The Unicode data files at
http://www.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/ISO8859/ do not include a mapping
for ISO-8859-11, Thai. Is there any particular reason for this? Is
ISO-8859-11 unfinished or deprecated or unable to be mapped to Unicode
or some such? If none of these things are true, is there
Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit:
The Unicode data files at
http://www.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/ISO8859/ do not include a mapping
for ISO-8859-11, Thai. Is there any particular reason for this? Is
ISO-8859-11 unfinished or deprecated or unable to be mapped to Unicode
or some such? If
At 2:14 PM -0400 10/5/02, John Cowan wrote:
It's the same as TIS (Thai Industrial Standard) 620.
You can get Unicode-format mapping tables for TIS 620 and many other encodings
at http://crl.nmsu.edu/~mleisher/csets.html
Thanks. Looking at that, it appears the mapping is imperfect. There
are
- Original Message -
From: Elliotte Rusty Harold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: ISO 8859-11 (Thai) cross-mapping table
Thanks. Looking at that, it appears the mapping is
Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo at metalab dot unc dot edu wrote:
You can get Unicode-format mapping tables for TIS 620 and many other
encodings at http://crl.nmsu.edu/~mleisher/csets.html
Thanks. Looking at that, it appears the mapping is imperfect. There
are about 10 characters in TIS-620
Keld Jørn Simonsen keld at dkuug dot dk wrote:
Well, you double the introducer to represent itself, so the second
example is the correct interpretation.
...
The system, but not the RFC, has been extended, eg by ISO/IEC TR
14652. You can always use U or U identifiers for 10646
At 15:08 -0700 2002-10-05, Doug Ewell wrote:
The extension described in ISO/IEC TR 14652 seems only to have been
the addition of Eu for U+20AC EURO SIGN,
This is not the EU recommended fallback for the euro sign. The
recommendation is to use EUR or simply an E if that is not possible.
--
Michael Everson everson at evertype dot com wrote:
The extension described in ISO/IEC TR 14652 seems only to have been
the addition of Eu for U+20AC EURO SIGN,
This is not the EU recommended fallback for the euro sign. The
recommendation is to use EUR or simply an E if that is not possible.
Michael Everson scripsit:
This is not the EU recommended fallback for the euro sign. The=20
recommendation is to use EUR or simply an E if that is not possible.
They aren't fallbacks, but shortnames.
--
John Cowan[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At times of peril or
9 matches
Mail list logo
