On 2018/02/17 08:25, James Kass via Unicode wrote:
Some people studying Han characters use the IDCs to illustrate the
ideographs and their components for various purposes.
Well, as far as I understand, this was their original (and is still
their main) purpose.
For example:
U-0002A8B8 ꢸ
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:04:34 +0100
Philippe Verdy via Unicode wrote:
> On the opposite, colored in Arabic or hieroglyph texts is a a useful
> emphasize and sometimes semantically significant (some rare old
> scripts also used dictinctive colors): we are in a case similar to
On 2/21/2018 11:45 AM, David Starner
via Unicode wrote:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:40 AM John W Kennedy
via Unicode wrote:
“Curmudgeonly” is a perfectly good English
I'm not speaking about hieroglyphs, even if they are perfectly readable in
monochrome on monuments.
I was just saying that colorful **emojis** are just a nuisance and colors
in them do not add any semantic value (except possibly flags, skin tones
were added only to avoid a never-ending battle on
Philippe Verdy:
>
> I even hope that there will be a setting in all browsers, OS'es, mobiles,
> and apps to refuse any colorful rendering, and just render them as
> monochromatic symbols. In summary, COMPLETETY DISABLE the colorful
> extensions of OpenType made for them.
See
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 7:55 AM Jeb Eldridge via Unicode <
unicode@unicode.org> wrote:
> Where can I post suggestions and feedback for Unicode?
>
Here is as good as any place. There are specific places for a few specific
things, but likely if you do have something that's likely to get changed,
On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:28:14 +0100
Philippe Verdy via Unicode wrote:
> I even hope that there will be a setting in all browsers, OS'es,
> mobiles, and apps to refuse any colorful rendering, and just render
> them as monochromatic symbols. In summary, COMPLETETY DISABLE the
>
http://www.unicode.org/faq/faq_on_faqs.html#34
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:40 AM John W Kennedy via Unicode <
unicode@unicode.org> wrote:
> “Curmudgeonly” is a perfectly good English word attested back to 1590.
>
Curmudgeony may be identified as misspelled by Google, but it's got a bit
of usage dating back a hundred years. Wiktionary's entry
On 2/21/2018 9:23 AM, Philippe Verdy wrote:
2018-02-21 18:10 GMT+01:00 Asmus Freytag via Unicode
>:
Feeling a bit curmudgeony, are we, today? :-)
Don't know what it means, never heard that word, not found in
dictionaries. Probably alocalUS
The Unicode website has a section for feedback in its menu, but in separate
projects for TUS and for CLDR.
There are also feedbacks requested for every proposed amendment to the
standard, annexes, and data. First search the relevant topic on the
website, then look at the side bar if there's no
2018-02-21 18:10 GMT+01:00 Asmus Freytag via Unicode :
> Feeling a bit curmudgeony, are we, today? :-)
>
Don't know what it means, never heard that word, not found in dictionaries.
Probably a local US jargon or typo in your strange word.
On 2/21/2018 7:28 AM, Philippe Verdy
via Unicode wrote:
2018-02-21 15:51 GMT+01:00 Khaled
Hosny :
Now if
he had used an emoji that shows the mode of the text it
would
On 2/21/2018 7:23 AM, Jeb Eldridge via
Unicode wrote:
Where can I post suggestions and feedback
for Unicode?
What kinds of suggestions / what kind of
feedback
2018-02-21 15:51 GMT+01:00 Khaled Hosny :
> Now if he had used an emoji that shows the mode of the text it would
> have been a lot more obvious, but we already established that the world
> does not need emoji.
>
No, I don't need emojis. Any emoji means all or nothing, they
15 matches
Mail list logo