LinkedIn
Unicode,
J'aimerais vous inviter à rejoindre mon réseau professionnel en ligne, sur le
site LinkedIn.
Philippe
Philippe Verdy
_ chez -
Région de La Rochelle , France
Veuillez confirmer que vous connaissez Philippe Verdy
On 2010/10/30, at 下午8:42, Koxinga wrote:
My quickly done parsing program counted 1154 such pairs, where the head
character was the same as the character above. It seems to be always in the
order kTraditionalVariant then kSimplifiedVariant, so can maybe be
automatically corrected. It seems
What about fussball.de? Certainly they want fußball.de to continue to point to
them, as it did in IDNA2003.
What’s really needed is a “display form” and a “matching form”.
Linguistically, ss is nearly always identical to ß for matching, particularly
if you want both german and swiss users.
Excellent remark! Fu*ß*ball.de was my hope of last weeknow with
everybody of us jumping on it, I can 'forget it'. I will have to go for
a more modest name ;)
Yes, I think the current owners of Fussball.de will be notified that
they have 'sunrise period' (=priority period, on new domains,
I'd like to try to gauge the community's interest, if any, in some
possible updates to UTS #6 and the SCSU mechanism, as follows:
(1) Updating the spec to add dynamic-window offsets 0xA8 through 0xBF,
to permit encoding the blocks from U+A000 through U+ABFF in single-byte
mode. This would allow
Tamil alphabet represents places of articulation.
An average linguist, not capable of understanding the ancient scientific
methodology in which the alphabet is made to represent the places of
articulation and not phonemes, attempts to relate phonemic principles to
this original alphabet system.
Tamil alphabet represents places of articulation.
An average linguist, not capable of understanding the ancient scientific
methodology in which the alphabet is made to represent the places of
articulation and not phonemes, attempts to relate phonemic principles to
this original alphabet system.
Hi Doug,
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Doug Ewell d...@ewellic.org wrote:
I'd like to try to gauge the community's interest, if any, in some
possible updates to UTS #6 and the SCSU mechanism, as follows:
Personally: I like SCSU, but I think it has basically failed. It is
discouraged for
Hi, sorry for jumping in.
Mark's solution (to automatically offer both labels) is o.k. with me (I don't
know if one could be resold later without the other; perhaps but obviously I do
not wheel and deal in domain names) but I do feel like others on the list that
both ways of writing ss
9 matches
Mail list logo
