Philippe Verdy, Wed, 11 Jul 2012 07:36:56 +0200:
2012/7/11 Leif Halvard Silli:
In VIM, you set or unset the BOM via the commands
set bomb
set nobomb
Should these command specify if your computer will explode when saving
the file ?
:'o
Probably signals the weird fear
On 11 Jul 2012, at 03:01, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
Hans Aberg, Tue, 10 Jul 2012 22:41:26 +0200:
On 10 Jul 2012, at 21:30, Asmus Freytag wrote:
On 7/10/2012 3:50 AM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
Asmus Freytag, Mon, 09 Jul 2012 19:32:47 -0700:
The European use (this is not limited to
U+00B7 MIDDLE DOT
* also used to denote multiplication, for that usage 22C5 · DOT OPERATOR is
preferred
* also used in Catalan as a right-side diacritic added after a LATIN LETTER L.
* also used in some languages as a syllabic or morphemic separation
hyphen (distinct from the hyphen used to
On 11 Jul 2012, at 02:05, Ken Whistler wrote:
Incidentally, one of the reasons the set of symbols in the U+2200
Mathematical Operators block got a somewhat different treatment than
generic punctuation or other symbols or combining marks, when it comes
to unification versus non-unification
On 11 Jul 2012, at 03:51, Khaled Hosny wrote:
It can be handled at a different level; when one types 3:5 in a
Unicode-complient TeX engine, what gets output to the output file is the
ratio not the colon, and colon gets output with 3\colon{}5.
Actually, TeX does it wrongly relative Unicode: a
Hans Aberg, Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:20:11 +0200:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obelus
Thanks. Scandinavia's history indicates that if known in Denmark,
Norway and Finland, then it should be known on Iceland and in Sweden
too.
I can't recall the obelus being used for anything math in
On 11 Jul 2012, at 12:15, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
Hans Aberg, Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:20:11 +0200:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obelus
Thanks. Scandinavia's history indicates that if known in Denmark,
Norway and Finland, then it should be known on Iceland and in Sweden
too.
I can't
Am Dienstag, 10. Juli 2012 um 22:28 schrieb Asmus Freytag:
AF ... A nice argument can be made for encoding a raised decimal
AF dot (if it's not representable by any number of other raised dots
AF already encoded). Clearly, in the days of lead typography, a
AF British style decimal dot would have
Le 11/07/12 06:32, Philippe Verdy a écrit :
2012/7/10 Naena Guru naenag...@gmail.com mailto:naenag...@gmail.com
I wanted to see how hard it is to edit a page in Notepad. So I
made a copy of my LIYANNA page and replaced the character entities
I used for Unicode Sinhala, accented Pali
Leif Halvard Silli, Wed, 11 Jul 2012 03:01:53 +0200:
Btw, the venerable Danish Salomonsens conversional encyclopedia, the
1924 edition, says, that subtraction, quote: is written a – b or a ÷
b, where the – and the ÷ is called the minus sign. [7] So it sounds as
if it saw it as shapes of the
2012/7/11 Jean-François Colson j...@colson.eu
If your document only contains
?php
header(location:http://unicode.org;);
?
but you save it with a BOM, the BOM will be sent and you’ll get an error
message like
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by
(output
Le 11/07/12 14:15, Philippe Verdy a écrit :
2012/7/11 Jean-François Colson j...@colson.eu mailto:j...@colson.eu
If your document only contains
?php
header(location:http://unicode.org;);
?
but you save it with a BOM, the BOM will be sent and you’ll get an
error message
Philippe Verdy, Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:15:39 +0200:
2012/7/11 Jean-François Colson j...@colson.eu
If your document only contains
?php
header(location:http://unicode.org;);
?
but you save it with a BOM, the BOM will be sent and you’ll get an
error message like
Warning: Cannot modify
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:47:33AM +0200, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 11 Jul 2012, at 03:51, Khaled Hosny wrote:
It can be handled at a different level; when one types 3:5 in a
Unicode-complient TeX engine, what gets output to the output file is the
ratio not the colon, and colon gets output
On 11 Jul 2012, at 15:59, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:47:33AM +0200, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 11 Jul 2012, at 03:51, Khaled Hosny wrote:
It can be handled at a different level; when one types 3:5 in a
Unicode-complient TeX engine, what gets output to the output file is the
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:20:26PM +0200, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 11 Jul 2012, at 15:59, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:47:33AM +0200, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 11 Jul 2012, at 03:51, Khaled Hosny wrote:
It can be handled at a different level; when one types 3:5 in a
Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
As for editors: If your own editor have no problems with the BOM, then
what? But I think Notepad can also save as UTF-8 but without the BOM -
there should be possible to get an option for choosing when you save
it.
