It seems that my first response to this discussion was not
delivered because my attachment image was too big. I'm sorry,
please let me post revised version...
--
China National Body had ever reported that they had a plan to
encode the character for the tablature, in IRG:
and that we have a bunch of base characters, we easily reach 10
and more characters if all possible permutations are encoded, and this
is certainly not what Unicode wants :-)
Indeed.
Some people may want to encode the tablature characters as precomposed
glyphs in square metric, and unify
On 30 May 2014 05:50, suzuki toshiya mpsuz...@hiroshima-u.ac.jp wrote:
BTW, a few (only one?) characters for the latter style are
sampled in a normal dictionary CiYuan, and will be included
in CJK Unified Ideograph Extension F.
I hope not. Just because it occurs in a Chinese dictionary does
China National Body had ever reported that they had a plan to
encode the character for the tablature, in IRG: [...]
Thanks.
BTW, a few (only one?) characters for the latter style are sampled
in a normal dictionary CiYuan, and will be included in CJK Unified
Ideograph Extension F. However,
4 matches
Mail list logo