Peter,
Thanks for your response.
But, the problems with UTR#7 making a normative reference to a
particular system for language identification are (a) that systems
get revised (RFC 1766 will become obsolete before long),
This is one reason I have suggested making reference to ISO standards
At 08:13 PM 9/2/00, John Cowan wrote:
Without seeing the text, I can't be sure, but I suspect what you have
is a superscript U+014B, LATIN SMALL LETTER ENG.
While looking at U+014B to convince myself that it isn't that, I ran across
U+019E, LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH LONG RIGHT LEG, which
On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Doug Ewell wrote:
This is one reason I have suggested making reference to ISO standards
in the past, rather than RFCs. When ISO standards get revised, they
retain the number and name of the earlier version, so documents that
reference those standards are *automatically*
But, the problems with UTR#7 making a normative reference to a
particular system for language identification are (a) that systems
get revised (RFC 1766 will become obsolete before long),
This is one reason I have suggested making reference to ISO standards
in the past, rather than RFCs.
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 04:56:23PM -0800, Doug Ewell wrote:
David Starner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the Euro currency symbol. A separate "fr_FR_Euro" locale would be
fr_FR@EURO is the way Sun does it.
OK, now how does Sun represent my modified "en_US" locale with
2000-09-02 date
For completeness sake, I will mention the Windows behavior here:
There is no way to extend locale IDs under Windows beyond what they are, but
it is possible to change the settings of the ones you choose at any time, in
order to customize them. Thus you can change things such as formats as much
Michael (michka) Kaplan wrote:
Note that Word 2000 will let you tag text with different languages and
assuming you have the spellcheckers install from the proofing tools with
properly recognize internationalization/localization in US English text
and internationalisation/localisation in UK
Well, this was one example among obviously thousands of differences between
the two. It is easy enough (in Word) to add the "z" version to a custom dir
once and never see it again
michka
- Original Message -
From: "Alistair Vining" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Unicode List" [EMAIL
On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Alistair Vining wrote:
Except that the Oxford dictionaries (and hence many UK users) have gone over
to -ize spellings, so you have to learn to ignore the false negatives and
search for the false positives...
In this case it is the Americans and the Oxonians who preserve
9 matches
Mail list logo
