Hi,
Can any body give me the path/url to get a Char set Detector. which can
detect the char set's encoding scheme ..atleast for shift_jis and big5.
I downloaded from mozilla and build it. It's working fine for UTF8 but
failing for shift_jis and big5 in some cases. I'm working on HP unix. If any
Richard wrote:
Erik, I think you are correct. The link should be like so:
http://www.unicode.org/cgi-bin/refglyph?24-2
I'm guessing this just hasn't been implemented yet.
I swear I've seen the glyph on this page before. When I looked at it in the PDF I
Michael Everson raises some interesting points.
William.
If CENELEC wishes to standardize a set of icons, they will do so. If
they have a need to interchange data using those icons, they will (if
they are wise) come to us an ask to encode them. If they want to use
the Private Use Area before
On Thursday, July 17, 2003, at 12:00 AM, Richard Cook wrote:
I'm guessing this just hasn't been implemented yet.
You are guessing correctly. Once some of the dust settles from my day
job, I expect I can get to this.
==
John H. Jenkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
William spilled another ocean of digital ink. Found bobbing
in that ocean was the comment:
Roozbeh and I assigned two unencoded characters for Afghanistan to
the PUA, and we encourage implementors to use them until such time as
the characters are encoded.
Yes. ... Now that at least one of
At 17:01 +0100 2003-07-17, William Overington wrote:
Michael Everson raises some interesting points.
William.
If CENELEC wishes to standardize a set of icons, they will do so. If
they have a need to interchange data using those icons, they will (if
they are wise) come to us an ask to encode
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 01:01:30PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.lisa.org/archive_domain/newsletters/2003/
3.2/lommel_unicode.html
This link seems to be broken. I get a message *Our apologies*
*The page you requested is not available.*
I guess you just have to combine the
Ostermueller, Erik wrote:
At unicode.org, when I click this link,
http://www.unicode.org/cgi-bin/GetUnihanData.pl?codepoint=2
I'm expecting to see a little square GIF that displays U+2.
Instead, I see N/A.
This has now been fixed. Thank you for pointing out the error. The code
was
On Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:23 PM, Michael Everson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 17:01 +0100 2003-07-17, William Overington wrote:
Now, I have never heard of the MES-2 whatever that is. However, I
do not have deep knowledge of the various standards which exist.
Could you possibly say some
282 MES-2 is specified by the following ranges of code positions as
indicated for each row...
Philippe Verdy asked:
As most of these characters are canonically decomposable, shouldn't this
list include also the decomposed characters?
Why is row 03 so resticted? Shouldn't it include
On Friday, July 18, 2003 2:18 AM, Kenneth Whistler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MES-2 was not designed by the UTC, nor did it take any of
these considerations into account. It is not really an
appropriate construct for the Unicode Standard. A more
meaningful way to think of it is: if you want to
Although some list members may already be aware of these pages, because
there are still very few web sites today that present text using a
variety of Unicode ranges for purposes other than 'display testing', I
thought the entire list should know about the Unicode pages on the Hot
Peach
12 matches
Mail list logo
