Fongaboo via Unbound-users writes:
I have unbound running and clients using dig seem not to be able to trace?
dig +trace www.amiga.com
; DiG 9.6.2-P2 +trace www.amiga.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Received 12 bytes from MY-UNBOUND-IP#53(MY-UNBOUND-IP) in 0 ms
Casey Deccio via Unbound-users writes:
> > DNSVIZ say it's valid:
> > http://dnsviz.net/d/_25._tcp.eldinhadzic.com/dnssec/
> > how can I check my unbound could validate such data at all?
> >
> >
> I've added some checks to DNSViz to flag problems with ancestor names:
>
>
Robert Edmonds writes:
> W.C.A. Wijngaards wrote:
> > Unbound 1.6.1rc3 is available:
> > https://www.unbound.net/downloads/unbound-1.6.1rc3.tar.gz
>
> Hi,
>
> I notice that unbound-anchor from 1.6.1rc3 produces two DSes when run
> with "-F" (one for KSK-2010, one for KSK-2017), but it
Alexander via Unbound-users writes:
>
> Hi to every one, can you help to monitor unbound dns with cacti?
> I'm tried to set up unbound and cacti, but the graphs are empty. I'm
> installed Dmitriy Demidov package.
Once I set-up cacti to do this, but I'm not really happy with that.
"W.C.A. Wijngaards via Unbound-users" writes:
> Viktor,
>
> On 10/12/16 21:41, Viktor Dukhovni via Unbound-users wrote:
> > I waited until this week before upgrading from El Capitan to Sierra,
> > but perhaps that was not quite long enough... After the upgrade
> > "unbound" has become
Marek Sebera via Unbound-users writes:
> Hi,
>
> would it be possible to query Unbound instance cache, to return all
> hosts that has been resolved to specific IPv4 or IPv6 address ?
>
unbound-control dump_cache | 'some script you need to write'
jaap
Aowenson via Unbound-users writes:
> I am unable to find the key that is used to sign the unbound tar (key id
> 9F6F1C2D7E045F8D). I
> have
> searched a number of online key repositories (such as pgp.mit.edu), and
> although I can find many
> keys for NLnet Labs staff I cannot find an
Nick Urbanik via Unbound-users writes:
> Dear Folks,
>
> This question is about the version numbering system of unbound.
>
> Does the change from 1.6.x to 1.7.x indicate a major change of the
> software, or is it an incremental change in the way that 1.6.8 was an
> incremental change from
"Ronald F. Guilmette via Unbound-users" writes:
>
>
> I needed a new resolver for some research I'm doing, and I had just
> read recently about the various advantages of unbound, so I just
> did my first ever install of the pre-built Unbound 1.6.8 package
> on my FreeBSD system.
Note
