yOn Sun, 10 Apr 2016, Dhalgren Tor wrote:
However please note that Tor project has modified the eventdns code so
it may not match exactly the behavior of the generic version.
The generic version seems to have 3 retries at 3 seconds each, before
considering the nameserver dead. So Tor's
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, Dhalgren Tor via Unbound-users wrote:
While I appreciate the elegance and persistence of Unbound's timeout
scheme, it breaks Tor and probably breaks other high-volume DNS
requesters that expect the simple ten-second timeout behavior of
'named'.
Under the covers, Tor uses
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013, W.C.A. Wijngaards wrote:
Not for stub-prime, the newly introduced behaviour for 'normal
referrals' is to check at the parent as a last resort to get
information. When you add a stub-zone with stub-prime yes, then this
also activates.
Based on the current documentation, I
I internally override an externally visible domain to be able to give
different answers with a config like:
stub-zone:
name: example.com
stub-addr: 10.1.2.3
stub-addr: 10.1.2.4
stub-prime: yes
I recently upgraded from Unbound 1.4.4 to 1.4.19 and after running for a few
hours was
On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Leandro Anjos Moura wrote:
When my application directly query my server Bind all ips are utilized
in connection, but when my application query my server Unbound ips
network 10.XXX are never recovered.
See the rrset-roundrobin option as of Unbound 1.4.17:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Greg A. Woods wrote:
The key concept here is that notify says something has changed with the
given zone.
It means whoever sent you the NOTIFY has updated data for this zone.
However, unbound won't just query whoever sent it the NOTIFY; it will query
any authoritative
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, W.C.A. Wijngaards wrote:
By default, it polls every socket for 100 datagrams, but in
your case that can be 8000 'not port 53' sockets.
It might be an interesting experiment to track the average and max amount of
time spent handling 53 vs not-53 sockets in one pass on a
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Paul Wouters wrote:
Perhaps Wouter can explain that part, as I am sure some conscious design
decision has gone into that.
I'm guessing this is the same anti-feature-creep sentiment as why
round-robinning RRs was left out of NSD. This is unfortunate, because very
few
