On 10/11/2010 9:49 PM, Janusz S. Bień wrote:
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 announceme...@unicode.org wrote:
The newly finalized Unicode Version 6.0 adds 2,088 characters,
What is the current total? Are other statistic informations available
somewhere?
The announcement gives a link to click
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 Asmus Freytag asm...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On 10/11/2010 9:49 PM, Janusz S. Bień wrote:
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 announceme...@unicode.org wrote:
The newly finalized Unicode Version 6.0 adds 2,088 characters,
What is the current total? Are other statistic informations
2010/10/12 Janusz S. Bień jsb...@mimuw.edu.pl:
The newly finalized Unicode Version 6.0 adds 2,088 characters,
What is the current total? Are other statistic informations available
somewhere?
However it does not provide the precise answer to my primary question,
which is not purely
FW to Unicode ml
From: ernestvandenbooga...@hotmail.com
To: jsb...@mimuw.edu.pl
Subject: RE: statistics
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:13:17 +0200
In 5.2, Chapter 2.4 table 2-3 is listed which General Categories are
characters. Out are: Surrogates, Private Use, Non-characters and Reserved
Not satisfied with the plain text only option on Twitter, a trend currently
seems to be to write love as ℒℴѵℯ (U+2112, U+2134, U+0475, U+212F) to get a
sort of handwritten display.
Creative, that's for sure.
--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org / asmodai
イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン
Ernest van den Boogaard wrote:
In 5.2, Chapter 2.4 table 2-3 is listed which General Categories are
characters. Out are: Surrogates, Private Use, Non-characters and
Reserved code points. Note that Format characters (Cf) are included as
characters. The code points with formatting aspects in C0
I guess it’s only a matter of 퐭퐢퐦퐞 before people start doing
things like 햙햍햎햘 (notice this email is plain-text).
--
Leonardo Boiko
I am used to relying on fonts from James Kass to display new Unicode
characters,
but his fonts have not been updated for Unicode 5.2 yet, and he has not
contributed to this list for some time.
I have e-mailed him, but he has not replied, which is not usual for James.
Does anyone know what has
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Leonardo Boiko leobo...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess it’s only a matter of 퐭퐢퐦퐞 before people start doing
things like 햙햍햎햘 (notice this email is plain-text).
Not that soon on Twitter, as Twitter apparently runs a filter and cuts
off all characters above U+ a
Leonardo Boiko leoboiko at gmail dot com wrote:
I guess it’s only a matter of 퐭퐢퐦퐞 before people start doing
things like 햙햍햎햘 (notice this email is plain-text).
I assumed this would become a big fad, back when I wrote my MathText
tool to automate the process, but it turns out not to have
We are in the process of updating the tags to sync with Unicode 6.0. This has
to be coordinated with the ISO Open Font Format standard, so may take a little
time.
Peter
From: unicode-bou...@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bou...@unicode.org] On Behalf
Of John H. Jenkins
Sent: Monday, October 11,
The Unicode standard only gives numeric values to rational numbers. Is
the reason for this merely because of the difficulty of representing
irrational ones?
In looking through the list of code points, I actually found only one
case where a character totally unambiguously refers to a
Here is the tailored announcement I wrote for the Persian computing
community:
http://www.advogato.org/person/roozbeh/diary/163.html
Roozbeh
Karl Williamson asked:
The Unicode standard only gives numeric values to rational numbers. Is
the reason for this merely because of the difficulty of representing
irrational ones?
No. Primarily it is because the Unicode Standard is a *character*
encoding standard, and not a standard for
Ken,
some comments, and a few suggestions near the end.
On 10/12/2010 4:56 PM, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
Karl Williamson asked:
The Unicode standard only gives numeric values to rational numbers. Is
the reason for this merely because of the difficulty of representing
irrational ones?
No.
Asmus,
I'm curious if any thought was given to this, and what code points I'm
missing in my analysis.
U+1D452 MATHEMATICAL ITALIC SMALL E (or merely U+0065 LATIN
SMALL LETTER E), also used for Euler's number. See also U+2147.
Now you are confusing Euler's constant - also depicted with
Dear Peter Costable,
it might be off-topic, When Microsoft will fix MLang bugs for Myanmar?
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2008/04/18/8403631.aspx
Burmese Font Developer, We are making fonts without Microsoft OpenType font
specifiction for Myanmar. Can we have any of specification for
I can’t comment on when limitations in MLang will be addressed; I can only say
that we are aware of them.
Can you clarify what you think is missing from Character Map?
Peter
From: Ngwe Tun [mailto:ngwes...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 7:39 PM
To: Peter Constable
Cc: John H.
18 matches
Mail list logo