Perhaps there should be such an option in Notepad,
Karl Pentzlin karl-pentz...@acssoft.de writes:
Am Dienstag, 10. Juli 2012 um 22:28 schrieb Asmus Freytag:
AF ... A nice argument can be made for encoding a raised decimal
AF dot (if it's not representable by any number of other raised dots
AF already encoded). Clearly, in the days of lead
On 2012-07-11, Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com wrote:
There are a number of other incompatibilities between original TeX and
Unicode:
For example, ASCII letters are in TeX math mode typeset in italics, but
Unicode has a mathematical italics style, so ASCII letters should be typeset
upright
On 11 Jul 2012, at 16:33, Khaled Hosny wrote:
If I try the code below in lualatex, then the 푩 and the 퐁 both come
out typeset upright.
There is a “literal” mode in unicode-math package just for that, check
its manual for more details.
As for the ISO standards mentioned in section 5.2 Bold
On 11 Jul 2012, at 18:20, Julian Bradfield wrote:
On 2012-07-11, Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com wrote:
There are a number of other incompatibilities between original TeX and
Unicode:
For example, ASCII letters are in TeX math mode typeset in italics, but
Unicode has a mathematical italics
2012-07-11 19:33, Hans Aberg wrote:
As for the ISO standards mentioned in section 5.2 Bold style,
I’m sorry, I’ve lost the context: section 5.2 of what?
I think they call for the use of sans-serif fonts.
The ISO standard on mathematical notations, ISO 8-2, is very vague
about fonts:
On 11/07/2012 18:30, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
... For example, in formula mode, when you type “x”, Word by default
changes it to mathematical italic x. It does *not* used a normal “x”
of the font it uses in formulas (Cambria Math)—that font lacks italic,
and if you “italicize” it, you get fake
On 7/11/2012 9:20 AM, Julian Bradfield wrote:
Unicode is about plain text. TeX is about fine typesetting.
Too narrowly defined: Unicode.
I think Unicode is not just for plain text, but rather concerns itself
with only the lower layer of /any /text system.
When it's plain text, Unicode has
On 11 Jul 2012, at 19:30, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
2012-07-11 19:33, Hans Aberg wrote:
There is a “literal” mode in unicode-math package just for that, check
its manual for more details.
As for the ISO standards mentioned in section 5.2 Bold style,
I’m sorry, I’ve lost the context:
On 7/11/2012 11:02 AM, Eric Muller wrote:
On 7/11/2012 9:20 AM, Julian Bradfield wrote:
Unicode is about plain text. TeX is about fine typesetting.
Too narrowly defined: Unicode.
I think Unicode is not just for plain text, but rather concerns itself
with only the lower layer of /any /text
To extend the list, the Irish, Scots, English, Scandinavians and Poles
picked up the Roman heritage without the assistance of being physically
conquered. And the Romanians re-established it as an expression of
non-Slavness.
Well, the official language of Hungary was Latin up until 1844. Does
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 21:17:08 +0200
Joó Ádám a...@jooadam.hu wrote:
To extend the list, the Irish, Scots, English, Scandinavians and
Poles picked up the Roman heritage without the assistance of being
physically conquered. And the Romanians re-established it as an
expression of
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Richard Wordingham
richard.wording...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 21:17:08 +0200
Joó Ádám a...@jooadam.hu wrote:
To extend the list, the Irish, Scots, English, Scandinavians and
Poles picked up the Roman heritage without the assistance of
What is a number having a numeric type of digit meant to convey?
The old Unicode 2.0 definition definition of digit value seemed clear:
Digit value. This is a numeric field. If the character represents a
digit, not necessarily a decimal digit, the value is here. This covers
digits which do not
The decimal digits only include those characters that are used as part of a
standard positional decimal system. (We would be more consistent about
terminology, however.)
--
Mark https://plus.google.com/114199149796022210033
*
*
*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*
**
Looking at the two sets of Brahmi numbers would also be instructive...
Sent from my Android phone
On Jul 12, 2012 6:21 AM, Richard Wordingham
richard.wording...@ntlworld.com wrote:
What is a number having a numeric type of digit meant to convey?
The old Unicode 2.0 definition definition of
32 matches
Mail list logo
