Re: Bliss?

2014-10-14 Thread Doug Ewell
(not written by Markus) always trouble me: The proposed encoding does not use the lexical encoding model used in the existing ISO-IR/169 registered character set, but instead applies the Unicode and ISO character-glyph model to the Bliss-character model already adopted by BCI, since this would significantly

Re: Bliss?

2014-10-14 Thread Andrew West
On 14 October 2014 17:06, Doug Ewell d...@ewellic.org wrote: Statements in the linked article such as the following (not written by Markus) always trouble me: Gosh, I wonder who it could have been? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blissymbolsdiff=331226727oldid=331223779 Andrew

Re: Bliss?

2014-10-14 Thread Michael Everson
://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blissymbolsdiff=331226727oldid=331223779 Oof. Folks, I’m a member of the BC-UK committee and have been working with BCI for years to ready Bliss for encoding. Work proceeds apace. Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com

Bliss?

2014-10-13 Thread Jean-François Colson
Hello I’ve found a 16-year-old proposal for Blissymbolics ( http://www.evertype.com/standards/iso10646/pdf/bliss.pdf ) but nothing more recent. Was that script rejected? Was it forgotten? Are there any technical difficulties related to that proposal? Thx Jean-François Colson

Re: Bliss?

2014-10-13 Thread Markus Scherer
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Jean-François Colson j...@colson.eu wrote: I’ve found a 16-year-old proposal for Blissymbolics ( http://www.evertype.com/standards/iso10646/pdf/bliss.pdf ) but nothing more recent. Was that script rejected? Was it forgotten? Are there any technical difficulties

Re: Bliss?

2014-10-13 Thread Michael Everson
on this in the intervening years, and Bliss is much closer to maturity for encoding. Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/ ___ Unicode mailing list Unicode@unicode.org http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode

Re: Bliss?

2014-10-13 Thread Jean-François Colson
. The user community has been working on this in the intervening years, and Bliss is much closer to maturity for encoding. Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/ The script wasn’t mature enough. Does that mean that the shape of many characters changed in the following years? You say their chief

Re: Bliss?

2014-10-13 Thread Markus Scherer
As Michael said, I don't have information. But I found this which might help: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blissymbols#Towards_the_international_standardization_of_the_script markus ___ Unicode mailing list Unicode@unicode.org