours to install Windows XP, Office, hotfixes, and a
few other
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
For me it takes about an hour to install XP + Office + many apps (no hotfixes
though - they get downloaded later, automatically, anyway), on a 100 Mbit
network.
For me: The fixes are taking most of the time, because of the regular
reboots.
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
For me it takes about an hour to install XP + Office + many apps (no
hotfixes though - they get downloaded later, automatically, anyway),
on a 100 Mbit network.
For me: The fixes are taking most of the time, because of
Same here as well.. its the reboots on the updates that slows it down...
I wonder if using a WSUS server might help things here...
Brett
There is no salvation of the updates part if you do it the classic way. The
possible solutions are slipstreaming and patch integration or moving to
something
Comparatively I can use our RIS system or use
RIPREP images and rebuild a system in about an hour.
Imaging will always be faster than a native install. If you are looking
for the fastest way to deploy an OS, it doesn't get any faster then
imaging.
I think you also have to weigh your time
Hello -I recently got the unattended system going in a lab to test it out. The only downside I see with the project is the length of time it takes to install the OS and applications. For my situation it takes just about 3 1/2 hours to install Windows XP, Office, hotfixes, and a few other
Nelson Witten wrote, Am 19.01.2006 20:50:
Hello -
I recently got the unattended system going in a lab to test it out.
The only downside I see with the project is the length of time it
takes to install the OS and applications. For my situation it takes
just about 3 1/2 hours to install
19 matches
Mail list logo
