In Russian, the difference between Е and Ё is primary at the beginning
of a word as they are considered distinct letters of the alphabet, yet
secondary in the middle of a word, as the dieresis over Ё is not
mandatory. As an example, ель ёлка, but тёлка тель, see
Leo Broukhis, Fri, 21 Dec 2012 01:31:18 -0800:
In Russian, the difference between Е and Ё is primary at the beginning
of a word as they are considered distinct letters of the alphabet, yet
secondary in the middle of a word, as the dieresis over Ё is not
mandatory.
As an example, ель ёлка,
[Philippe tells me that his message that I'm quoting could have been
rejected by the mailing list as spam; my answer is below.]
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Philippe Verdy verd...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
This is an interesting case. A solution would be to be able define a
distinct collation
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Leif Halvard Silli
xn--mlform-...@xn--mlform-iua.no wrote:
You say that the difference is primary in the beginning of a word but
elsewhere secondary. And yes, that orthographic dictionary that you
link to above, looks as you describe.
However, in reality, the
But I still intend to do this before the end of January.
Jameson
Resending my earlier reply. Apparently, by default, Gmail sends subject
lines in KOI8-R if they contain Cyrillic, and unicode.org rejects those as
likely spam. I just changed my Gmail settings to Use Unicode (UTF-8)
encoding for outgoing messages and hope this goes through. (*Please change
the
Leo Broukhis, Fri, 21 Dec 2012 08:57:11 -0800:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
You say that the difference is primary in the beginning of a word but
elsewhere secondary. And yes, that orthographic dictionary that you
link to above, looks as you describe.
2012-12-21 21:05, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
My Moscow Russian-Norwegian from 1987 and my Pocket Oxford Russian
Dictionary from 2003 agree that both list words on Ё and Е under the
same category – namely, under the letter Е.
This appears to be the case in any serious dictionary.
The use of
Fact is, again, that ёлка - in the wild - can be written ёлка and елка
Though you need a better dictionary: it's the diminutive of ель (as in
Yel'tsin) meaning fir tree, and is the 4-letter word for Christmas tree.
С Рождеством,
Joe
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi wrote:
2012-12-21 21:05, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
My Moscow Russian-Norwegian from 1987 and my Pocket Oxford Russian
Dictionary from 2003 agree that both list words on Ё and Е under the
same category – namely, under the
Jukka K. Korpela, Fri, 21 Dec 2012 21:35:16 +0200:
2012-12-21 21:05, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
My Moscow Russian-Norwegian from 1987 and my Pocket Oxford Russian
Dictionary from 2003 agree that both list words on Ё and Е under the
same category – namely, under the letter Е.
This appears
Don't worry, I think you now have another 5351 years until the next Mayan
Doomsday...
Happy Holidays to everyone
Clive
On Friday, December 21, 2012, Jameson Quinn wrote:
But I still intend to do this before the end of January.
Jameson
--
Clive P. Hohberger, PhD MBA
Managing Director
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Leif Halvard Silli
xn--mlform-...@xn--mlform-iua.no wrote:
In «Tolkovïj slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo jazïka» from 2005
(«Dictionary over contempary Russian language»), has located words on Ё
in its a separate category, consisting of exactly one word: Ёмкость.
Leo Broukhis said:
Granted, not yet, but by itself the argument is invalid. Unicode
collation rules are descriptive;
I'm not sure what you mean by that. UTS #10 is a *specification* of an
algorithm, with various options for tailoring and parameterization which make
it possible to
Joe, Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:48:47 -0800:
Fact is, again, that ёлка - in the wild - can be written ёлка and елка
Though you need a better dictionary: it's the diminutive of ель (as
in Yel'tsin) meaning fir tree, and is the 4-letter word for
Christmas tree.
The dictionary of Dal,[1] says:
Leo Broukhis, Fri, 21 Dec 2012 13:43:14 -0800:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Leif Halvard Silli
xn--mlform-...@xn--mlform-iua.no wrote:
In «Tolkovïj slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo jazïka» from 2005
(«Dictionary over contempary Russian language»), has located words on Ё
in its a separate
On 2012-12-21, Clive Hohberger cp...@case.edu wrote:
Don't worry, I think you now have another 5351 years until the next Mayan
Doomsday...
It's only 394 years till the next b'ak'tun.
--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number
And as you've no doubt heard to death by now, real Maya don't believe in that
apocalyptic mumbo-jumbo anyway. Today was a celebration.
--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA
http://www.ewellic.org | @DougEwell
-Original Message-
From: Julian Bradfield jcb+unic...@inf.ed.ac.uk
Sent:
http://xkcd.com/998/
On 2012年12月21日, at 下午4:22, Doug Ewell d...@ewellic.org wrote:
And as you've no doubt heard to death by now, real Maya don't believe in that
apocalyptic mumbo-jumbo anyway. Today was a celebration.
--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA
http://www.ewellic.org |
If the name of this ending baktun really means rebirth or renaissance,
then the real catastrophe occured 394 years ago, in 1618, just because of
the conquest of America by Spanish troops : which meant a massive death of
lots of Amerindians (most of them due to imported infections, to which
20 matches
Mail list logo
