On 2/13/2019 5:19 PM, Mark E. Shoulson
via Unicode wrote:
And
again, all this is before we even consider other issues; I can't
shake the feeling that there security nightmares lurking inside
this idea.
Default ignorables are bad juju.
A./
On 2/12/19 12:05 PM, Kent Karlsson via Unicode wrote:
Den 2019-02-12 03:20, skrev "Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode"
:
On 2/11/19 5:46 PM, Kent Karlsson via Unicode wrote:
Continuing too look deep into the crystal ball, doing some more
hand swirls...
...
...
The scheme quoted (far) below (from
Philippe Verdy replied to my post, including quoting me.
WJGO >> Thinking about this further, for this application copies of the
glyphs could be redesigned so as to be square and could be emoji-style
and the meanings of the characters specifying which colour component is
to be set could be
James Kass wrote:
Nobody disagreed and I think it’s a splendid suggestion. If anyone is
discussing drafting a proposal to accomplish this, please include me
in the “cc”.
I too would like to receive copies of any discussions please.
In relation to the proposal, I opine that the facility
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 9:35 PM Richard Wordingham via Unicode
wrote:
> Bash already seems to handle proportional fonts quite well when run
> under Emacs 'M-x shell',
Having never used bash inside Emacs's shell, here's my experience
after about a minute of trying it:
Cursor keys allow you to
5 matches
Mail list logo
