Re: Unicode on a non-Unicode web page

2000-09-08 Thread Otto Stolz
Perhaps a typo only, but possibly with dire consequences; so I'd rather set it right. On Thu, 7 Sep 2000 07:16 (GMT-0800), Herman Ranes wrote: to make the HTML code 'understandable' to Netscape Navigator 4, without actually encoding in UTF-8: -Meta tag the document as UTF-8 -Encode

Re: Unicode on a non-Unicode web page

2000-09-08 Thread John Wilcock
[Sorry Paul, I didn't particularly intend to send this privately. I notice that the Unicode list no longer sets a Reply-To: header. Ô Sarasvati, might I humbly request that this behaviour be reinstated (though of course not overriding any Reply-To that individual subscribers may wish to set).]

RE: Unicode on a non-Unicode web page

2000-09-08 Thread Alan Wood
John Cowan wrote: Versions of Netscape before 4.7 had this bug: character references greater than #255; only worked if the transmission character set was UTF-8. This bug is still present in the Windows version of Netscape 4.75. Use Edit, Preferences, Fonts to make both Western and

Re: Unicode on a non-Unicode web page

2000-09-08 Thread Mark Davis
Take a look at the Unicode FAQ on the web, at www.unicode.org "Gary P. Grosso" wrote: Hi Unicoders, I am working on software to emit HTML in the encoding and character set of the user's choice, from SGML/XML documents which can contain any Plane 1 Unicode character. The question is what

Re: Surrogate support in *ML?

2000-09-08 Thread Mark Davis
Good point. In the past, I have used "surrogate characters" to refer to the characters encoded above , and surrogate code units to refer to the UTF-16 units D800-DFFF. However, I think that leads to confusion. Nobody has come up with a good term for all characters above . "Plane 1-16

RE: Win32: Commandline/batch ANSI-UTF8-UTF16-UTF8-ANSI conversion

2000-09-08 Thread Marco . Cimarosti
Title: Win32: Commandline/batch ANSI-UTF8-UTF16-UTF8-ANSI conversion tools Sure: uniconv.exe by Basis Technology. It is distributed for free as a demo of the Rosette library; download from http://rosette.basistech.com/demo.html. The version I have(quite old) does not support UTF-16, but it

Re: Surrogate support in *ML?

2000-09-08 Thread John Cowan
Mark Davis wrote: My personal favorite is "astral characters" (don't remember who came up with that). I did. Or at least I came up with "Astral Planes" as opposed to the "Basic Multilingual Plane". Somebody got mighty offended, though ("Those planes are *real*!"), so I dropped it. -- There

Re: Plane 14 redux

2000-09-08 Thread Roozbeh Pournader
On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Doug Ewell wrote: I have suggested on this list using Plane 14 tags to assist in glyph selection between C, J, and K or between Russian italics and Serbian italics because I thought they would provide a nice, all-Unicode solution *without* resorting to higher protocols.

Reply-To mess opinion [was Re: Unicode on a non-Unicode web page]

2000-09-08 Thread Mark Leisher
Look out! Hot button political issue! Delete if uninterested in opinion. John And I even more humbly request that it *not* be reinstated. Rather John than reiterating the arguments, I will point to Chip Rosenthal's John "Reply-To Munging Considered Harmful" at John