Sorry Roozbeh,
but Michael is right. That is the way how iranian newspapers use the '/' in
numbers and currencies. So when you distinguish between Novice and Professional
FARSI speaker you should first revolute the whole iranian writing class in not to
use the '/' they are used to do.
regards,
Michael (michka) Kaplan wrote:
in x86 NN 6.0 (and Mozilla for all milestones 13-18), it will format the
currency value or 3943.23 as 3,943/23. This is identical to the
behavior on Windows 2000 and Arabic Win98.
Just so I can follow, is this behaviour that's being discussed derived from
/
Indeed, that is the behavior being discussed. Me calling it the slash is
more of a silly Americanism than anything else. :-)
MichKa
Michael Kaplan
Trigeminal Software, Inc.
http://www.trigeminal.com/
- Original Message -
From: "Alistair Vining" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Unicode List"
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Alistair Vining wrote:
Just so I can follow, is this behaviour that's being discussed derived from
/ parallel to the former British usage whereby 120/- was 120 shillings and
no pence? I.e. is the mark a solidus?
No. The /-like shape is because Persian digit shapes are
Darya,
Look at http://oss.software.ibm.com/icu4j
This is an open source project which contains the kind of editor you're
looking for. The editor classes are in com.ibm.richtext. There's a sample
editor in com.ibm.richtext.demo.EditDemo.
Eric Mader
IBM Globalization Center of Competency,
Hi Mark,
You're right, but I believe what Erik is saying is that you can get
Japanese-looking characters to be *preferred* over Chinese-looking
characters (where fonts drawn in both styles are available) by using a
LANG attribute for a specific page or SPAN. This could increase the
acceptance of
I agree, that is the right thing to do. What wasn't clear from his message
is whether Mozilla picks a reasonable font if the language is not there.
Since NN didn't do this in the past, I was wondering whether that has been
improved.
Mark
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
As per the instructions of the Unicode Technical Committee, TR#22: Character
Mapping Markup Language (CharMapML) has been advanced from draft TR to full
TR. See http://www.unicode.org/unicode/reports/tr22/ for more information.
Note: The UTC intends to continue development this TR to also
Hello,
Unicode 3.0 mentions 11 contemporary languages written in Arabic, most from Central
Asia, none from Africa except Arabic---Berber is not mentioned. Is Arabic script no
longer used south of the Sahara? Or does standard Arabic script easily cover relevant
African languages?
My usually
Unicode 3.0 mentions 11 contemporary languages written in Arabic, most
from Central Asia, none from Africa except Arabic---Berber is not
mentioned.
Hausa is definitely African, in Northern Nigeria. As I understand it the
use of Arabic script is somewhat limited compared to latin. But one
Wow! that was really useful. Got my JSP to work with the ResourceBundle
class.
But I have question re. Unicode. The tags in the tag files (*.properties
files), I have japanese language coded in \u format. But if I code the
same file in decimal format; \uDD, I get garbage in the browser. Any
Add to the list Brahui (spoken in Pakistan, mostly in Baluchistan province),
Darri, and Parkari (spoken in areas of Thar desert area bordering Pakistan
and India). About 12 years ago I had made a font for Parkari language at the
request of Christian missionaries who published translation of Bible
Mark Davis wrote:
What wasn't clear from his message
is whether Mozilla picks a reasonable font if the language is not there.
Sorry about the lack of clarity. When there is no LANG attribute in the
element (or in a parent element), Mozilla uses the document's charset as
a fallback. Mozilla
Mark Davis wrote:
What wasn't clear from his message
is whether Mozilla picks a reasonable font if the language is not there.
Sorry about the lack of clarity. When there is no LANG attribute in the
element (or in a parent element), Mozilla uses the document's charset as
a fallback. Mozilla
FWIW, IE does not do an absolutely stellar job here, either. Not all Unicode
subranges have fonts automatically assigned, yet it is smart enough if you
bring up the font dialog that lists the fonts which cover the subrange.
Although there was no "lame" button when I pulled up the dialog,
At 08:45 -0800 2000/12/1, MULTI-LINGUIST wrote:
Is it possible to type Urdu in Arabic Windows for a website?? I have
come to know that Arabic Windows does not support any TTF Urdu
fonts. Is this true?
I don't know. What code page are you using?
If it is true, then is it possible to transfer
From: "Edward Cherlin" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If your Urdu fonts are encoded according to a suitable Windows code
page,
Actually, there is no Windows code page that covers Urdu (unfortunately).
There are over a dozen characters missing in 1256, for example. And thats
the best of the lot!
This
17 matches
Mail list logo
