Dear folks,
may I know the institute's/centre's name, who are working in India for
Unicode based multilingual product except C-DAC, Pune. I would be
greatful to get the list.
thanking you in advance.
cheery regards to all
rajesh chandrakar
inflibnet centre,
ahmedabad, india
For people interested in new scripts, and new uses
of existing scripts :-)
http://www.google.com/intl/xx-hacker/
Regards, Martin.
At 12:14 +0200 2001-07-02, Martin Kotulla wrote:
Can anyone give me some information on the Slovenian and Croat letters
in the Unicode range U+0200 to U+0217?
Which purpose do these characters have? At what point in time have they
been in use?
They are used to mark tone in linguistic discussion
Michael Everson writes:
At 12:14 +0200 2001-07-02, Martin Kotulla wrote:
Can anyone give me some information on the Slovenian and Croat letters
in the Unicode range U+0200 to U+0217?
Which purpose do these characters have? At what point in time have they
been in use?
They are
Now available:
N2366 Proposal to add five phonetic characters to the UCS
by Richard S. Cook, Jr., and Michael Everson
http://www.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n2366.pdf
N2361 Revised proposal to encode the Osmanya script in the SMP of the UCS
From: Martin Duerst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
For people interested in new scripts, and new uses
of existing scripts :-)
http://www.google.com/intl/xx-hacker/
This looks like what is called L33T (elite) writing. It's popular
among online gamers. Kinda like computer pig latin...
At 08:22 -0700 2001-07-02, Vladimir Weinstein wrote:
Can anyone give me some information on the Slovenian and Croat letters
in the Unicode range U+0200 to U+0217?
They are used to mark tone in linguistic discussion of traditional
poetic texts.
Would you mind pointing to some
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Ayers, Mike wrote:
From: Martin Duerst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
For people interested in new scripts, and new uses
of existing scripts :-)
http://www.google.com/intl/xx-hacker/
This looks like what is called L33T (elite) writing. It's popular
among
From: Thomas Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Ayers, Mike wrote:
/|/|ike
The way you sign your messages is related to that, isn't it?
:) I've seen
]\/[, too.
Only related in spirit. I typed some slashes and bars together once
(I forget why - maybe a
Depending on what you consider everyday usage. Newspaper texts would be fine.
Literature and language scholars might require it.
However, every speaker of the language would understand the text without the accent
marks.
BTW. These accent marks are also used in the latin version of Serbian.
At 18:22 +0200 2001-07-02, Martin Kotulla wrote:
Which means that a Croat/Slovenian typeface would be regarded complete for
everyday use even without those characters. Right?
It would be better to have them than not, if you are asking my
opinion. Never underestimate the needs of your users.
--
Folks,
Time to register...September will be here before you know it. Hope
you can join us for our newly expanded 5-day conference.
Best regards,
Lisa
Nineteenth International Unicode Conference (IUC19)
Unicode and the Web: The Global Connection
Has anyone proposed the following for inclusion in Unicode? If so, what is
their status?
Daoist Hexagrams, 64 forms (the trigrams are already included, but with no
combining mechanism)
The Cangjie secondary signs, 87 forms for Traditional Chinese, plus 6
more to extend the system to
At 18:22 7/2/2001 +0200, Martin Kotulla wrote:
They are used to mark tone in linguistic discussion of traditional
poetic texts.
Which means that a Croat/Slovenian typeface would be regarded complete for
everyday use even without those characters. Right?
Yes.
There are very few typefaces
T|-|AT 1S S0 5EARC|-| ENGI|\|E5 W1LL N0T GET IT. U5E|) BY 1LLEG/\L S1TE5 A LOT.
$B$i$s$^(B $B!z$8$e$&$$$C$A$c$s!z(B
$B!!!_$"$+$M(B
$B!(B: RE: Innovative use of Latin ?!
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Ayers, Mike wrote:
From: Martin Duerst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
For people
$B$i$s$^(B $B!z$8$e$&$$$C$A$c$s!z(B
$B!!!_$"$+$M(B
$B!(B: Re: New characters query
At 12:33 -0700 2001-07-02, Edward Cherlin wrote:
Has anyone proposed the following for inclusion in Unicode? If so,
what is their status?
Daoist Hexagrams, 64 forms (the trigrams are
Michael Everson wrote:
At 12:33 -0700 2001-07-02, Edward Cherlin wrote:
Has anyone proposed the following for inclusion in Unicode? If so,
what is their status?
Daoist Hexagrams, 64 forms (the trigrams are already included, but
with no combining mechanism)
You're welcome to, if you
At 7:07 PM -0700 7/2/01, Richard Cook wrote:
Evidence? There's ample evidence, starting c. 1000 BC, with
[U+5468][U+6613] _Zhou Yi_ (aka _Yi Jing_ aka _I Ching_ aka _The Book of
Changes_), an artifact of the Zhou Dynasty ...
I agree with Richard here. It's silly to have the trigrams and not
John H. Jenkins wrote:
At 7:07 PM -0700 7/2/01, Richard Cook wrote:
Evidence? There's ample evidence, starting c. 1000 BC, with
[U+5468][U+6613] _Zhou Yi_ (aka _Yi Jing_ aka _I Ching_ aka _The Book of
Changes_), an artifact of the Zhou Dynasty ...
I agree with Richard here. It's silly
John H. Jenkins wrote:
At 7:07 PM -0700 7/2/01, Richard Cook wrote:
Evidence? There's ample evidence, starting c. 1000 BC, with
[U+5468][U+6613] _Zhou Yi_ (aka _Yi Jing_ aka _I Ching_ aka _The Book of
Changes_), an artifact of the Zhou Dynasty ...
I agree with Richard here. It's silly
John H. Jenkins wrote:
At 7:07 PM -0700 7/2/01, Richard Cook wrote:
Evidence? There's ample evidence, starting c. 1000 BC, with
[U+5468][U+6613] _Zhou Yi_ (aka _Yi Jing_ aka _I Ching_ aka _The Book of
Changes_), an artifact of the Zhou Dynasty ...
I agree with Richard here. It's silly
please unsuscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
22 matches
Mail list logo
