On Monday, January 15, 2001, at 05:08 PM, G. Adam Stanislav wrote:
That's exactly what I said. Unicode as an international standard will
be pronounced internationally: Speakers of each language will have
their own pronunciation, and some will even spell it differently.
Ah, got it. I'm
On 16/01/2001 15:39:12 dank wrote:
[...]
I may be out of place here to suggest this; but perhaps the reason computer
encodings of these are always bad is the notations are poorly crafted. I
know its exceedingly politically incorrect to criticize a language as ill
formed, but it isn't a
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Dan Kolis wrote:
enough to be recognizable. Others suggest since the invention of film and
videotape, the notation itself isn't too important anymore. Seems to me a
user interface could be crafted and transfer motion vectors into something
like ASN.1 I wonder whether the
Page 324-327 of the Unicode Standard 3.0 mentions these code values as
non-characters; nevertheless, they are seemingly included as part of the
"Specials" block as described by this chapter.
However, the "block.txt" file does not include them as part of the
"Specials" block. Are they? Or are
John O'Conner asked:
Page 324-327 of the Unicode Standard 3.0 mentions these code values as
non-characters; nevertheless, they are seemingly included as part of the
"Specials" block as described by this chapter.
However, the "block.txt" file does not include them as part of the
"Specials"
5 matches
Mail list logo
