Re: Timeout semantics of Unbound differ radically from Bind 9

2016-04-09 Thread Aaron Hopkins via Unbound-users
yOn Sun, 10 Apr 2016, Dhalgren Tor wrote: However please note that Tor project has modified the eventdns code so it may not match exactly the behavior of the generic version. The generic version seems to have 3 retries at 3 seconds each, before considering the nameserver dead. So Tor's

Re: Timeout semantics of Unbound differ radically from Bind 9

2016-04-09 Thread Aaron Hopkins via Unbound-users
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, Dhalgren Tor via Unbound-users wrote: While I appreciate the elegance and persistence of Unbound's timeout scheme, it breaks Tor and probably breaks other high-volume DNS requesters that expect the simple ten-second timeout behavior of 'named'. Under the covers, Tor uses