Janusz S. Bień :
>
> 1. Graphemes, if I understand correctly, are language dependent, …
That’s true in linguistic terminology – well, at least within the more popular
schools of thought –, but not in technical (i.e. Unicode) jargon.
Quote/Cytat - Eric Muller (pią, 16 wrz 2016,
17:47:27):
On 9/16/2016 8:30 AM, Janusz S. Bien wrote:
Quote/Cytat - Eric Muller (pią, 16 wrz
2016, 17:03:54):
On 9/16/2016 6:52 AM, Janusz S. Bień wrote:
(when working on a corpus of historical
On 9/16/2016 8:30 AM, Janusz S. Bien wrote:
Quote/Cytat - Eric Muller (pią, 16 wrz 2016,
17:03:54):
On 9/16/2016 6:52 AM, Janusz S. Bień wrote:
(when working on a corpus of historical Polish we
noticed some cases where standard Unicode equivalence was not
convenient).
Quote/Cytat - Eric Muller (pią, 16 wrz 2016,
17:03:54):
On 9/16/2016 6:52 AM, Janusz S. Bień wrote:
(when working on a corpus of historical Polish we
noticed some cases where standard Unicode equivalence was not
convenient).
I'm very interested to know more about
>(I also don't quite understand the semantics of a base character followed by
>tag characters, to say the truth.)
Page 2 of the following document is where the idea was introduced.
http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2015/15145r-add-regional-ind.pdf
The document is linked from the following page.
jsb...@mimuw.edu.pl wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15 2016 at 21:27 CEST, e...@gnu.org writes:
[...]
>> Isn't "grapheme cluster" the definition you are looking for?
> I don't think so.
Is an example of a textel that would definitely not be a grapheme cluster be
when a character is expressed as a BASE
On 9/16/2016 6:52 AM, Janusz S. Bień wrote:
(when working on a corpus of historical Polish we
noticed some cases where standard Unicode equivalence was not
convenient).
I'm very interested to know more about those cases.
Thanks,
Eric.
On Thu, Sep 15 2016 at 21:56 CEST, jsb...@mimuw.edu.pl writes:
[...]
> 1. Graphemes, if I understand correctly, are language dependent, textels
> are not.
>
> 2. Textel "ń" means both U+0144 and , so it is a notion
> on a higher abstraction level then a grapheme cluster.
In other
> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 10:25:53 +0100 (BST)
> From: William_J_G Overington
>
> jsb...@mimuw.edu.pl wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 15 2016 at 21:27 CEST, e...@gnu.org writes:
>
> [...]
>
> >> Isn't "grapheme cluster" the definition you are looking for?
>
> > I don't
9 matches
Mail list logo